Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

niyad

(113,348 posts)
Fri Nov 14, 2014, 07:58 PM Nov 2014

TIME Magazine Faces Backlash for Attempting to Ban the Word “Feminist”


TIME Magazine Faces Backlash for Attempting to Ban the Word “Feminist”








Time Magazine is facing backlash after a poll they released last week listing the work “feminist” alongside popular slang terms on a list of words that should be “banned” in 2015.
TIME posted a poll to its readers asking them to vote on a list of words that may cause you to “seek out the nearest pair of chopsticks and thrust them through your own eardrums.” Among common slang terms like “bae,” “turnt,” and “on nom nom nom,” TIME also posted the word “feminist,” for which the Magazine is now receiving a lot of negative attention.

The magazine lists reasons as to why each word on the poll makes them “cringe,” and the reason for listing “feminist” is attributed to the word becoming “a thing that every celebrity had to state their position on whether this word applies to them, like some politician declaring a party.” Despite the fact that TIME’s current cover artist is Taylor Swift, and Swift discusses her recent claiming of the title “feminist” within the feature article, TIME seems to think it might be appropriate and necessary to ban the word.

In a response to TIMEe’s poll, Huffington Post writer Emma Gray reminds us of the power behind the title “feminist.” Feminists have, after all, achieved women’s suffrage, fought for equal pay, demanded affordable and comprehensive healthcare, organized on college campuses to tackle the issue of sexual assault, and have fought tirelessly to achieve women’s equality. Gray writes that banning the word is not only offensive to the majority of women who identify as feminist, but “doing so, in essence, would erase the existence of a decades-long social movement.”

The poll has caused an uproar on social media, and the Feminist Majority Foundation released a petition to Managing Editor Nancy Gibbs, writing “Your poll adds to the hateful push against those who fight for equality every day” and asking Gibbs to “please reconsider and remove the word from your poll.” Currently, the petition has been signed by over 6,000 people.

Take Action: Bothered by the TIME article? Sign the petition here, and let them know!

http://feminist.org/blog/index.php/2014/11/14/time-magazine-faces-backlash-for-attempting-to-ban-the-word-feminist/
37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
TIME Magazine Faces Backlash for Attempting to Ban the Word “Feminist” (Original Post) niyad Nov 2014 OP
It's amazing that Time would make MissB Nov 2014 #1
Time magazine isn't who made "feminist" toxic davidn3600 Nov 2014 #2
What hurts is ignoramuses spouting false bullshit like geek tragedy Nov 2014 #3
Are you serious? davidn3600 Nov 2014 #6
And you'd be ok with "thinking outside of the box" about racism or homophobia, too? Ken Burch Nov 2014 #8
Oh it has gone well beyond simply "disagreeing with me..." trust me... davidn3600 Nov 2014 #11
I doubt that treestar Nov 2014 #26
Depends on what you mean by "racism" LostInAnomie Nov 2014 #32
Men who are as hostile towards feminism as you are typically find themselves alienating geek tragedy Nov 2014 #10
Are you oblivious to the hostile attitudes with these debates around here? davidn3600 Nov 2014 #12
Two things... Spazito Nov 2014 #24
what an utter bunch of nonsense. there is no such thing as monolithic feminism, and you niyad Nov 2014 #15
Yep. LostInAnomie Nov 2014 #34
this sounds like it was written by an MRA type cali Nov 2014 #28
Few identify as feminists, but most agree with equality davidn3600 Nov 2014 #29
I believe this is a prank. Nolimit Nov 2014 #4
you do realize that Time actually publishes articles titled "is feminism dead?", don't you? niyad Nov 2014 #16
"An uproar on social media." Oh, Lord, not again! Comrade Grumpy Nov 2014 #5
"I can't even" is a PHRASE, not a WORD! Ken Burch Nov 2014 #7
Mind you, this is the same magazine that gave Katie Roiphe massive play Ken Burch Nov 2014 #9
yes, theykeep hoping that if it is said often enough, it will happen. niyad Nov 2014 #13
. . . niyad Nov 2014 #14
Streisand effect? VScott Nov 2014 #17
what is the "streisand effect"?? niyad Nov 2014 #18
I haven't heard of 75% of those words myself. VScott Nov 2014 #21
thank you for the information. niyad Nov 2014 #22
There was a TIME when that magazine was relevant. Rex Nov 2014 #19
that was a long TIME ago--in another era. the only reason I know it is still around is because niyad Nov 2014 #20
I believe TIME made both Stalin and Hitler, Man of the Year. Rex Nov 2014 #23
I'm 58 years old. VScott Nov 2014 #27
Misleading headline SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #25
Ummm, did you read the question the poll asks you to answer. KitSileya Nov 2014 #30
Perhaps you should check yours SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #31
Yes jamzrockz Nov 2014 #33
Exactly n/t SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2014 #35
It's even worse than that, Niyad. It's racist as well as sexist. KitSileya Nov 2014 #36
I used to expect better of this site as well. some of what I have seen not only posted, but allowed niyad Nov 2014 #37
 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
2. Time magazine isn't who made "feminist" toxic
Fri Nov 14, 2014, 10:31 PM
Nov 2014

Most men, and a lot of women, have a problem with that word today.... not a problem with what it defines according to the dictionary nor the movement it represents, but the word itself is a problem. The mainstream uses it to define radicals. And a lot of people view the term as creating unnecessary division instead of focusing on unity and equality. It's basically an issue of semantics.

And a lot of people don't like putting themselves into an ideological box. Some people feel that if they attach labels to themselves that it limits their range of individual thinking. One of the weaknesses with feminism is it doesn't permit its supporters to think outside the box. Just look how people here are viciously attacked if they don't exactly agree with the feminist litmus tests. That kind of mentality has triggered all sorts of internal wars within the movement over the past 40 years that has resulted in the vast majority of people discarding the label completely and going it alone.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
3. What hurts is ignoramuses spouting false bullshit like
Fri Nov 14, 2014, 10:37 PM
Nov 2014

"feminism doesn't permit its followers to think outside the box."

 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
6. Are you serious?
Fri Nov 14, 2014, 11:13 PM
Nov 2014

If you don't agree exactly with A, B, and C exactly as the movement tells you how to believe, you will be called a misogynist.

I (and others) have been trashed on here for suggesting that an accused rapist get a fair trial in a court of law. I have been trashed for suggesting men and women be treated equally by the courts. I've been trashed for questioning the severity of "rape culture." I've been called a misogynist for suggesting that porn of consenting adults shouldn't be censored. I've seen multiple people here accused of hating women because they don't think prostitution should be a crime.

Where is the thinking outside the box? No one is permitted to deviate or they will be pounced upon.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
8. And you'd be ok with "thinking outside of the box" about racism or homophobia, too?
Fri Nov 14, 2014, 11:20 PM
Nov 2014


btw, you weren't trashed. People just disagreed with you. The problem is that it isn't enough for you to express your views...you want us to give you special deference as well.
 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
11. Oh it has gone well beyond simply "disagreeing with me..." trust me...
Fri Nov 14, 2014, 11:38 PM
Nov 2014

Because I said an accused rapist is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law, I've been flat out called a "rape supporter" and a "misogynist."

LostInAnomie

(14,428 posts)
32. Depends on what you mean by "racism"
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 05:56 PM
Nov 2014

If you mean "racism" as prejudice based on race, then I and almost everyone in the world would agree. If you define "racism" as something only white people can enact, as idiotic ivory tower academics and internet bloggers with an agenda define it, then I'm perfectly fine with "thinking outside of the box".

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
10. Men who are as hostile towards feminism as you are typically find themselves alienating
Fri Nov 14, 2014, 11:36 PM
Nov 2014

feminists. Usually because you and your fellow travelers lie about feminism and feminists.

Let us take the bullshit you're sprinkled here like you're Johnny Bullshitseed:

I (and others) have been trashed on here for suggesting that an accused rapist get a fair trial in a court of law.


Most feminists recognize the necessity of due process of law.

I have been trashed for suggesting men and women be treated equally by the courts.


Virtually all feminists oppose gender-based discrimination in courts.

I've been trashed for questioning the severity of "rape culture."


You have repeatedly denied the existence of rape culture, referring to it as "bullcrap." You have also bashed feminists for treating rape as having a gender component. Seriously. Feminists have good reason to trash you over your nonsense on rape culture and rape in general.


I've been called a misogynist for suggesting that porn of consenting adults shouldn't be censored. I've seen multiple people here accused of hating women because they don't think prostitution should be a crime.


Very many feminists are pro-porn, and very many favor decriminalizing prostitution. There are other feminists who disagree with them in part or in whole.

Feminists are not a brainwashed mass of reflexive ideologues incapable of thinking for themselves.

That you peddle such nonsense says everything about you, and nothing about feminism.
 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
12. Are you oblivious to the hostile attitudes with these debates around here?
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 12:57 AM
Nov 2014

I am certainly not the only DUer that claims these debates on here become incredibly hostile very quickly. I dont think there is any other issue on here so hotly contested. Threads on these issues end up 200+ replies, lots of personal attacks, and countless alerts and hides.

And just because I dont consider myself a "feminist" doesn't mean I don't support equality of the sexes.

Bernie Sanders doesn't consider himself a "Democrat," but that doesn't mean he's not a progressive.

Too many people are getting too hung up over labels. Why does it matter so much that a celebrity says they believe in gender equality but not a "feminist." Why is that such a big deal? The vast majority of Americans feel the same exact way (if you trust the polls).

Spazito

(50,365 posts)
24. Two things...
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 02:31 PM
Nov 2014

First, well said, I completely agree with everything you posted!

Second, I am SO going to steal " Johnny Bullshitseed", it is perfect.

niyad

(113,348 posts)
15. what an utter bunch of nonsense. there is no such thing as monolithic feminism, and you
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 01:19 PM
Nov 2014

saying that there is, is a clear indication that you have absolutely no idea what the word means.

LostInAnomie

(14,428 posts)
34. Yep.
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 06:01 PM
Nov 2014

Post any thread about consenting adults getting into porn or prostitution and see how many posts it takes to see accusations of supporting sex slavery, child prostitution, and rape get thrown around. You know, because that's what "consenting adults" implies.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
28. this sounds like it was written by an MRA type
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 03:19 PM
Nov 2014

truly disturbing to see such toxic crap here.

 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
29. Few identify as feminists, but most agree with equality
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 05:37 PM
Nov 2014
Only one-fifth of Americans identify as feminists, according to a new HuffPost/YouGov poll. But the vast majority fit the basic definition of the word.

According to the survey, just 20 percent of Americans -- including 23 percent of women and 16 percent of men -- consider themselves feminists. Another 8 percent consider themselves anti-feminists, while 63 percent said they are neither.

Broken down by party, 32 percent of Democrats, 19 percent of independents and only 5 percent of Republicans said they are feminists.

But asked if they believe that "men and women should be social, political, and economic equals," 82 percent of the survey respondents said they did, and just 9 percent said they did not. Equal percentages of men and women said they agreed with that statement, along with 87 percent of Democrats, 81 percent of independents and 76 percent of Republicans.

--
The gulf between the percentage of people who identify as feminists and the percentage who believe in the equality of the sexes may be partly due to a branding problem for the word "feminism." Thirty-seven percent said they consider "feminist" to be a negative term, compared to only 26 percent who consider it a positive term. Twenty-nine percent said it's a neutral term.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/16/feminism-poll_n_3094917.html

So over 80% of Americans believe in gender equality, but only 20% say they are a "feminist."

The word is a problem for a lot of people.

Nolimit

(142 posts)
4. I believe this is a prank.
Fri Nov 14, 2014, 10:58 PM
Nov 2014

It's probably some pranksters trolling TIME and exploiting their selection and voting options. 4chan likes to do this; they organized a campaign to send Justin Bieber to North Korea when his label threw a contest to send him to perform in a country with the most fans.

It's generally a poor idea to give the internet free rein to vote for something. When Mountain Dew asked the internet to vote for a name for their green apple Mountain Dew, names like "Hitler did nothing wrong" and "Mossad organized 9/11" were picked and voted for.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/13/4chan-mountain-dew_n_1773076.html


They also used spambots to vote for a Taylor Swift fan contest. Their goal was for a 39-year old man who wanted to sniff her to win.

http://gawker.com/4chan-rigs-contest-so-creepy-man-can-smell-taylor-swift-800887912

niyad

(113,348 posts)
16. you do realize that Time actually publishes articles titled "is feminism dead?", don't you?
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 01:20 PM
Nov 2014

see the post below for one of the covers.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
9. Mind you, this is the same magazine that gave Katie Roiphe massive play
Fri Nov 14, 2014, 11:24 PM
Nov 2014

when she was spreading her "there's no such thing as 'date rape'" cowshit and that once ran THIS memorable cover:



niyad

(113,348 posts)
13. yes, theykeep hoping that if it is said often enough, it will happen.
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 01:17 PM
Nov 2014

of course, my response has always been, "not so long as I draw breath."

 

VScott

(774 posts)
21. I haven't heard of 75% of those words myself.
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 02:19 PM
Nov 2014

Must be an age thing.

The Streisand effect is the phenomenon whereby an attempt to hide, remove, or censor a piece of information has the unintended consequence of publicizing the information more widely, usually facilitated by the Internet.

It is named after American entertainer Barbra Streisand, whose 2003 attempt to suppress photographs of her residence in Malibu, California inadvertently generated further publicity of it. Similar attempts have been made, for example, in cease-and-desist letters to suppress numbers, files, and websites. Instead of being suppressed, the information receives extensive publicity and media extensions such as videos and spoof songs, often being widely mirrored across the Internet or distributed on file-sharing networks.[1][2]


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect
 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
19. There was a TIME when that magazine was relevant.
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 02:11 PM
Nov 2014

I had no idea it was still in circulation.

niyad

(113,348 posts)
20. that was a long TIME ago--in another era. the only reason I know it is still around is because
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 02:16 PM
Nov 2014

I see the copies when I am checking out at the supermarket.

the last cover I noticed was the one that declared rand paul the "most interesting person in politics" or some such nonsense.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
23. I believe TIME made both Stalin and Hitler, Man of the Year.
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 02:21 PM
Nov 2014

At one TIME. WTF they would do that, I dunno. The only TIME I read the mag was sitting in doctors/dental offices...which years later was replaced with the Texas Monthly. I never see it on the shelves anymore - that area is dedicated to the teen pop magazines.

 

VScott

(774 posts)
27. I'm 58 years old.
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 03:01 PM
Nov 2014

And whenever I'm at the doctors or dentists office, I'll read Highlights Magazine just for
Goofus and Gallant.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
25. Misleading headline
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 02:36 PM
Nov 2014

in the linked article. Unless I missed it, I see nothing that claims Time is attempting to ban any words.

KitSileya

(4,035 posts)
30. Ummm, did you read the question the poll asks you to answer.
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 05:48 PM
Nov 2014

Perhaps you should check your reading comprehension.

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
31. Perhaps you should check yours
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 05:53 PM
Nov 2014

There is a big difference between asking "What word would you like to see banned?" and "We're trying to ban the word 'feminism'".

KitSileya

(4,035 posts)
36. It's even worse than that, Niyad. It's racist as well as sexist.
Sat Nov 15, 2014, 06:02 PM
Nov 2014

Many of the words on the list originated among black women, and were then appropriated by the larger culture - completely ignoring the origin of the expressions.

And them saying "You have nothing against feminism itself" is bullshit - so many people have a lot against feminism, heck, a quick perusal of DU should show them that. Hasn't TIME followed the news enough to see that many men who hate feminism and women are issuing death threats against women? Hasn't TIME seen that men have their own Ku Klux Klan against feminism, called MRAs?

I don't expect TIME to understand that 'feminist' has been treated the same way as 'liberal' because they are a shite magazine, but I used to expect better of DU. People who don't identify as either, should be given the banhammer here. Instead, anti-feminist misogynists and rightwing DINOs are allowed to spew their crap and ruin it.

niyad

(113,348 posts)
37. I used to expect better of this site as well. some of what I have seen not only posted, but allowed
Mon Nov 17, 2014, 10:11 PM
Nov 2014

to stand, has been disheartening, to say the very least.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»TIME Magazine Faces Backl...