General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJust saw a rather depressing notice on the bulletin board at school.
I've seen these from time to time over the years. To make a long story short, it advertised a benefit to be held for a 16-year-old girl who's been battling bone cancer since she was 11. It's to help pay for -- you guessed it -- medical expenses.
In no other civilized country do we see this!
LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)A country that does not recognize access to health care as a basic right of its citizens and that allows the degree of homelessness and poverty that exists here and that permits the rich to grow ever richer while millions struggle to stay afloat can hardly be called "civilized."
villager
(26,001 posts)I wonder if we'll ever get one?
Sarah Ibarruri
(21,043 posts)care, is unconscionable.
Occulus
(20,599 posts)Prosense will be along shortly to tell us all how this cannot possibly have been true.
gateley
(62,683 posts)we all are.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)...in our area. This week, my 6th grade daughter asked for all of our change--because the school is doing this
as a fundraiser for a girl who has cancer. Also, my daughter, who is in 5th grade--asked if she could bring
money--as they are raising money for a little boy who has brain cancer.
This type of fundraising is happening all over, I imagine.
And why are so many children getting cancer? There are many other children in our area with cancer. I guess
that's another question for another thread.
fascisthunter
(29,381 posts)than our right wing americans do... actually, it doesn't SEEM, because it has been proven with ACTION, not words. Calling yourself "pro-life" is spiffy when it's political, but in reality it actually means something substantive.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)They learned the hard way.
npk
(3,660 posts)It's funny how all these pro-life right wingers get so angry over a woman right to have an abortion, but once the child is born, it's basically fuck it let the child die just don't touch my taxes to help pay for health care.
This is an ass-backward country.
fascisthunter
(29,381 posts)they needed something to lift themselves up, because in reality, they are the most ammoral selfish people living on this earth, and even though they delude themselves into beliving they are honest, they know deep down inside they are hate-filled and embarrassed by it. They need a nanny to tell them what is right and wrong, because they are morally stupid people.
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)go up and have single-payer insurance for all than have to keep buying $5 tickets for shitty spaghetti and then another $10-$50 for bidding on auction items I'm not going to win. Spreading the cost would be better for everyone.
dflprincess
(28,082 posts)as it will still allow annual out of pocket expenses (in addition to the premium) in the thousands of dollars -- plus all the items the insurance company will decide are not covered expenses.
a2liberal
(1,524 posts)With the "Cadillac plan" tax, it actually encourages plans with high deductibles, so in effect you are forced to buy coverage that you can't afford to use, and if by chance you can afford to use it, the insurance company will still deny you benefits when you need them (investigations after-the-fact do you no good when you're dead or sicker because the for-profit company denied you something you needed). Seriously, does any industry other than insurance profit from denying you service? That's practically the definition of something that needs to be provided by government, not forcing citizens into the flawed profit-by-denial model.
marshall gaines
(347 posts)thank capitalism, repugs and their dem bluedog cronies, along with our for profit health care system/industry. god bless america
alp227
(32,056 posts)so that's why we don't need that BIG SOCIALIST GOVERNMENT BUREAUCRACY...the natural kindness of strangers creates a free-market safety net through private charity...doesn't it?
and y'all are right who are complaining about those "pro life" activists. They only care about pre-born kids (as George Carlin said, "pre-born? you're cool. pre-school? you're f-ed!"
AllyCat
(16,226 posts)with rooms that cost thousands of a dollars a day, tests that increase that cost...and many are there for MONTHS! And there is more than one of them. Or how about the mom that dies during delivery or shortly thereafter...who pays for her kids and their widower father? Guess they should have been "responsible" and planned for that eventuality, huh? And that is just a tiny fraction of what I see. And then of course, there are all the other people who deal with huge health issues, brought to us often by lack of regulation of our food and water supply, unsafe products, motor vehicle accidents, and just plain bad luck. But all those people are supposed to take "personal responsibility".
Once they are out of the womb, they're on their own!
SHRED
(28,136 posts)...is cruel and immoral.
Rainforestgoddess
(436 posts)but it's usually for travel expenses for the parents, or wheelchairs, or other expenses that are 'above and beyond' what the medical system pays for.
Lydia Leftcoast
(48,217 posts)to pay for the uncovered portion of their son's medical treatments.
He's doing fine, but his mother wondered what parents do who don't own a house to take out a second mortgage on.
Hold fundraisers, I guess.
In civilized countries, even those with the proverbial "waiting lists," a child with cancer would have priority.
Initech
(100,104 posts)That should be our new official motto.
just1voice
(1,362 posts)Let's a person know exactly where their priorities are when a broke little girl is dying from cancer and a $740 billion a year military supposedly needs more money.