Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsChuck Hagel's Resignation was Not Publicly Expected & Rattled Washington Defense Establishment
Whole article is worth the read...because my snips only can feature one limited part when the whole read give a better picture of the issues involved.------------
Hagels resignation was not publicly expected and rattled the Washington defense establishment.
Pentagon press secretary Rear Adm. John Kirby had said after the Nov. 4 midterm elections that Hagel had committed to remaining in the administration for its final two years. At a defense conference in California earlier this month, Hagel delivered a speech about acquisition reform as usual and gave no sign that he was planning to leave.
I dont get up in the morning and worry about my job, Hagel told Charlie Rose in an interview televised last week.
---snip---
More recently he has battled behind the scenes with Rice, even sending her a memo sharply critical of the administrations strategy for Syria. Senior defense officials have complained in reports by several news organizations, including POLITICO Magazine, about the National Security Councils micromanagement of national security and the growing centralization of decision making by the White House.
Both of Hagels predecessors in the Obama administration, Robert Gates and Leon Panetta, have written books complaining about the presidents national security policy process, and other critics seized on Hagels departure on Monday.
Hagel and Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey have sought to preserve maneuvering room for U.S. commanders to send troops to Iraq to help Iraqis in their battle against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant.
--snip----
Potential successors could include Michèle Flournoy, a former undersecretary of defense who now runs the Center for a New American Security; Deputy Defense Secretary Robert Work; or another administration alumnus such as Ash Carter, who stepped down as Hagels first deputy secretary.
Hagels tenure at the Pentagon has mostly been reactive. He launched major studies or reviews following the 2013 Washington Navy Yard shooting, scandals at military hospitals and revelations about cheating and decay within the Air Forces nuclear weapons units.
He also has taken on Panettas initiative to integrate more women into combat units, but that work has been slow in the Marine officer corps and in the special operations forces.
The Army has just begun an initial effort to send women to its elite Ranger School; completing that work will be among the challenges waiting for Hagels successor.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2014/11/chuck-hagel-to-resign-113131.html#ixzz3K2LFZeNX
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 933 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Chuck Hagel's Resignation was Not Publicly Expected & Rattled Washington Defense Establishment (Original Post)
KoKo
Nov 2014
OP
No, it wasn't, because usually mismanagement and mistakes precede a firing.
TwilightGardener
Nov 2014
#1
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)1. No, it wasn't, because usually mismanagement and mistakes precede a firing.
Or obvious acts of disloyalty, or some sort of scandal. I don't see that here. Usually you can see it coming, there will be public calls for cabinet officers to go. This does not sit well with me. Clapper, Brennan, Rice still have jobs. Someone needs to explain that to me.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)2. what is "acquisition reform"? nt
Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)3. The process of buying new items for the military
be it clothes, vehicles, weapons, ships, etc
grasswire
(50,130 posts)4. thank you
perhaps that means Hagel wasn't ordering enough expenditures for the MIC.
Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)5. Probably not, Congress has always been more then happy to order
things the military doesn't need or want
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)6. So maybe the "Washington defense establishment" needs some rattling. I know it needs some de-funding