Report on Ferguson: Darren Wilson has NOT been asked to surrender,

[pnwmom]

so his "representatives" think he was not indicted.

http://cnnuslive.cnn.com/Event/Grand_jury_rules_in_Michael_Browns_death?hpt=hp_t1

A source close to Darren Wilson told CNN's Don Lemon that the officer's representatives -- through a process of deduction -- have determined that there will be no indictment. At this point, if there was going to be an indictment, Wilson would have been asked to surrender, the source said late Monday.
by CNN's Steve Almasy 5:57 PM

[MohRokTah]

1. There will be no indictment.

The fix was in moments after the murder when the cops began the cover up.

[SummerSnow]

3. k&r.....you know it

[1StrongBlackMan]

2. I do not doubt there will NOT be an indictment ...

however, Wilson not being asked to surrender himself, before the indictment being announced is not surprising.

[ctaylors6]

4. Is that not Missouri law?

In some jurisdictions, indicted often required to surrender before grand jury verdict unsealed.

Of course this whole case has been handled so differently ....

[1StrongBlackMan]

7. I don't know about Missouri law ...

But my experience has it that defendants are required/asked to surrender after indictments are unsealed ... unless there is a substantial risk of flight.

But you are correct ... this whole case has been handled "so differently."

[JoePhilly]

5. They don't think the officials thought this through?

If they don't want the verdict to be known until 9pm est, they wouldn't do anything to tip folks off one way or the other before hand.

[helpmetohelpyou]

6. I saw that also but Toobin said it's not 100% that means nobill