Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf I am ever on a grand jury or trial jury in a non-violent drug case
I will be a nullifying juror.
I will not listen to testimony. I will not vote to indict, I will not vote to convict.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
11 replies, 968 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If I am ever on a grand jury or trial jury in a non-violent drug case (Original Post)
bluestateguy
Nov 2014
OP
And, possibly, less effective than telling the truth in the hearing of the jury pool.
merrily
Nov 2014
#8
The real integrity is in nullification. Right thinking people should not self select out.
TheKentuckian
Nov 2014
#10
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)1. +1,000,000,000,000
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)2. Then I sincerely hope that you are
never called to be on either one.
Bonx
(2,053 posts)3. Yep. Just waiting to implement.
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)4. Kick it hold out!
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)5. Oh and another one
"Failure to disperse" is a bullshit charge, and a non-crime for which I will never indict or convict anyone.
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)6. I hope you have the integrity to tell the judge that in advance.
Lying about it would be contemptible.
merrily
(45,251 posts)8. And, possibly, less effective than telling the truth in the hearing of the jury pool.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)10. The real integrity is in nullification. Right thinking people should not self select out.
Lie then nullify.
Fuck em that's why.
merrily
(45,251 posts)7. Please read what DUer librechick did
Sparhawk60
(359 posts)9. I would Listen to All Testimony....
and then be a nullifying juror. And, no, I will not tell the judge that for the simple reason he would prevent me from exercising constitutional right to nullify.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)11. You might have to during the jury selection lie, depending on the questions.