General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSenate report on torture exposes collusion between corporate media and CIA
by Niles Williamson
World Socialist Web Site, 11 December 2014
The executive summary of the Senate Intelligence Committees torture report sheds light on the manner in which the corporate media knowingly served as a conduit for the CIA to selectively and anonymously leak favorable reports on its interrogation program to the public. The Senate document also discloses that the media acceded to requests from CIA officials and Vice President Dick Cheney to withhold information about the program that was deemed unfavorable.
The report makes clear that the so-called free press in America functions as a propaganda arm of the state, with journalists serving as stenographers of official lies. Through the input of the CIA, the media sought to obscure the heinous character of the actions being carried out and condition public opinion to tolerate, if not support, so-called enhanced interrogation methods.
An entire section toward the end of the Senate report is devoted to the role of the media. It explains that the CIAs Office of Public Affairs (OPA) fed information to journalists on the torture program while the program was still officially classified in order to undercut critics and project a more favorable image of the program to the public. When such classified information was published, the CIA did not press for criminal investigations, as the leaks had been approved by the agency itself.
Classified information on the torture regime was provided to journalist Ronald Kessler, who used the information in his book The CIA at War, published in 2003. The Senate report states that the CIA decided not to investigate this as a leak of classified information because the book contained no first time disclosures, and OPA provided assistance with the book.
Senior Deputy General Counsel for the CIA John Rizzo is quoted as saying that an investigation was not opened because the transfer of information to Kessler had been blessed by then-CIA Director George Tenet.
CONTINUED...
http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2014/12/11/pres-d11.html
PS: I wonder how else CIA pressures Corporate McPravda?
PPS: I wonder if it would have made a significant difference had the media, uh, pressured Congress to release the report BEFORE the election?
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)the CIA doesn't just pressure the media, they plant their operatives right in the Media.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)The Aspens. Like Scooter Libby reminded Judy Miller, then an imprisoned NYT reporter, they're all connected underground.
stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)Today, his son plays with the Mighty in Washington and Wall Street bailout king AIG.
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Frank_Wisner
JEB
(4,748 posts)Presidents on down through the alphabet soup agencies are skating free. Why not just shut down all our prisons and throw open the doors. This is not a nation ruled by law.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)With all the friends George Bush has, we may have to build more prisons. The truth, history and the People are on the side of Justice.
JEB
(4,748 posts)I doubt that they are. The media, the administration and all to many "folks" seem to be content to sweep this under the rug and hope the blood seeps through the floorboards and the body doesn't stink too bad. People have been executed following due process for less horrendous acts than we are talking about today.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)And now that the world knows Congress knows, next on the agenda are getting the paperwork ready for indictments. Based on "money trumps peace" approach to governance, there is a paper trail of who has benefited from the golden calf called the war on terra, including Judge Mark Fuller who railroaded Gov. Don Siegelman.
blm
(113,706 posts)for an unchecked CIA well .HIS personal, inner power circle at the CIA, anyway.
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)And walker, texas ranger to promote w.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)In June 2006, Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff joined a panel of 24 cast and crew members at a Heritage Foundation event that was moderated by none other than hillbilly heroin popping Neo-Con talk show walrus Rush Limbaugh. Limbaugh put the morning forum in jeopardy when he planted a kiss on the lips of 24 actress Mary Lynn Rajskub, causing the media in attendance to almost projectile vomit their breakfast.
The show's connection to the Bush White House and the conservative establishment became explicit last June, when Homeland Security Chief Michael Chertoff appeared alongside the show's producers and three cast members at an event sponsored by the Heritage Foundation to discuss "The public image of US terrorism policy." The discussion was moderated by Rush Limbaugh. The C-SPAN store sells a DVD of the event--price reduced from $60 to $29.95.
The conference also featured numerous self-described national security experts and even Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. You can watch the two hour event by clicking here .
http://www.c-span.org/video/?193133-1/public-image-us-terrorism-policy
The show sometimes toys with the audiences discomfort about abusive interrogations. In Season Two, Bauer threatens to murder a terrorists wife and children, one by one, before the prisoners eyes. The suspect watches, on closed-circuit television, what appears to be an execution-style slaying of his son. Threatened with the murder of additional family members, the father gives up vital informationbut Bauer appears to have gone too far. It turns out, though, that the killing of the child was staged. Bauer, the show implies, hasnt crossed the line after all. Yet, under U.S. and international law, a mock execution is considered psychological torture, and is illegal.
On one occasion, Bauer loses his nerve about inflicting torture, but the show implicitly rebukes his qualms. In the episode, Bauer attempts to break a suspected terrorist by plunging a knife in his shoulder; the victims screams clearly disquiet him. Bauer says to an associate, unconvincingly, that he has looked into the victims eyes and knows that hes not going to tell us anything. The other man takes over, fiercely gouging the suspects kneeat which point the suspect yells out details of a plot to explode a suitcase nuke in Los Angeles.
Throughout the series, secondary characters raise moral objections to abusive interrogation tactics. Yet the show never engages in a serious dialogue on the subject. Nobody argues that torture doesnt work, or that it undermines Americas foreign-policy strategy. Instead, the doubters tend to be softhearted dupes. A tremulous liberal, who defends a Middle Eastern neighbor from vigilantism, is killed when the neighbor turns out to be a terrorist. When a civil-liberties-minded lawyer makes a high-toned argument to a Presidential aide against unwarranted detentionsYou continue to arrest innocent people, youre giving the terrorists exactly what they want, she saysthe aide sarcastically responds, Well! Youve got the makings of a splendid law-review article here. Ill pass it on to the President.
In another episode, a human-rights lawyer from a fictional organization called Amnesty Global tells Bauer, who wants to rough up an uncharged terror suspect, that he will violate the Constitution. Bauer responds, I dont wanna bypass the Constitution, but these are extraordinary circumstances. He appeals to the President, arguing that any interrogation permitted by the law wont be sufficiently harsh. If we want to procure any information from this suspect, were going to have to do it behind closed doors, he says.
more at link
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/external?http%3A%2F%2Fbooks.google.com%2Fbooks%3Fid%3DjrocSU5nXwMC%26pg%3DPA24%26lpg%3DPA24%26dq%3DSince%2BSeptember%2B11th%2C%2Bdepictions%2Bof%2Btorture%2Bhave%2Bbecome%2Bmuch%2Bmore%2Bcommon%2Bon%2BAmerican%2Btelevision.%2BBefore%2Bthe%2Battacks%2C%2Bfewer%2Bthan%2Bfour%2Bacts%2Bof%2Btorture%2Bappeared%2Bon%2Bprime-time%2Btelevision%2Beach%2Byear%2C%2Baccording%2Bto%2BHuman%2BRights%26source%3Dbl%26ots%3DdD5FTGNYOd%26sig%3DRQp8QmLUNd2jTnrk9GP0-y5gEao%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DX%26ei%3D6fL6T4zTN4ic8gTymKzeBg%26ved%3D0CEsQ6AEwAQ%23v%3Donepage%26q%3DSince%2520September%252011th%252C%2520depictions%2520of%2520torture%2520have%2520become%2520much%2520more%2520common%2520on%2520American%2520television.%2520Before%2520the%2520attacks%252C%2520fewer%2520than%2520four%2520acts%2520of%2520torture%2520appeared%2520on%2520prime-time%2520television%2520each%2520year%252C%2520according%2520to%2520Human%2520Rights%26f%3Dfalse
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Great post, Ichingcarpenter.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)They control every aspect of the media except for some tiny corners on the intrawebs.
And in those tiny corners of the internet they send their employees, their minions, to misinform the other users. While we pay for the privilege of being lied to 24/7.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)blm
(113,706 posts)along the way.
BFEE will continue.
spanone
(137,112 posts)bbgrunt
(5,281 posts)mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)It shapes their opinion into what corporations and government want it to be.
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)navarth
(5,927 posts)There will be no change as long as the TV works.
mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)But worse, by moulding public opinion into what the government (Bush) wanted, it was a form of mind control. In this case, make torture acceptable.
navarth
(5,927 posts)...two valuable resources.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)their free speech rights when they continually fuck over the the terms of the social contract.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)Wait.... Nope, not at all.
turbinetree
(24,983 posts)All you had to do was watch Hardball last night, it says it all.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)johnnyreb
(915 posts)A. The CIA Provides Information on the Still-Classified Detention and Interrogation
Program to Journalists Who then Publish Classified Information; CIA Does Not File
Crimes Reports in Connection with the Stories
Wow, what scumbaggery. They don't care how many millions of views all those media-deception youtubes have as long as their trickery still works on enough of your neighbors.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Probably is.
blm
(113,706 posts)activity going on there. I doubt there are many left in the news business these days that even remember.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)one of the networks (Fox? FX?) ran a macho Arnold anti-arab type movie, I think it was "Collateral Damage", back to back for about a week. It was over the top and blatant. It was basically on a continuous loop.
I knew it was some kind of propaganda tool. When Arnold became the governator I knew there were some well organized unseen forces behind his election.
annabanana
(52,791 posts)As usual, your posts add significant info to the discussion!
kentuck
(112,185 posts):kick:
JEB
(4,748 posts)noise
(2,392 posts)For example in the recent coverage we see no media effort to point out the contradictions in counterterrorism policy.
1) Why isn't strange pre 9/11 government conduct discussed? Most notably why did the CIA obstruct the al-Hazmi/al-Mihdhar investigation which not only related to the forthcoming 9/11 attack but also the in progress at the time USS Cole investigation?
2) Why did Tenet lie to the Joint Inquiry Congressional panel when asked if he met with Bush in the month before 9/11?
3) Why is there no mention that Bush and Cheney didn't want a 9/11 investigation?
4) Why doesn't the media talk about the weird cooperation of Bush and Cheney who would only meet with the 9/11 Commission together?
5) Why is there no mention of the Bush White House cover up of Saudi links to the hijackers?
6) Why did Bush not replace Tenet or Rice after 9/11?
Instead the media completely ignores all these issues.