Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFootnote 857
[font size="1"]President Kill III by Carl Oxley[/font size]What "Both Sides" are Ignoring
Torture Did Work to Produce War (See Footnote 857)
by SAM HUSSEINI
CounterPunch, WEEKEND EDITION DECEMBER 12-14, 2014
EXCERPT...
So, contrary to the claim that torture helped save lives, torture helped build the case of lies for war that took thousands of U.S. lives and hundreds of thousands of Iraqi lives, helping to plunge the region into astounding violence, bringing al-Qaeda into Iraq, leading to the rise of ISIS and further bloody wars. As Arianna Huffington noted: A perfect circle: Torture helps start Iraq War, which in turn gives us more people to torture. #happyhumanrightsday
This oversight perhaps shouldnt come as too big a shock given whos calling the shots in Washington: Feinstein and McCain both voted for the Iraq war authorization in 2002, as did virtually everyone running foreign policy atop the Obama administration: VP Joe Biden, Pentagon heads Bill Gates and Chuck Hagel and Secs. of State Hillary Clinton and John Kerry.
[font color="green"]Some have made an issue of videos of torture being destroyed but its been widely assumed that they were destroyed simply because of the potentially graphic nature of the abuse. But theres another distinct possibility: They were destroyed because of the questions they document being asked. Do the torturers ask: Is there another terrorist attack? Or do they compel: Tell us that Iraq and Al-Qaeda are working together.? The video evidence to answer that question has apparently been destroyed with barely anyone raising the possibility of that being the reason.[/font color]
Exploiting false information has been well understood within the government. Heres a 2002 memo from the militarys Joint Personnel Recovery Agency to the Pentagons top lawyer it debunks the ticking time bomb scenario and acknowledged how false information derived from torture can be useful:
The requirement to obtain information from an uncooperative source as quickly as possible in time to prevent, for example, an impending terrorist attack that could result in loss of life has been forwarded as a compelling argument for the use of torture. The error inherent in this line of thinking is the assumption that, through torture, the interrogator can extract reliable and accurate intelligence. History and a consideration of human behavior would appear to refute this assumption. The document concludes: The application of extreme physical and/or psychological duress (torture) has some serious operational deficits, most notably, the potential to result in unreliable information. This is not to say that the manipulation of the subjects environment in an effort to dislocate their expectations and induce emotional responses is not effective. On the contrary, systematic manipulation of the subjects environment is likely to result in a subject that can be exploited for intelligence information and other national strategic concerns. (PDF)
So torture can result in the subject being exploited for various propaganda and strategic concerns. This memo should be well known but isnt, largely because the two reporters for the Washington Post, Peter Finn and Joby Warrick, who wrote about in 2009 it managed to avoid the most crucial part of it in their story, as Jeff Kaye, a psychologist active in the anti-torture movement, has noted.
CONTINUED w links...
http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/12/12/torture-did-work-to-produce-war-see-footnote-857/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 1083 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (16)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Footnote 857 (Original Post)
Octafish
Dec 2014
OP
"another...possibility:(Torture videos) were destroyed because of the questions...being asked"
woo me with science
Dec 2014
#8
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)1. Self-inflicted and self-feeding wars.
The perfect way to drain our blood and treasure into the bottomless coffers of the MIC and the surveillance state.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)2. Absolutely, CJCRANE.
"Money Trumps Peace" = "Mission Accomplished"
bananas
(27,509 posts)3. kr nt
Octafish
(55,745 posts)4. Truth doesn't matter: Controlling the narrative is all.
For instance: Lies about Torture Continue
The sad truth is that today there are more people around the world who follow the ideology Osama bin Laden espoused than there were before 9/11. Americas turn to the dark side damaged our reputation and played into our enemys narrative.
GeorgeGist
(25,383 posts)5. They hate US for it's sociopaths ...
just as US hates theirs.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)7. Torture for a Higher Purpose...
The higher purpose being wars without end for profits without cease.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)6. interesting article, thanks nt
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)8. "another...possibility:(Torture videos) were destroyed because of the questions...being asked"
But theres another distinct possibility: They were destroyed because of the questions they document being asked. Do the torturers ask: Is there another terrorist attack? Or do they compel: Tell us that Iraq and Al-Qaeda are working together.? The video evidence to answer that question has apparently been destroyed with barely anyone raising the possibility of that being the reason.
Exploiting false information has been well understood within the government.
K&R