Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 02:45 AM Jan 2015

Am I reading this right? The Intercept has their own source inside AQAP?

Last edited Sun Jan 11, 2015, 05:59 PM - Edit history (1)

A source they gave anonymity to after re-printing AQAP statements in full, no less?

Or is Scahill conflating "source" (who divulges information on a 1-1 basis) with "spokesman" (who would be the same person or group of people responsible for disseminating AQAP communiques to the public) because there is a HUGE difference...
https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/01/09/alwaki-paris/

http://www.lawfareblog.com/2015/01/the-intercept-finds-an-anonymous-source-it-can-trust/

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
4. Scahill's done a lot of on the ground reporting in Yemen and developed a lot of sources there.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 03:04 AM
Jan 2015

If you're at all familiar with his reporting you'd be aware of this.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
7. I'm just interested to know why
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 05:56 PM
Jan 2015

FLM has long derided over-reliance on anon govt sources while giving AQAP anonymity+top billing...

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
8. Glenn Greenwald told us Al Awlaki was an innocent lamb who never even committed a
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 06:02 PM
Jan 2015

parking violation.

Surely this cannot be correct.

m-lekktor

(3,675 posts)
9. I know Jeremy Scahill's "Dirty Wars" documentary and book did that.
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 06:05 PM
Jan 2015

that's where i got my impression there was no actual proof he was a terrorist.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
10. Scahill simply forgot to mention at least 4 seperate court proceedings where evidence was introduced
Sun Jan 11, 2015, 06:42 PM
Jan 2015

showing that Awlaki was a co-conspirator in terror. He also forgot to mention Awlaki being on UN resolution 1267.

He is a liar.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Am I reading this right? ...