Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"Why Elizabeth Warren Won't Run"
Why Elizabeth Warren Won't RunBy Taegan Goddard at the Political Wire
http://politicalwire.com/
"SNIP.........................
Jill Lawrence Being president, or even just running for president, would dilute what the left loves best about Warren and also, perhaps, what the nation needs most from her. Being speculated about as a candidate for president, on the other hand, sometimes can be useful. Back in 1991, Sen. Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia told me he did not discourage speculation about a run for president because he was thrilled by the attention it generated for his ideas on health policy. So it is with Warren. She remains vastly influential as long as she retains her unique role in the national conversation. But if she actually were to run, all that would change. And her record so far suggests she knows it.
........................SNIP"
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 1012 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Why Elizabeth Warren Won't Run" (Original Post)
applegrove
Jan 2015
OP
I agree she is very powerful right now. I'd hate to see her dilute her fire the
applegrove
Jan 2015
#1
Hey, I got a deal for you, I will send Ted Cruz and Louis Gohmert for Warren, two
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#4
I could throw in Perry and a washed up used president who paints by numbers.
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#8
Yes. She adds depth and reawakens liberals in the USA. I'd love to see her as
applegrove
Jan 2015
#5
There you go, 20 years of service in the Senate would be good, she will do well.
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#6
applegrove
(118,696 posts)1. I agree she is very powerful right now. I'd hate to see her dilute her fire the
way Presidential Candidates have to.
sheshe2
(83,791 posts)2. Thanks apple.
She is my Senator from MA. I have been saying this all along.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)4. Hey, I got a deal for you, I will send Ted Cruz and Louis Gohmert for Warren, two
For the price of one.
sheshe2
(83,791 posts)7. Lol!
No deal! No No No!
Thanks anyway Thinkingabout.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)8. I could throw in Perry and a washed up used president who paints by numbers.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)3. She is very good in her field of expertise and does a good job.
Ted Kennedy had really big shoes for someone to fill and having Senator Warren has brought back some of the glitter. Kennedy was very liberal in his position, pushed for health care for so many years, it is unfortunate he was not here to see ACA implemented. She is in a very beneficial position and can serve a long time.
applegrove
(118,696 posts)5. Yes. She adds depth and reawakens liberals in the USA. I'd love to see her as
president. But I'd also love it if she was a senator for 20 years.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)6. There you go, 20 years of service in the Senate would be good, she will do well.