Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe True Cost of Citizens United: The Roberts Court’s Darkest Hour Revisited
http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/true-cost-citizens-united-roberts-courts-darkest-hour-revisitedIts been five years since the Supreme Court decided Citizens United, which allowed unlimited corporate money into the political system and increased the domination of democracy by the wealthy elite. Money has indeed overwhelmed the system since 2008. This rise of big money in politics has endangered democracy and emboldened those who want to put democracy up for sale to aggressively attack the modest campaign spending regulations that still remain.
A recent Demos report explores how, since Citizens United, the following have occurred:
In the 2012 election .01 percent of all Americans contributed more than 28 percent of all individual contributions.
In the 2012 election, Sheldon Adelson spent an estimated $150 million, $98 million through dark money channels. In 1980, by contrast, the largest donor gave $1.72 million (inflation-adjusted).
A 2013 study finds, millionaires receive about twice as much representation when they comprise just 5 percent of the districts population than the poorest wealth group does when it makes up 50 percent of the district.
Another 2013 study finds that the richest 1 percent of Americans are extremely active politically and that they are much more conservative than the American public as a whole with respect to important policies concerning taxation, economic regulation, and especially social welfare programs.
In the 2014 midterms, in the most competitive races, candidates got 86 percent of individual contributions from donors giving more than $200.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 767 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The True Cost of Citizens United: The Roberts Court’s Darkest Hour Revisited (Original Post)
xchrom
Jan 2015
OP
marym625
(17,997 posts)1. This is what will make fighting anything
Close to impossible. Especially since they also own most of the MSM.
K&R
merrily
(45,251 posts)2. CU stunk. However, it is not as though we did not have corrupt govt. before CU.
It was not so much of a sea change as it was incremental. It made things easier, especially anonymity. But, money was corrupting our government long before CU. Lobbyists in Dc increased exponentially after 1980. And, the fact that donations, esp. anonymous donations, are easier is not exactly forcing our elected "representatives" either to accept them or to sell out to donors.