John Boehner Faces a Revolt of the Moderates

[applegrove]

John Boehner Faces a Revolt of the Moderates

By Kevin Drum at Mother Jones

http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2015/01/john-boehner-faces-revolt-moderates

"SNIP.....................



Female lawmakers pushed the party to drop Thursday's planned vote on legislation that would ban abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy, forcing leaders to abruptly switch course and pass a different antiabortion bill.

Last week, a surprisingly large group of 26 House Republicans refused to support an amendment that called for ending deportation deferrals of young immigrants brought to the U.S. illegally as children. Those dissenters came within one vote of tanking the measure aimed at so-called Dreamers.

This comes from LA Times reporter Lisa Mascaro, who tells us these folks "bristle" at being called moderates. They prefer to be called pragmatists. Tomayto, tomahto, says me, though it's telling that "moderate" is still a dirty word in GOP land. It's also telling that all this fuss is over bills that everyone agrees are nothing more than the usual symbolic flotsam and jetsam that Republicans pass every year with no actual hope of any of them becoming law. This year, though, they're having trouble even doing that.

Why? Is it because the bills are slightly less symbolic than in the past? There is, after all, just a bare chance that some of them could get through the Senate if sponsors line up a few Democrats to join in. They'd still get vetoed, but they'd nonetheless be a little less symbolic in the public's mind. Or is it simply the fact that as Republican ranks grow, the party's victories increasingly come in more moderate districts? As Democrats lose ground in moderate districts and become more solidly liberal, perhaps it's inevitable that Republicans will become more like the Democrats of old.




.....................SNIP"

[napi21]

1. Maybe. The statement ha already been made that many of the states loost by the dems were won

by moderate Pubbies. They were in states where a radical RWer couldn't win. I HOPE that's correct. Maybe they'll finally be able to push those fundamentalists will be shoved back in their holes for a long time.

[KamaAina]

2. Both of them?

[itsrobert]

3. Don't be fooled, this is all about 2016

Republicans want to hold their seats in moderate districts that can flip between Republican and Democratic. Their goal is to maintain or expand their leads in the house and senate and take the White House where they will be able to whatever they want for two years.

Anything they do now faces a veto, so why not pretend some of their people are moderates so they can win those 50/50 districts in 2016?