General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJordan to execute Sajida al-Rashawi and five others
"Sky News reports Jordan will execute Iraqi prisoner Sajida al-Rahaswi and five others linked to terrorist organizations in the upcoming hours.
"The sentence of death pending on... Iraqi Sajida al-Rishawi will be carried out at dawn," the security official said on Tuesday, speaking on condition of anonymity to the Daily Star. "
http://www.albawaba.com/news/update-jordan-execute-sajida-al-rashawi-and-five-others-652304
Adsos Letter
(19,459 posts)Jordan is doing it.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)pampango
(24,692 posts)deter IS from its future public and gruesome executions.
Historic NY
(37,452 posts)they burned the pilot to death back on Jan 3rd.
pampango
(24,692 posts)alphafemale
(18,497 posts)Doubly glad they didn't cower to the ridiculous conditions, then.
Still really saddened by the death of the Japanese journalist who thought he could help his friend.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)pampango
(24,692 posts)Snow Leopard
(348 posts)pampango
(24,692 posts)it should not be done in retribution for actions taken by outside actors, but after due process and after all appeals are exhausted.
The US would have no right to execute prisoners at Guantanamo Bay in retribution for IS killing American hostages even if emotion tells us that we have to do 'something' to show that we are serious.
Snow Leopard
(348 posts)I'm asking what 'lot' is accomplished?
pampango
(24,692 posts)that "nothing" is accomplished by not killing them.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)I would tend towards "the only good ISIS member is a dead one."
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)Also, it was obvious ISIS weren't negotiating in good faith because they follow the logic of a horror movie, so it was clear what was coming. (Which is why I sometimes wonder who's writing this unfolding narrative).
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)never works.
After 9/11, America decided to become like the enemy and torture and hold suspects indefinitely without trial.
How did that work out for us?
Not too well.....
Snow Leopard
(348 posts)how do you know what the world would look like if that didn't happen?
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)We tried to stoop to their level in order to defeat the jihadists around the world and Sunni extremists in Iraq. Abu Ghraib? Torturing them never worked and now many of those same folks are ISIS fighters.
It didn't work because extremist groups like ISIS are stronger than ever.
That's my metric.
We've pretty much lost the "war on terror".
Time to move on and acknowledge our defeat.
Snow Leopard
(348 posts)You have a roster of ISIS fighters, and they are all ex detainees of Abu Ghraib? ISIS is stronger than ever? They've only been around for about a year.
We've killed scores of murderous bastards, so I don't see where we've 'lost' the war.
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)ISIS are the latest iteration of that group formed out of the Abu Ghraib atrocities and the Sunni insurgency.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Response to Tierra_y_Libertad (Reply #6)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)at a time.
6 down, several thousand to go.
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)They are on the right track, making the terrorists pay an equivalent price. Not to, just demonstrates weakness to them.
It's certainly 100% better than negotiating with these slime, which only encourages them to take more hostages.
Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)Sunrise there is 6:28am