General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUSA Today Columnist Worries That Democratic Women Have Stolen All the Power
Democrats are quite likely to nominate a woman for president in 2016, which would be the very first time in American history that a major political party has done such a thing. Ross Baker, a political science professor at Rutgers, explains in USA Today that this possibility should alarm us all. Baker argues that by allowing women to have power, the Democrats have scared off serious male challengers and created a gender problem in the party.
Baker pays lip service to the idea that it's good to let women have some power by allowing that the advancement and championing of women has been a source of justifiable pride for Democrats. Then he lets loose with his real argument, which is that allowing women into positions of power is inherently anti-male, because we all know how afraid men are to challenge women. Take Hillary Clinton and Rep. Nancy Pelosi, he writes. Both are towering and intimidating figures, who have sucked the oxygen out of the spheres they dominate.
Baker argues that these women have amassed power not because of merit, but because they are using the immense terror of ever challenging female power to intimidate their worthier male opponents. But the very elevation of these extraordinary women has placed male Democrats in the position of being unwilling to challenge them, he writes. The mantra it's her turn has broad appeal among Democrats.
Reality check: There are twice as many male Democrats as female ones in Congress, suggesting that Baker's fear that women are stealing all the power is a tad overblown. Baker presents no evidence for his concern that the deference to either Clinton or Pelosi is due to gender and not to their political acumen, just as he assumes that Obama's success must be due to race and not his inherent talent as a politician. That's particularly odd when you consider the long history of famously overbearing Democrats, from Lyndon B. Johnson to Tip O'Neill, whose ability to intimidate challengers has always been attributed to their political skill and not their race or gender.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2015/02/03/ross_baker_in_usa_today_hillary_clinton_is_scaring_off_all_the_good_male.html
closeupready
(29,503 posts)are less as we all get to see more of who she really is, and what she's about. And many who dislike her feel that way independent of her gender, but rather based upon her Iraq War Resolution vote, her six years on Walmart's Board of Directors, the Clintons' vast wealth acquired just over the last few years, support for outsourcing of US jobs, etc.
But we lost Congress, and I'm trying to figure out how to adapt to an America which, in 2017, becomes run entirely by the GOP, and a productive path forward.
jaysunb
(11,856 posts)Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)more bullcrap from Gannett Right Wing so called Newspaper. Fake Noise in print.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)2014 exit polls
Wedge politics (e.g. "the war on women" is okay if there are more voters on this side of the wedge.
But it has little to do with Pelosi and Clinton.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Location: Obama campaign headquarters in a strongly Democratic area in a large American city
Event: Obama volunteers' informal chat with the local Democratic congressman
Present: One man, the rest women.
Women volunteer, register voters, walk precincts, make calls, do all the grunt work. Just like in a lot of American homes.
That's why we are likely to have a female candidate in the Democratic Party this time. We women do a lot of the work. We have never had a woman president.
Sri Lanka has had a female president.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sri_Lanka
India and Britain had female prime ministers. (Indira Ghandi and Maggie Thatcher)
Old England had a Queen, a great queen Elizabeth I.
That is just a touch of the history on it.
Women can govern. We are a backward country with regard to the role of women in our government.
We need far more women in government.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)maybe he should try psychoanalysis.