General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums'Evangelicals and Catholics Together' Denounce 'Threat' of Same-Sex Marriage
Some Catholics and evangelical Protestants are putting differences aside to unite against marriage equality, calling it a greater 'threat' than divorce or cohabitation.Some LGBT people and their allies occasionally express the feeling that people with religiously based anti-LGBT feeling usually seem more concerned about same-sex nuptials than other potential threats to the traditional nuclear family unit.
But those opponents of LGBT equality dont usually express that sentiment as blatantly as the Evangelicals and Catholics Together coalition, which is set to publish a statement explicitly naming marriage equality and same-sex relationships as a graver threat than divorce. (It even suggests that a kind of alchemy is performed when same-sex marriage is legally recognized.)
What the state defines as marriage no longer embodies Gods purposes in creation. An easy acceptance of divorce damages marriage; widespread cohabitation devalues marriage. But so-called same-sex marriage is a graver threat, because what is now given the name of marriage in law is a parody of marriage, says the statement, dubbed The Two Shall Become One Flesh: Reclaiming Marriage. It is expected to be printed in March in the conservative religious publication First Things, according to Religion News Service. It also declares that a faithful Christian witness cannot accommodate itself to same-sex marriage, and it contends that Christians who accept marriage equality may no longer be fully Christian.
First Things editor Russell Reno told RNS that Catholic and evangelical signatories to the statement put aside differences of opinion about issues such as birth control to focus on marriage. Regarding differences between Catholic and evangelical Protestant beliefs, Timothy George of Samford University's Beeson Divinity School told the Baptist Press that the people who drafted this statement are well aware of those differences. We have not smudged them or pushed them under the rug.
http://www.advocate.com/politics/religion/2015/02/04/evangelicals-and-catholics-together-denounce-threat-same-sex-marriage
Nothing is more of a threat to life, liberty & the pursuit of happiness, than Religious nuts.
Lars39
(26,116 posts)and contraception.
TexasProgresive
(12,158 posts)William769
(55,147 posts)RKP5637
(67,112 posts)rights. It's the same thing, IMO, fighting against civil rights for others in supposedly a country with separation of religion and government. So much of religion is about hatred and hostilities persecuting others. It's the SOS, over and over again. That's why for me, I have absolutely nothing to do with religion, it's far too filled with illogical hatred and mythical beliefs.
William769
(55,147 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)RKP5637
(67,112 posts)god with mindless flocks following.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)As a left wing, socialist Christian, married for 34 years, I must ask how a same sex couple marrying in any way affects my marriage? My wife knows a same sex couple who have been together for 20 years. They seem very happy. My children are in long term committed relationships. They also seem happy. 3 types of relationships. What exactly is the difference and why are they so concerned about the social relationships of others?
If these would be theocrats are truly concerned about grave dangers to marriage why not ban divorce? Listening, Newt Gingrich?
Also my opinion that any who call themselves Christian should heed the words of Mathew7:1-3. (For all the non-Christians out there that is the verse about judging not. )
William769
(55,147 posts)hunter
(38,326 posts)... was forged in hell.
Terra Alta
(5,158 posts)which is the END of a marriage -- less of a threat to marriage than two people of the same sex who get married and spend the next 50, 60+ years together?
Conservative logic, gotta love it.
William769
(55,147 posts)Oh wait, they don't necessarily need to divorce.
Terra Alta
(5,158 posts)of "Duck Dynasty" fame.
She cheated on him, and all she had to do was ask God for forgiveness and now everything is hunky-dory.
msongs
(67,441 posts)William769
(55,147 posts)What a bunch of fucking asswipes!
world wide wally
(21,754 posts)They are more adamantly anti abortion now then when the Supreme Court first ruled it legal and they want to repeal that.
Now that same sex marriage is legal in 36 states, they are becoming more vocal than ever in repealing that.
Obamacare has passed and they are voting for a 56th time to repeal that.
What is their logic in waiting until something is law to become even more active in opposing the law and repealing it?
Is this by design?
Initech
(100,102 posts)world wide wally
(21,754 posts)guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)By waiting until something passes, think the Civil Rights Act, Roe v Wade, the growing support for marriage equality, the right has yet another example of big liberal government acting against the wishes of "real Americans".
When Bush the Lesser was President, he had a Republican government for 6 of 8 years, but made no move to repeal any of these big government intrusions into Americans God-given right to hate and discriminate against people. Why not? Because repealing Roe v Wade would remove a reason to fundraise, to stir up the angry and ignorant at election time.
Face it, the Republicans do not know how to govern, but they do know how to promote fear and use that fear to raise money.
Beartracks
(12,821 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)...to keep every argument open and unresolved. That's how they attract the freaks who don't know how to think and vaguely suspect that they don't know how to think and latch onto Fox so they have their ignorance legitimised.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)and working with the Fundies and all. They sputter 'it's different' and then vanish into a puff of hypocrisy.
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)As soon as you start sounding like a hate group, boom, you're labeled as such and treated the same.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)Initech
(100,102 posts)You know you can talk all the shit you want about the 2000 campaign. About Karl Rove using extreme bigotry in southern swing states to get out the vote, and how extremist groups like Focus On The Family and the American Family Association backed this up in campaign ad after campaign ad, and it worked. For a while. But the flip side is that it showed us that this kind of ugly bigotry isn't what the United States stands for, and to pass all these anti marriage laws is unconstitutional. And I think that is what caused this country to wake up on this issue. And now the religious wingnuts are the ones who are on the losing end of this argument. The more they keep painting themselves as hateful, the more we're going to turn on them. After all, we're fighting a 3 trillion dollar war against religious extremists, aren't we?
FLPanhandle
(7,107 posts)feel a make believe threat from gay marriage?
Do I have that right?
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)And I would like to add that even the religious who don't think they are among the nuts embolden the nuts with their social and financial contributions to dangerous religious organizations. Every time they give money or any kind of support to the organization, they support the nuts. One only has to follow the money behind prop 8 and other legal fights to see that.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)If you tithe to your church, you cannot try to delude yourself into thinking it's only for "good works." It's for taking away the rights of LGBTQs, women, minorities and anyone else who doesn't worship at their alter. You are giving them money to discriminate and lobby for religious laws. You are killing women and gays by giving them a penny that helps to pass these laws. YOU ARE COMPLICIT.
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)LuvNewcastle
(16,856 posts)to unite these people. I think Jesus would be very nauseated by all of them.
William769
(55,147 posts)"Jesus wept."
Behind the Aegis
(53,983 posts)If marriage is all about "making babies", then what about couples who can't have or don't want children? What about gay couples who DO have children? This "logic" is so twisted that pretzels look at it in wonder!
Trillo
(9,154 posts)Why should religions be allowed to spread their hatred to children and teenagers via compulsory education?