General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUpskirt photos of teen ruled legal in Oregon
A judge has ruled that a 61-year-old Oregon man did nothing illegal when he crouched in a store aisle and snapped photos up a 13-year-olds skirt.
It was lewd and appalling but not outlawed, Judge Eric Butterfield said. From a legal point of view, which unfortunately today is my job to enforce, he didnt do anything wrong, the judge said Thursday.
Patrick Buono of Portland didnt dispute using his cellphone to take the photos on Jan. 3 at the store, The Oregonian newspaper reported.
His defense lawyer, Mark Lawrence, argued that he hadnt violated laws against invasion of privacy and attempted encouraging child sexual abuse a child pornography count.
The privacy law bans clandestine photography in bathrooms, locker rooms, dressing rooms and tanning booths, but the Target aisle was plainly public, Lawrence said.
Upskirt sightings can occur by happenstance, he said, citing a famous photo of Marilyn Monroe with her dress flying up. And that could happen to someone riding up an escalator, taking a spill or exiting a car, he said. These things are not only seen but video-recorded, Lawrence said. Its incumbent on us as citizens to cover up whatever we dont want filmed in public places.
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2015/02/07/world/crime-legal-world/upskirt-photos-of-teen-ruled-legal-in-oregon/
Journeyman
(15,037 posts)davidn3600
(6,342 posts)A Texas law banning this kind of thing got ruled unconstitutional last year because it was too broadly written.
http://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/article/State-appeals-court-rules-upskirt-law-5763225.php?t=53c893b5408b7034ef
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)The laws need to be narrowly written to protect both the subjects of this matter, but also to protect the rights of photographers.
Cameras are everywhere and everyone with a cell phone most likely has one on them. There are a whole lot of photos being taken at any one moment and some of them at any time could be interpreted in a variety of ways.
uppityperson
(115,678 posts)pnwmom
(108,990 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)I expect that the legislature will move quickly to fix this as they did in MA.
pnwmom
(108,990 posts)Its incumbent on us as citizens to cover up whatever we dont want filmed in public places.
The girl was covered up.
The perp CROUCHED in a store aisle in order to take an upskirt photo. Apparently the judge thinks women should never wear dresses or skirts that aren't down to their ankles -- or it's THEIR fault if a man crouches down and films underneath.
Princess Turandot
(4,787 posts)The attorney's name is 'Mark Lawrence'. The judge said this:
It was lewd and appalling, but not outlawed, Washington County Judge Eric Butterfield said....."From a legal point of view, which unfortunately today is my job to enforce, he didn't do anything wrong."....
(http://abcnews.go.com/Weird/wireStory/oregon-judge-upskirt-photos-teen-store-illegal-28781542)
pnwmom
(108,990 posts)I don't think any reasonable person would.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)that they are being prosecuted under, like it or not, that person needs to be acquitted.
Again, the solution is for a law to be passed to close this loophole.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Legal Pot? Help! Save us from the will of the voters.
BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)When things get too weird and wrong even for me,,,,believe me, the world is really fucked-up.
Nay
(12,051 posts)contempt and dislike for boys and men. It's because they are subjected to this sort of shit all their lives.
I wonder if she would have been charged with assault if she had kicked him right in the face. Probably.
alp227
(32,047 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)And that is just disgusting. Seriously. A 61 year old man trying to take photos up the skirt of a 13 year old? I mean just WTF?! That's just sickening. He should be beaten with a large club.