General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHere it comes. We're marching headlong into the next World War.
Every fucking region of the world is "inflamed" with one crisis or another.
I am not shy about saying "Blame Bush." They knew what they were doing when they emptied the treasury into their own bank accounts via tax cuts for themselves and then lied about WMD and invaded a sovereign nation, and set the dominoes falling. It was all by design, because the Bush family (CIA) and the Cheney's have been all about "new world order" and their own dominance since the womb. And now, as the oil industry faces its death knell, we're embarking on a cataclysmic battle to control the next, last resources. It's Mad Max time.
Happy Saturday!
marym625
(17,997 posts)He didn't do it alone but he sure was the catalyst. Unfortunately, there have been very few within the powers that be that have tried to change anything.
K&R
Yes, by design...evil fuckers.
BubbaFett
(361 posts)eternal war is good for big business. Always has been.
Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)none of the countries in the Middle East have the ability to project military power beyond the region and neither Russia or China is likely to take the side of the ISIL religious extremists, especially since both countries have their own Islamic religious extremists causing them trouble.
If you are worried about a potential world war, look to the Ukraine and Russia. How far is Russia willing to go and will Putin back down before Russia and NATO start shooting at each other? If Russia and NATO DO start shooting at each other, what's Putin going to do when the Russians start losing, probably losing badly?
maryellen99
(3,789 posts)I have a gut feeling that Russia and Ukraine is going to end very very badly.
bl968
(360 posts)"None of the countries in the Middle East have the ability to project military power beyond the region"
Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)whether we like or not.
We have treaties with some of the countries in the Middle East and a country that doesn't honor it's treaties soon finds it has no countries to support it.
The health of the U.S. economy and for that matter, the world economy, can be severely disrupted by an unstable Middle East and it benefits the U.S. to have a stable domestic and international economy.
I don't think any of us would like Russia, China or religious extremists controlling the Middle East.
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)using the excuse of fighting ISIS.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)Paraguayan sources have confirmed that George W. Bush bought 42,000 hectares (over 100,000 acres) of land in Paraguay's northern "Chaco" ...
Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)A HERETIC I AM
(24,376 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)Paraguay? Why not!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3183814
US State Dept or BFEE, take your pick, has since destroyed the career of President Lugo, replacing him with figures more in line with the late Gen. Stroessner.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,376 posts)Not much of a "dear friend" as you put it.
Mnemosyne
(21,363 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)there is no proof of this rumor.
zeemike
(18,998 posts)Because Dim Son was just a figurehead with the right name...it was the team behind him that told him what to do and what to say.
Cheney was the leader of the pact...and he clearly is a sociopath, and this is what you get when you put them in charge...Bush is just a frat boy that will show his team spirit.
And I agree with the above reply, the middle east is not the danger, the real danger is trying our best to provoke Russia...then it would be a world war 3 with disastrous consequences.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)The MIC, the Deep State, the PNAC. It is much larger than Bush, and it continues in this administration, as well.
There is a lot of provoking going on, and a lot of propaganda leading us to war.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)Historic records, archeology, and paleo-anthropology all point to conflict being a mostly the normal state of affairs for our species.
True the technology of war has changed vastly increasing the ravages it can create,
but technology has also vastly increased our awareness
We ought not to confuse greater awareness due to superior reporting of human behavior with a change in human behavior.
That sort of conflation of changed awareness with change reality is frequently used to support end-times prophecy fulfillment.
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)Right now there are strong voices calling to send masses of western troops into Iraq and Syria and to arm Ukraine. If that happens all bets are off. Who knows what will happen. Just look at the disastrous results of our previous interventions and multiply that exponentially.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)Of course, escalation always brings in more players and expands the geography of a conflict.
Selling arms also influences armed conflict, especially when the sales are based on financial loans that prolong wars beyond their natural endpoints. But the west sells enormous amounts of arms all the time...we don't fear it causing a world war.
"Bets are off, who knows what will happen" is an appeal to the fear/anxiety of uncertainty.
It's just my opinion but currently the conflict in the region seems to exist under two major influences...
1) the political chaos that flows from 'independence movements' and proxy wars that are part of the dominance competition between Iran and Saudi Arabia, something that goes back at least 50 years...
and 2) it flows from the political and economic chaos that are a consequence of the collapse of the SU and the attempts by the RF to reestablish strong regional influence that provides it real economic advantage.
Cold-war like relations by the US toward Russia emerge because the US ptb don't want another global power setting up once again an alternate competitive economy that shuts us out. There is some reason to wonder if the military-industrial-intelligence complex sees the SU's defeat in Afghanistan as something of a model to work toward via proxy war in the Ukraine. But in that model direct confrontation that some fear is unlikely as the desired outcome would be to simply let Ukraine become yet another place for a Russian dream of power to die from exhaustion.
Of course, there is no reason to believe that Russia will be as willing to commit suicide as it was in Afghanistan. Russians may have traditional views, but they aren't stupid. Russia can and appears to be engaged in pressuring its customers to pressure the US.
Germany and France want natural gas (as well safety for western Slavic states that stand as foils against Russian aggression). IMO, it's likely they'll trade Crimea and eastern Ukraine to get those things. What will be left of Ukraine is a weakened nation malleable to trading interests with Russia. I think it looks like a good deal for Russia which will take all the help it can from the west to prevent it's interests in Ukraine from turning into another case of economic anorexia.
Logical
(22,457 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)None of it -from ISIS to Boko Haram- can be said to have resulted from one cause. The seeds were already planted but it took inept 'gardners' like Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld to raise a crop of weeds instead of something more useful.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]A ton of bricks, a ton of feathers, it's still gonna hurt.[/center][/font][hr]