General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMcCain Says GOP Cannot Shut Down DHS: 'It's Too Serious'
Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) on Sunday said that Republicans cannot shut down the Department of Homeland Security over President Barack Obama's executive actions.
The House in January passed a bill that would fund the department and overturn Obama's actions deferring the deportation of millions of undocumented immigrants. If the Senate does not pass the House by Feb. 27, the Department of Homeland Security will shutdown, and the Senate may not act in time to keep the department open.
On NBC's "Meet the Press," host Chuck Todd asked McCain if the House Republicans' approach was appropriate.
"I think it would be terrible. The American people didnt give us a majority to have a fight between House and Senate Republicans. They want things done. We cannot cut funding from the Department of Homeland Security," McCain said. "And theres ways we can address what the President did was unconstitutional. But its not through shutting down the Department of Homeland Security. Its too serious."
more
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/mccain-opposes-dhs-shutdown
Journeyman
(15,039 posts)And yet, that's what we have.
Same as it ever was. Same as it ever was.
Only now, the people will see it for what it's always been.
Cha
(297,692 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)Poor McCain, always deluded into thinking he has a finger on the pulse of the nation. Poor deluded fool.
onenote
(42,767 posts)You have something to back that up?
Rex
(65,616 posts)I guess you slept through those years.
onenote
(42,767 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)Like I said, the PNAC crowd wanted it and the ability to bet on war...I guess you just are clueless about these things. Not my fault.
imthevicar
(811 posts)because Americans Might discover that it does NOTHING!
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)I've seen arguments like this in the past, and my expectation is that you will be unable to see past whatever agenda you are defending. However, the connection between PNAC and the aftermath of 9/11 are obvious, and many of us remember it, despite the clean-up crews coming in afterwards.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century#.22New_Pearl_Harbor.22
Man from Pickens
(1,713 posts)DHS is part of the global-fascist PNAC plan. Just the term "homeland" itself is foreign to the American experience. We don't use that word, and have never used it. And the "security" part is, of course a sham as well, given that you are much much more likely to suffer at the hands of a militarized cop than any foreign threat.
I guess if they called it the Ministry of Internal Security it would have given up too much of the plot in advance, but it's now 2015 and there's no excuse to still have a positive view of that department.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)Don't mistake the Department of Homeland Security for the individual departments under it, many of which could go away along with the DHS.
Several of the individual departments are necessary and should remain, but the all encompassing DHS? No need for it except maybe for a clearing house for information.
MADem
(135,425 posts)advisory capacity, a "coordinator" of sorts. Next thing you know, the "small government" GOP were creating an entire new frigging "department" and entering the word "HOMELAND" (UGH) into the national lexicon.
http://www.dhs.gov/creation-department-homeland-security
Eleven days after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, Pennsylvania Governor Tom Ridge was appointed as the first Director of the Office of Homeland Security in the White House. The office oversaw and coordinated a comprehensive national strategy to safeguard the country against terrorism and respond to any future attacks.
With the passage of the Homeland Security Act by Congress in November 2002, the Department of Homeland Security formally came into being as a stand-alone, Cabinet-level department to further coordinate and unify national homeland security efforts, opening its doors on March 1, 2003.
KansDem
(28,498 posts)"Homeland security?" If that doesn't sound "third worldish..." (Unless it's referring to the rise of the Third Reich).
procon
(15,805 posts)the inevitable clash between Tea Partyers, Libertarians, and establishment R's is a foregone conclusion. The fact the McCain is so delusional that he either can't grasp that situation, or chooses to ignore it, underscores the divisive, internal problems facing the GOP. I don't see any likelihood that they are capable of resolving their differences before their self-inflicted suicide wins them another "also ran" in 2016.
summerschild
(725 posts)REPUBLICANS CANNOT GOVERN!
spanone
(135,880 posts)dim wit
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Do you also support Ryan's 'Kings don't pay taxes' bill? Why are you still running your mouth?
onenote
(42,767 posts)The 2015 Budget request for FEMA is $10.38 billion out of a total DHS budget request of $38.2 billion. I don't need a calculator to know that 10.38 isn't 85 percent of 38.2.
treestar
(82,383 posts)It has no brain!!!!
CanonRay
(14,118 posts)Thav
(946 posts)After all, personal responsibility is for other people.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)rather than shutting down the whole department. Are they wanting another attack on our soil so they can start WW3?
lark
(23,156 posts)That's why they're bringing in little murderer, aka Netanyahoo.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)CNN wants to be there to film the mushroom clouds.
merrily
(45,251 posts)And, as we all know, our government officials in D.C. are very series people, most especially when it comes to the eternal WOT and most especially warrior McCain.
Third_stone
(3 posts)We got along fine without the department of homeboys security for many years. Then, driven by terror, congress contrived to shuffle desks and create a new department using a name taken from Nazis and adding no new capacity to government, just an extra layer of bureaucrats on top of the people trying to do the work. I see no value in it whatsoever, take deep offense at the Nazi name the Bush family used, and see no loss in getting rid of it. Dumping the extra bureaucrats would be no loss to me, and if there is money left, use it toward funding food stamps or repairing roads, something useful to the people.
GP6971
(31,212 posts)So disband "homeboys".......who then would supply security at our airports? We did just a fine job on September 11th.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Let it die.
egold2604
(369 posts)Turbineguy
(37,369 posts)The most sensible man in the republican party.
(next sentence deleted).
maddiemom
(5,106 posts)Gerrymandering and two senators per state, regardless of population, gave them a "majority."