Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 07:57 PM Feb 2015

McCain Says GOP Cannot Shut Down DHS: 'It's Too Serious'

Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) on Sunday said that Republicans cannot shut down the Department of Homeland Security over President Barack Obama's executive actions.

The House in January passed a bill that would fund the department and overturn Obama's actions deferring the deportation of millions of undocumented immigrants. If the Senate does not pass the House by Feb. 27, the Department of Homeland Security will shutdown, and the Senate may not act in time to keep the department open.

On NBC's "Meet the Press," host Chuck Todd asked McCain if the House Republicans' approach was appropriate.

"I think it would be terrible. The American people didn’t give us a majority to have a fight between House and Senate Republicans. They want things done. We cannot cut funding from the Department of Homeland Security," McCain said. "And there’s ways we can address what the President did was unconstitutional. But it’s not through shutting down the Department of Homeland Security. It’s too serious."

more
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/mccain-opposes-dhs-shutdown

33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
McCain Says GOP Cannot Shut Down DHS: 'It's Too Serious' (Original Post) DonViejo Feb 2015 OP
"The American people didn’t give us a majority to have a fight between House & Senate Republicans."… Journeyman Feb 2015 #1
Keep it up cons VS teabaggers. Cha Feb 2015 #2
Hey grampa shithead, nobody wanted the fucking DHS just you authoritarian assholes. Rex Feb 2015 #3
Nobody wanted DHS? onenote Feb 2015 #5
Nobody but the PNAC crowd. Rex Feb 2015 #10
I guess you have nothing to back up your assertion onenote Feb 2015 #11
Can you counter it with any evidence? I didn't think so. Rex Feb 2015 #16
They can't allow the DHS to shut down! imthevicar Feb 2015 #29
It's probably a waste of time, but... Android3.14 Feb 2015 #20
I'm with Rex Man from Pickens Feb 2015 #25
Not everyone Android3.14 Feb 2015 #19
Wasn't a lot of need for it before 2001 was there? A Simple Game Feb 2015 #23
No--he is making a fair point. As I recall, the original idea was an office in the White House--an MADem Feb 2015 #33
Homeland security KansDem Feb 2015 #17
As long as Republicans keep electing fringe candidates procon Feb 2015 #4
ATTENTION AMERICAN PUBLIC: summerschild Feb 2015 #6
translates to 'it's not politically expedient'. hey john, too serious 'Presidency/sarah palin' ? spanone Feb 2015 #7
What, John? Did they put in a rider to bomb Iran for you? freshwest Feb 2015 #8
Where did you come up with "85% of DHS's Budget goes to fund FEMA"? onenote Feb 2015 #9
Watch out for the zombie Obama! treestar Feb 2015 #12
Kind of blows a hole in Boehner's theory that it's all the Democrats fault CanonRay Feb 2015 #13
But they'll still play it that it's all the Democrat's fault Thav Feb 2015 #14
I assume he means that the DHS is serious. n/t Orsino Feb 2015 #15
The gop needs to focus on eliminating the name Homeland from the Department of Security, Dont call me Shirley Feb 2015 #18
They want Iran to be WW3 lark Feb 2015 #21
"They want Iran to be WW3" Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2015 #27
Of course it's too series! Duh!!!!111!!! merrily Feb 2015 #22
Terrorism and the Homeboys Third_stone Feb 2015 #24
You're joking right? GP6971 Feb 2015 #28
That tears it.... Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2015 #26
So if DHS gets unfunded does air travel stop because TSA is part of DHS egold2604 Feb 2015 #30
McCain..... Turbineguy Feb 2015 #31
The "American people" did NOT give them a majority. maddiemom Feb 2015 #32

Journeyman

(15,039 posts)
1. "The American people didn’t give us a majority to have a fight between House & Senate Republicans."…
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 08:12 PM
Feb 2015

And yet, that's what we have.

Same as it ever was. Same as it ever was.

Only now, the people will see it for what it's always been.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
3. Hey grampa shithead, nobody wanted the fucking DHS just you authoritarian assholes.
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 08:25 PM
Feb 2015

Poor McCain, always deluded into thinking he has a finger on the pulse of the nation. Poor deluded fool.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
16. Can you counter it with any evidence? I didn't think so.
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 01:57 PM
Feb 2015

Like I said, the PNAC crowd wanted it and the ability to bet on war...I guess you just are clueless about these things. Not my fault.

 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
20. It's probably a waste of time, but...
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 04:06 PM
Feb 2015

I've seen arguments like this in the past, and my expectation is that you will be unable to see past whatever agenda you are defending. However, the connection between PNAC and the aftermath of 9/11 are obvious, and many of us remember it, despite the clean-up crews coming in afterwards.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century#.22New_Pearl_Harbor.22

 

Man from Pickens

(1,713 posts)
25. I'm with Rex
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 10:22 PM
Feb 2015

DHS is part of the global-fascist PNAC plan. Just the term "homeland" itself is foreign to the American experience. We don't use that word, and have never used it. And the "security" part is, of course a sham as well, given that you are much much more likely to suffer at the hands of a militarized cop than any foreign threat.

I guess if they called it the Ministry of Internal Security it would have given up too much of the plot in advance, but it's now 2015 and there's no excuse to still have a positive view of that department.

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
23. Wasn't a lot of need for it before 2001 was there?
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 08:35 PM
Feb 2015

Don't mistake the Department of Homeland Security for the individual departments under it, many of which could go away along with the DHS.

Several of the individual departments are necessary and should remain, but the all encompassing DHS? No need for it except maybe for a clearing house for information.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
33. No--he is making a fair point. As I recall, the original idea was an office in the White House--an
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 03:48 PM
Feb 2015

advisory capacity, a "coordinator" of sorts. Next thing you know, the "small government" GOP were creating an entire new frigging "department" and entering the word "HOMELAND" (UGH) into the national lexicon.


http://www.dhs.gov/creation-department-homeland-security


Department Creation

Eleven days after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, Pennsylvania Governor Tom Ridge was appointed as the first Director of the Office of Homeland Security in the White House. The office oversaw and coordinated a comprehensive national strategy to safeguard the country against terrorism and respond to any future attacks.

With the passage of the Homeland Security Act by Congress in November 2002, the Department of Homeland Security formally came into being as a stand-alone, Cabinet-level department to further coordinate and unify national homeland security efforts, opening its doors on March 1, 2003.

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
17. Homeland security
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 03:11 PM
Feb 2015

"Homeland security?" If that doesn't sound "third worldish..." (Unless it's referring to the rise of the Third Reich).

procon

(15,805 posts)
4. As long as Republicans keep electing fringe candidates
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 08:34 PM
Feb 2015

the inevitable clash between Tea Partyers, Libertarians, and establishment R's is a foregone conclusion. The fact the McCain is so delusional that he either can't grasp that situation, or chooses to ignore it, underscores the divisive, internal problems facing the GOP. I don't see any likelihood that they are capable of resolving their differences before their self-inflicted suicide wins them another "also ran" in 2016.

spanone

(135,880 posts)
7. translates to 'it's not politically expedient'. hey john, too serious 'Presidency/sarah palin' ?
Mon Feb 16, 2015, 09:01 PM
Feb 2015

dim wit

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
8. What, John? Did they put in a rider to bomb Iran for you?
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 12:25 AM
Feb 2015
85% of DHS's budget goes to fund FEMA. Don't you want that privatized like your buddy Rand does, so only the rich get help and the rest are left to rot?

Do you also support Ryan's 'Kings don't pay taxes' bill? Why are you still running your mouth?



onenote

(42,767 posts)
9. Where did you come up with "85% of DHS's Budget goes to fund FEMA"?
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 12:40 AM
Feb 2015

The 2015 Budget request for FEMA is $10.38 billion out of a total DHS budget request of $38.2 billion. I don't need a calculator to know that 10.38 isn't 85 percent of 38.2.

Thav

(946 posts)
14. But they'll still play it that it's all the Democrat's fault
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 11:20 AM
Feb 2015

After all, personal responsibility is for other people.

Dont call me Shirley

(10,998 posts)
18. The gop needs to focus on eliminating the name Homeland from the Department of Security,
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 03:54 PM
Feb 2015

rather than shutting down the whole department. Are they wanting another attack on our soil so they can start WW3?

merrily

(45,251 posts)
22. Of course it's too series! Duh!!!!111!!!
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 04:36 PM
Feb 2015

And, as we all know, our government officials in D.C. are very series people, most especially when it comes to the eternal WOT and most especially warrior McCain.

Third_stone

(3 posts)
24. Terrorism and the Homeboys
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 10:14 PM
Feb 2015

We got along fine without the department of homeboys security for many years. Then, driven by terror, congress contrived to shuffle desks and create a new department using a name taken from Nazis and adding no new capacity to government, just an extra layer of bureaucrats on top of the people trying to do the work. I see no value in it whatsoever, take deep offense at the Nazi name the Bush family used, and see no loss in getting rid of it. Dumping the extra bureaucrats would be no loss to me, and if there is money left, use it toward funding food stamps or repairing roads, something useful to the people.

GP6971

(31,212 posts)
28. You're joking right?
Tue Feb 17, 2015, 10:39 PM
Feb 2015

So disband "homeboys".......who then would supply security at our airports? We did just a fine job on September 11th.

maddiemom

(5,106 posts)
32. The "American people" did NOT give them a majority.
Wed Feb 18, 2015, 11:40 AM
Feb 2015

Gerrymandering and two senators per state, regardless of population, gave them a "majority."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»McCain Says GOP Cannot Sh...