Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIn Whose US? Machine Guns, MRAPs, Surveillance, Drones, Permanent War and a Permanent Election Campa
In Whose US? Machine Guns, MRAPs, Surveillance, Drones, Permanent War and a Permanent Election CampaignTuesday, 17 February 2015 12:33 * By Tom Engelhardt, TomDispatch | Op-Ed * Truthout
I never fail to be amazed -- and thats undoubtedly my failing. I mean, if you retain a capacity for wonder you can still be awed by a sunset, but should you really be shocked that the sun is once again sinking in the West? Maybe not.
The occasion for such reflections: machine guns in my hometown. To be specific, several weeks ago, New York Police Commissioner William J. Bratton announced the formation of a new 350-officer Special Response Group (SRG). Keep in mind that New York City already has a police force of more than 34,000 -- bigger, that is, than the active militaries of Austria, Bulgaria, Chad, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Kenya, Laos, Switzerland, or Zimbabwe -- as well as its own navy, including six submersible drones. Just another drop in an ocean of blue, the SRG will nonetheless be a squad for our times, trained in what Bratton referred to as advanced disorder control and counterterror. It will also, he announced, be equipped with extra heavy protective gear, with the long rifles and machine guns -- unfortunately sometimes necessary in these instances. And heres where he created a little controversy in my hometown. The squad would, Bratton added, be designed for dealing with events like our recent protests or incidents like Mumbai or what just happened in Paris.
Now, that was an embarrassment in liberal New York. By mixing the recent demonstrations over the police killings of Michael Brown, Eric Garner, and others into the same sentence with the assault on Mumbai and the Charlie Hebdo affair in France, he seemed to be equating civil protest in the Big Apple with acts of terrorism. Perhaps you wont be surprised then that the very next day the police department started walking back the idea that the unit would be toting its machine guns not just to possible terror incidents but to local protests. A day later, Bratton himself walked his comments back even further. (I may have in my remarks or in your interpretation of my remarks confused you or confused the issue.) Now, it seems there will be two separate units, the SRG for counterterror patrols and a different, assumedly machine-gun-less crew for protests.
~snip~
Similar points could be made about the 13-year-old global war the Bush administration launched and the specific wars, raids, conflicts, invasions, and occupations that have been carried out under its aegis. President Obama has been fighting Iraq War 3.0 and Syria War 1.0 for six months, claiming that Congressional post-9/11 authorizations allow him to do so. Now, he wants a three-year extension on something he claims he doesn't need and has delivered a text to Congress filled with enough loopholes to send an army (and air force) through -- and not just in Iraq and Syria either. Not getting this authorization wouldnt, however, significantly affect the administrations plans in the Middle East. So much for the "power" of Congress to declare war. That body is nonetheless evidently going to spend months holding hearings and debating a new authorization, even as fighting goes on without it, based on informal agreements pounded out by the White House and the Pentagon. (Alice would have found Wonderland sane by comparison.)
~snip~
Washingtons grimly named Predator and Reaper drones have been hunting their prey in the backlands of the planet 24 hours a day for more than a decade now. Thousands of people have been wiped out, including women, children, and wedding parties, as well as numerous significant and insignificant figures in terror outfits of every sort. And yet in not one of those countries has the situation improved in any significant way in terms of U.S. policy goals. In most of them it has grown worse and the drones have been a factor in such developments, alienating whole populations on the ground below. This has been obvious for years to counterinsurgency experts. But a reconsideration of these drone wars is beyond the pale in Washington. Drone assassination is now a sacrosanct act of the American state, part of a global war 13 years old and ongoing. No one in any position of power, now or in the immediate future, is going to consider flying them back.
The CIA has sometimes been called the presidents private army. Today, it's running most (but not all) of Washingtons drone campaigns and so those robotic lone wolves could be considered the presidents private air force. In the process, the twenty-first-century White House has been officially and proudly turned into an assassins lair and dont expect that to change in 2016 or 2020 either.
http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/29157-in-whose-us-machine-guns-mraps-surveillance-drones-permanent-war-and-a-permanent-election-campaign
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 614 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (13)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In Whose US? Machine Guns, MRAPs, Surveillance, Drones, Permanent War and a Permanent Election Campa (Original Post)
99th_Monkey
Feb 2015
OP
"unfortunately sometimes necessary" -- uh, based on what evidence, exactly ?
eppur_se_muova
Feb 2015
#3
bvar22
(39,909 posts)1. Sometimes the plain truth is hard to swallow.
DURec.
eppur_se_muova
(36,281 posts)3. "unfortunately sometimes necessary" -- uh, based on what evidence, exactly ?
Please, Mr. Bratton, cite me an example of an occasion when the NYPD *really* needed to open up on a crowd with machine gun fire, and all the horrible things that happened because they couldn't. I'm guessing nothing you can come up with will be worse than police slaughtering civilians with machine guns, which is what you're opening the door to. Of course, I guess maybe it's more realistic to cite the example of "what just happened in Paris", when it would have been really helpful to burst into an office full of civilians or a hostage situation in a grocery store and start spraying machine gun fire. That would clear all those inconvenient hostages and bystanders out of the way !