General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTis the season for trolls and grifters.
Last edited Thu Feb 19, 2015, 04:40 PM - Edit history (1)
Got's teh feelings that's this election is gonna be swamped with both.
On edit: No I'm not talking about anti-Hillary people...I'm talking about the Giuliani's of the world.
Ugg---No fuck that---Double Ugg!
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)that people who oppose Hillary are trolls.
randys1
(16,286 posts)of the rules here, I sure hope so.
If you want to rag on her after she is the nominee, there are other places to do that, Discussionist for one
Personally, I dont have to rag on her at that point, I am well aware of her negatives, more so than most people I know, but at that point they wont have anything to do with voting in that one election
TBF
(32,062 posts)Trying to intimidate folks before we even have primaries is nasty and unnecessary.
randys1
(16,286 posts)HappyMe
(20,277 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)Are we then expected to support any and every policy position taken by the Party's candidate?
MineralMan
(146,316 posts)Interpret it for yourself.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)Whether or not DU does, is only relevant to here, which was the point I was making, I agree.
I guess the point is, during election season AFTER the candidate is chosen, there is NO point in debating what that candidate believes about anything UNTIL that person is elected.
But once the election is over, bash away, I know I will.
I know that I wont be happy with much of what the candidate will do no matter who it is unless it is Bernie.
One reason a party acts like this, and it is especially relevant now, is as a member of said party you are DIAMETRICALLY opposed to almost everything the other party is for, and in the case of the new Repub party, it is never been more obvious, the differences.
Like for me the only thing worse than a mainstream Democratic politician elected to the WH would be any republican and it would be 987 million times worse.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)We also disagree on the relative "worseness" of particular candidates. For example, I see very little difference between Hillary Clinton and Jeb Bush, although I would agree that Scott Walker would be 987 million times worse than Elizabeth Warren.
randys1
(16,286 posts)http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/02/09/1363380/-Jeb-Bush-goes-all-hip-in-new-technology-hire-will-probably-regret-it-immediately
A misogynist teaparty asshole
You must understand that if John Ellis Bush (we must call him by his actual name from now on) thought that he needed to appoint a Roe opponent to the SC to get Reelected, he would do so in a heartbeat
Therefore there is a MOUNTAIN of difference
Scuba
(53,475 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)Keeping women poor while denying them equal rights is not much different than keeping women poor while advocating for their rights.
randys1
(16,286 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Let me pose that position to women.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)next month, when I'm working a community service project with some youth mentees.
The closest I've come to that questions was asking a couple hungry (because they were at the kitchen) homeless folks whether they cared that the wealthy got tax cuts made permanent in exchange for the government not shutting down. Guess what they didn't "give a sh!t about" (their words)?
Aerows
(39,961 posts)It's way too soon to be waving around rules and talking about violation of the TOS.
Can we actually have a candidate that says "Okay, I am starting my run", maybe another candidate that says "Okay, I'm going to run for the nomination, too", have an actually primary before we start all of that?
Because so far, we've got nothing.
Dawgs
(14,755 posts)Response to trumad (Original post)
In_The_Wind This message was self-deleted by its author.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)We're swimming in zombies of previously banned posters.
It's too bad the dead don't stay dead.
Sid
Rex
(65,616 posts)I might just step away for a few weeks/month like I did when Obama and HRC were running against each other. Just not worth my blood pressure spiking.
This place will always be Fight Club.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)You know....people.
trumad
(41,692 posts)exactly
Shrike47
(6,913 posts)Sarah Palin, Sarah Palin,
What are you, what are you?
Is it troll or grifter, is it troll or grifter?
Will both do? Will both do?
Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)what some right winger says about Obama? And multiple OPs daily.