Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHillary Clinton, President. Elizabeth Warren, Supreme Court Justice.
Or Elizabeth Warren, President. Hillary Clinton, Supreme Court Justice.
I'd be happy either way.
But since Warren isn't running, and time is passing, I think the first option is more likely.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 729 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton, President. Elizabeth Warren, Supreme Court Justice. (Original Post)
pnwmom
Feb 2015
OP
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)1. excellent idea
can you imagine the reaction of John Roberts, Antonin Scalia, and Samuel Alito to either woman as a colleague? Could be heart attack time on the SCOTUS. Then the President could appoint more judges.
Talk about a win-win situation!
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)2. LOL. n/t
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)3. Notice Bush put some people in their 50s on the Court
It would be dumb to put people older than 65 on the court. Real dumb.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)4. Oh, Puhleeez...
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)5. While I'd rather see a REAL progressive, like Elizabeth, on the SC- assumin she ultimately decides not to run for President - you make an excellent point.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)6. So Clinton wouldn't appoint her Attorney General then?... n/t