Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 07:24 PM Feb 2015

The Democratic party *should* marginalize and ignore liberals

Let's face it, liberals are going to vote Democratic because the Republicans are so horrible, liberals are a totally owned vote by the Democratic party.

To the Democratic party every conservative vote they can pull away from the Republicans is as good as two liberal votes, they would be fools not to pander to disaffected Republican voters and ignore liberals because paying attention to liberals means driving away those double plus valuable conservative votes. Nobody likes someone who is right about things and points out that they are right, it's a huge turnoff. The amiable fool is far easier to get along with than the prickly egghead who is always talking about how they got so many things right, look at how popular Ronald Reagan is and was.

So get with the program fellow liberals, if you want the Democrats to win big then shut the hell up about all this pinko lefty crud, all you are doing is helping the Republicans and hurting the Democrats.



153 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Democratic party *should* marginalize and ignore liberals (Original Post) Fumesucker Feb 2015 OP
I hate that "Circle D" logo Art_from_Ark Feb 2015 #1
Some Ad/PR agency ripped the DNC off wyldwolf Feb 2015 #2
Switzerland? Fumesucker Feb 2015 #25
I'm sure it was focused-grouped to death, they have glossy pictures Fumesucker Feb 2015 #18
And in walked the judge... n/t Dr Hobbitstein Feb 2015 #21
...with a seein'-eye dog. cyberswede Feb 2015 #62
Obie came to the realization Dr Hobbitstein Feb 2015 #64
Say it ain't so Alice! on point Feb 2015 #98
It reminds me of a cattle brand - hmmm LiberalElite Feb 2015 #51
I always think it's the "down" button on elevator. winter is coming Feb 2015 #75
So the Circle D is a combination of the logo of a perennial losing team, Art_from_Ark Feb 2015 #81
It looks like a target. backscatter712 Feb 2015 #104
My eyes! That color! Whoever designed that logo should be fired. dissentient Feb 2015 #3
No not Liberals....INDEPENDENTS.....we like Liberal Democrats! VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #33
No, you are a self proclaimed rubberstamp. Almost like being dead, there was volition but no longer. TheKentuckian Feb 2015 #73
Chauncey Gardner Katashi_itto Feb 2015 #105
Why bother pandering to people when you can LuvNewcastle Feb 2015 #4
Yup BrotherIvan Feb 2015 #5
Would you get over the calling people ''hippies''. You don't even know what a hippy is or was. YOHABLO Feb 2015 #19
I think his point was that people who use the term hippies don't truebluegreen Feb 2015 #37
Do it... Fumesucker Feb 2015 #74
Get off my lawn hippies! BrotherIvan Feb 2015 #99
The Republican centrists know they can do the same thing to the far right. The Green Manalishi Feb 2015 #43
most liberals are supporting Hillary JI7 Feb 2015 #6
Not this one. Katashi_itto Feb 2015 #7
What does that even mean? Renew Deal Feb 2015 #9
internet tough talk JI7 Feb 2015 #12
101st Chairborne Bobbie Jo Feb 2015 #60
yup JI7 Feb 2015 #127
Keyboard activism/NT DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2015 #13
. Katashi_itto Feb 2015 #135
But most are supporting her JI7 Feb 2015 #10
So vested interests say. Half-Century Man Feb 2015 #17
no. She has all the ground support also JI7 Feb 2015 #20
And when President Obama was first elected, she had lots of ground support. Half-Century Man Feb 2015 #38
" appalachiablue Feb 2015 #109
EXACTLY!!!!! ^^^THIS^^^ VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #29
Smoke enough crack and anyone would. L0oniX Feb 2015 #32
So all the liberal Democrats that support Hillary are on drugs now.....Crack specifically VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #34
Crack killed apple jack lild Feb 2015 #108
but it didn't kill me! VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #139
Maybe meth? Katashi_itto Feb 2015 #136
+10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Phlem Feb 2015 #84
And that says exactly what? Fumesucker Feb 2015 #90
Macro key! neverforget Feb 2015 #106
it says most liberals WANT Hillary , they aren't just going along, she is the one they want JI7 Feb 2015 #111
Did you actually read the OP? Fumesucker Feb 2015 #112
so try to convince people to change their views JI7 Feb 2015 #113
Again, did you read the OP? Fumesucker Feb 2015 #114
where did you try to do that ? JI7 Feb 2015 #115
In the OP you have not yet read Fumesucker Feb 2015 #117
i did and id on't see it JI7 Feb 2015 #121
Reading glasses, you need them Fumesucker Feb 2015 #123
not sure what that has to do with anything JI7 Feb 2015 #126
What did the Iraq War do for women's rights in the Middle East? Fumesucker Feb 2015 #131
i Don't know anyone who claims it did do anything JI7 Feb 2015 #132
Not shocking and aweing them would be a good start.. Fumesucker Feb 2015 #133
if you think Hillary supported that you shouldn't vote for her JI7 Feb 2015 #134
How long did Hillary take to admit it was a mistake? Fumesucker Feb 2015 #137
wouldnt matter to me. i would not support her if i thought she would have done JI7 Feb 2015 #138
What a change six years make Fumesucker Feb 2015 #142
? JI7 Feb 2015 #143
I'm like Manny Fumesucker Feb 2015 #144
you think Hillary ordered england to do what she did ? JI7 Feb 2015 #146
I have a higher opinion of your intelligence than that Fumesucker Feb 2015 #147
i Don't see england as a scapegoat at all JI7 Feb 2015 #149
I wrote about this on Discussonist.. Fumesucker Feb 2015 #150
And none of that makes england a scapegoat JI7 Feb 2015 #151
Show me where anyone actually responsible had negative consequences Fumesucker Feb 2015 #152
she was trying to make excuses. would you defend chris Kyle JI7 Feb 2015 #153
Big difference between willing to vote for and supporting krawhitham Feb 2015 #101
50 point lead...I'd say it surpasses that threshold! VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #140
Liberals need to do a better jobs of arguing our positions. iandhr Feb 2015 #8
Agree. 'OMFG I hate that!' lovemydog Feb 2015 #14
how about a better job *enacting* our positions. deeds, not more words. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #24
I think people's agendas don't nessisaraly fit their politics olddots Feb 2015 #11
Haha! lovemydog Feb 2015 #15
i think people want fewer homeless. ND-Dem Feb 2015 #31
Most like you and me do. lovemydog Feb 2015 #40
i think the right wing in general would like fewer homeless too. one way or another, no ND-Dem Feb 2015 #83
Indeed, Arbeit Macht Frei Fumesucker Feb 2015 #118
that wasn't what i meant, though. i was thinking more that a large homeless population ND-Dem Feb 2015 #120
Yes look how well the Faux GOP dems did in the last election. Quit this shit. It is time the Vincardog Feb 2015 #16
Do the math.. Fumesucker Feb 2015 #22
Lotsa liberals may just stay at home Joe Turner Feb 2015 #54
Seriously, it doesn't matter Fumesucker Feb 2015 #57
Your thesis runs counter to just the last election Joe Turner Feb 2015 #69
The Democrats just haven't moved far enough right fast enough to keep up Fumesucker Feb 2015 #71
A lot of republicans said the said same thing Joe Turner Feb 2015 #85
You are still thinking numbers when it's about percentages Fumesucker Feb 2015 #89
You got to out of the fixed pie mode Joe Turner Feb 2015 #91
A shrinking pie isn't fixed Fumesucker Feb 2015 #116
IMO, staying home is the second most self-defeating thing a liberal can do, the merrily Feb 2015 #129
You do the math if we put up candidates to compete for Conservative votes who the F will Vincardog Feb 2015 #92
Do the math. Half the electorate doesn't bother to vote because with two Republican parties ... Scuba Feb 2015 #93
The Democratic party does what it needs to do to survive Fumesucker Feb 2015 #95
+10 appalachiablue Feb 2015 #110
Except that isn't the way it is. Marr Feb 2015 #145
Yes & progressives, stop "givin milk 4 free." Make whoever wants our vote EARN it or itll b alot harder 2 influence the candidate on issues. InAbLuEsTaTe Feb 2015 #58
"..then shut the hell up about all this pinko lefty crud" Just what does that mean? YOHABLO Feb 2015 #23
Next to the latrine on MASH? Fumesucker Feb 2015 #26
So are you saying that everyone that supports Hillary Rodham Clinton is not a Liberal? VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #27
I'm talking about the Democratic party and what will put it reliably in office Fumesucker Feb 2015 #35
WE... those of us here.... ARE the Democratic Party....WE ARE the Democratic Party... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #36
I'm not a politician, far too plainspoken and blunt Fumesucker Feb 2015 #39
Yeah we can tell...... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #41
Believe it or not I've come to appreciate your passon and single mindedness Fumesucker Feb 2015 #42
I am not here to be verbose....I am intense, acerbic and to the point! VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #45
Not everyone works the same way mentally, emotionally, spiritually Fumesucker Feb 2015 #52
There's plenty of differing views in the democratic party. lovemydog Feb 2015 #46
Not to THAT guy apparently.... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2015 #49
I didn't read that in the original post lovemydog Feb 2015 #53
What is the cost going to be of the 2016 election? Fumesucker Feb 2015 #63
A lot. lovemydog Feb 2015 #65
Pretty much anything that a disaffected Republican might not like Fumesucker Feb 2015 #67
You've been reading too much Manny. L0oniX Feb 2015 #28
I think I was eight or nine when I read Jonathan Swift Fumesucker Feb 2015 #44
pardon me, but DonCoquixote Feb 2015 #30
That's what I'm thinking ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2015 #72
Dead serious Fumesucker Feb 2015 #76
ok, back when this was a manny knock off DonCoquixote Feb 2015 #103
What I would like is for someone to show me I'm wrong.. Fumesucker Feb 2015 #107
best argument DonCoquixote Feb 2015 #128
I just don't see liberals having a good enough ground game for it to happen long term Fumesucker Feb 2015 #130
Not bad, not bad. MannyGoldstein Feb 2015 #47
Fumesucker, Fumesucker. Curmudgeoness Feb 2015 #48
It's a gift, what can I say.. Fumesucker Feb 2015 #78
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Feb 2015 #50
Venimus vidimus et mortuus est Fumesucker Feb 2015 #66
The Tailor of Benghazi Octafish Feb 2015 #80
Faking sincerity is the key Fumesucker Feb 2015 #82
When in doubt, umlaut. Octafish Feb 2015 #102
Yah, I've been told, in so many words, to shut up malokvale77 Feb 2015 #55
Too close to the truth to be funny ... Martin Eden Feb 2015 #56
Shouldn't we call them retarded before we tell them to STFU? hootinholler Feb 2015 #59
It was only their ideas that were retarded Fumesucker Feb 2015 #61
Whew! I was getting ready to say, ''Let's all become Repuglians.'' Octafish Feb 2015 #68
Well you could try not to be actively offensive to conservatives by disagreeing with them Fumesucker Feb 2015 #70
I noticed they also don't like eye contact, especially not when to be stared at. Octafish Feb 2015 #77
Ah, the one finger salute Fumesucker Feb 2015 #88
Damsnit! Phlem Feb 2015 #94
Post removed Post removed Feb 2015 #79
+1000000000 peacebird Feb 2015 #86
I can tell if this is sincere or not. Phlem Feb 2015 #87
I'm probably better than 90+% of this board at pissing off conservatives on their own turf Fumesucker Feb 2015 #96
amen AtomicKitten Feb 2015 #97
"double plus".....? rainbobryte Feb 2015 #100
I find inmoral more trustworthy than the amoral. At least you know what the sinner is up to and TheKentuckian Feb 2015 #119
Excellent point, I agree... Fumesucker Feb 2015 #124
Only a Sith mikehiggins Feb 2015 #122
So you're going with the "no true wingnut" argument? Fumesucker Feb 2015 #125
L L Liberal icymist Feb 2015 #141
Totebaggers.. Fumesucker Feb 2015 #148

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
18. I'm sure it was focused-grouped to death, they have glossy pictures
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 08:41 PM
Feb 2015

Glossy pictures with circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one.

The best market research money can buy.

 

Dr Hobbitstein

(6,568 posts)
64. Obie came to the realization
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 09:37 PM
Feb 2015

that it was a typical case of American blind justice, and there wasn't nothin' he could do about it, and the judge
wasn't gonna look at the twenty-seven 8 by 10 colored glossy pictures with the circles and arrows and a paragraph
on the back of each one explainin' what each one was, to be used as evidence against us.

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
81. So the Circle D is a combination of the logo of a perennial losing team,
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 10:13 PM
Feb 2015

a ranch's brand, and the Down button of an elevator. Now it's all starting to make sense.

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
104. It looks like a target.
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 11:46 PM
Feb 2015

Every time that logo is displayed, it's putting a bullseye on the Democratic Party for Republicans to take potshots at.

 

dissentient

(861 posts)
3. My eyes! That color! Whoever designed that logo should be fired.
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 07:39 PM
Feb 2015



They desperately need to change it, ASAP.

And yup, we liberals just need to sit our asses down and shut up, we are all loony moon-bat dreamers who don't understand politics.

TheKentuckian

(25,027 posts)
73. No, you are a self proclaimed rubberstamp. Almost like being dead, there was volition but no longer.
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 10:01 PM
Feb 2015

Further, in many cases I believe this to be phony because some people that are pretty satisfied have not actually been tested, it is easy as can be to be Gung Ho when it is all going your way.

Seems to me the centrists and conservative Democrats actually go Republican in significant numbers when they get ready. Reagan is an orphan now but numerically speaking a bunch had to have voted for him and an equal number that have the same politics that weren't in position to sure as hell would have to but get to pretend otherwise.

LuvNewcastle

(16,847 posts)
4. Why bother pandering to people when you can
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 07:41 PM
Feb 2015

ignore them and still get you want out of them? People don't usually have the incentive to fix their machine until it breaks down. We won't be able to fix our barely functioning political system until there is a breakdown, sadly, which means that we're going to see even worse times ahead.

 

YOHABLO

(7,358 posts)
19. Would you get over the calling people ''hippies''. You don't even know what a hippy is or was.
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 08:42 PM
Feb 2015

Such a dumb ass thing to say.

 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
37. I think his point was that people who use the term hippies don't
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 08:57 PM
Feb 2015

in fact, know what that means. It's just a derogatory catch-all; you can almost hear the "dirty" prefix every time it is used.

The Green Manalishi

(1,054 posts)
43. The Republican centrists know they can do the same thing to the far right.
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 09:07 PM
Feb 2015

Who is the Tea Party going to vote for if the nominee is a centrist Republican.
Same arguments and language on both sides. Principle has been in play for many many years.

The difference is that their "base" (actually whacko nutcase fanatics) seem more energized than the farthest left elements of the Democratic Party. I think that is often the case and more depends on the President than anyone else; it's easier to get the 'true believers' active when they hate the POTUS. Worked for us in 2006.

JI7

(89,258 posts)
127. yup
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 02:46 AM
Feb 2015

many come on here thinking they are being rebelious or some shit by posting some of the crap they do.

Half-Century Man

(5,279 posts)
38. And when President Obama was first elected, she had lots of ground support.
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 08:58 PM
Feb 2015

All I am saying is that it is far too soon to know what will happen. All the presupposed inevitability of any candidate could vanish in an instant.
There are those of us who see the holdback by voters in the 2014 elections as something like the tide withdrawal before a tsunami. Rather than hold a victory parade on the beach right now, it would do us well to keep an eye out to sea. If the wave comes, it will come hard. It will be difficult to channel its energy in a direction we want, if we start to act too late.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
34. So all the liberal Democrats that support Hillary are on drugs now.....Crack specifically
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 08:56 PM
Feb 2015

Is this really what you want to say about other Democrats on Democratic Underground?

By the way....that person that must be supported by people on Crack.....polls double digits ahead of EVERY Republican.....Who does your "drug free ass" have that can say that?

JI7

(89,258 posts)
111. it says most liberals WANT Hillary , they aren't just going along, she is the one they want
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 12:53 AM
Feb 2015

or else she wouldn't have much support .

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
112. Did you actually read the OP?
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 12:59 AM
Feb 2015

American politics is wired for conservatism, anyone to the left of Ann Coulter looks like a screaming liberal.

It's like Mach Bands, each of the bars is a uniform tone but they look shaded because of the contrast with the next band over.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
123. Reading glasses, you need them
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 02:16 AM
Feb 2015

From my OP.

So get with the program fellow liberals, if you want the Democrats to win big then shut the hell up about all this pinko lefty crud, all you are doing is helping the Republicans and hurting the Democrats.

JI7

(89,258 posts)
126. not sure what that has to do with anything
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 02:40 AM
Feb 2015

it just seems like internet stuff to me. people in the real world who campaign don't really care about all of this.

the hillary people have been out campaigning for women's rights, gay rights , environment etc. this is the reality .

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
131. What did the Iraq War do for women's rights in the Middle East?
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 03:21 PM
Feb 2015

What did it do for children and gays in the Middle East?

Or do those people not count?

JI7

(89,258 posts)
132. i Don't know anyone who claims it did do anything
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 03:28 PM
Feb 2015

But what would you have done there for the women and children ?

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
144. I'm like Manny
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 09:24 PM
Feb 2015

I can't get past it and it's hard to understand how others do.

Evidently Obama was right about looking forward, I just wish that applied to when the little people screw up, then it's different. If the ones following orders were convicted of being bad why is it those who had a free choice are not held responsible for what they do?

An absolutely classic scapegoat.

JI7

(89,258 posts)
146. you think Hillary ordered england to do what she did ?
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 09:37 PM
Feb 2015

Scapegoat ? There are pics with her in it

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
150. I wrote about this on Discussonist..
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 09:50 PM
Feb 2015
http://www.discussionist.com/10162399

The inverse authority/responsibility curve in American culture

One of the thing that amuses me no end about American culture is that authority does not imply responsibility, just the opposite in fact, authority implies immunity. The closer you get to the top of our social pyramid the less responsibility you have to take for your bad decisions and the more reward you will get for any decision, good or bad.

If you are Joe Coprolite the rag man and step one nanometer over the line you are going to get nailed with the full force of the law, on the other hand the Thurston Howell III's of the world swan dive into the irresponsible idiot pool and get a promotion and a bonus for it.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
152. Show me where anyone actually responsible had negative consequences
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 10:16 PM
Feb 2015

I'm talking about order givers, not followers.

krawhitham

(4,645 posts)
101. Big difference between willing to vote for and supporting
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 11:15 PM
Feb 2015

If Warren runs she will get my time, money, and vote


If Hillary is on the general ballot she will get my vote and nothing else and I will still need a scolding hot shower after

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
14. Agree. 'OMFG I hate that!'
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 08:15 PM
Feb 2015

isn't persuasive.

I think the democratic party should first articulate its positions.

Locally, strongly support living wage ordinances that keep pace with inflation. To the tune of double the federal minimum wage.

Nationally, double the capital gains tax. It benefits the super rich at the expense of the poor. The billions and trillions of dollars do not trickle down.

 

olddots

(10,237 posts)
11. I think people's agendas don't nessisaraly fit their politics
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 08:11 PM
Feb 2015

I have no clue what that meant but it sounded good for a second .

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
15. Haha!
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 08:17 PM
Feb 2015

I love your sense of humor.

I think there's a real element of truth in it somewhere as well.

Like, people want more homeless shelters. But too often, not in their neighborhood.

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
83. i think the right wing in general would like fewer homeless too. one way or another, no
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 10:15 PM
Feb 2015

one's comfortable with mass homelessness.

 

ND-Dem

(4,571 posts)
120. that wasn't what i meant, though. i was thinking more that a large homeless population
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 01:22 AM
Feb 2015

produced cognitive dissonance in people who think this is the best country in the world etc.

I don't think all right-wingers are fascists. I actually know many who are pretty nice.

Vincardog

(20,234 posts)
16. Yes look how well the Faux GOP dems did in the last election. Quit this shit. It is time the
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 08:36 PM
Feb 2015

Democratic candidates returned to and supported LIBERAL values.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
22. Do the math..
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 08:46 PM
Feb 2015

For each conservative they get the Democrats gain a vote and the Republicans lose it, two votes differential.

For each liberal vote they can somehow entice to bother to come to the polls they get one vote. One vote.

Nope, cold hard calculation says liberals should shut up if they want Democrats to win.

The further to the right the Democrats go, the bigger //percentage// of the vote they get and that's all that really matters, absolute numbers are meaningless in a winner-take-all scenario.

I don't like it but that's the way it is.

 

Joe Turner

(930 posts)
54. Lotsa liberals may just stay at home
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 09:16 PM
Feb 2015

if the Democratic party tries too hard to woo disenfranchised republicans. I have to ask though because labels can be confusing. Just what do you mean by liberal. Is it from a social perspective or economic because the latter is probably a lot more compelling than the hand-wringing on controversial wedge issues which does indeed turn a lot of people off...

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
57. Seriously, it doesn't matter
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 09:23 PM
Feb 2015

Percentage rules and the two parties will never let a third party get to a serious challenge, if nothing else they just ease back to the left a bit as a pair and choke off the third party move.

Overton Window, it is to the electoral advantage of the Democrats to follow it to to the right as the Republicans charge over the cliff.

The Republicans basically have the media sown up, there isn't a serious leftist presence despite the Oscars last night, they keep moving to the right as the billionaires wish, the billionaires also keep funding the Democrats who follow the Republicans to the right and get enough percentage to stay viable and win some.

 

Joe Turner

(930 posts)
69. Your thesis runs counter to just the last election
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 09:52 PM
Feb 2015

A lot of democrats stayed home (I didn't) because they were not motivated by what they heard from most Democratic candidates. The democratic party has to start embracing what really gets people to the polls and it isn't issues like gay marriage. It's meat and potato issues like jobs and keeping the jobs here. Public works projects on rebuilding our run down infrastructure. Reining in the excesses of Wall Street. None of these are Republican issues but they will sell readily to the flyover country and make the difference in elections.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
71. The Democrats just haven't moved far enough right fast enough to keep up
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 09:58 PM
Feb 2015

That's the professional politician perspective.. I was related by marriage to a local political family for a decade and some, it was interesting in the Chinese curse way.

 

Joe Turner

(930 posts)
85. A lot of republicans said the said same thing
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 10:20 PM
Feb 2015

during Clinton's reign. That they had to move left to pick up democratic votes to counter Clinton's "left-wing agenda". Still, I just don't know what you are referring to by moving to the right. In this upside world right can be left and visa versa. I'm not a political operative yet I think I have a good understanding what moves people to the polls. The democratic party has to start listening to peoples' everyday concerns and translate that into winning positions on the issues. And so-far they have been tone-deaf on that. They are good at alienating a lot a folks though. Needlessly I might add.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
89. You are still thinking numbers when it's about percentages
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 10:27 PM
Feb 2015

Numbers are immaterial, what counts is which candidate gets 50% + 1.

Long term success in politics is about percentages..

 

Joe Turner

(930 posts)
91. You got to out of the fixed pie mode
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 10:31 PM
Feb 2015

There are new votes out there for democrats to take if they have a winning message. Again, both parties are trying to do the same thing. Lately the republicans have been more successful.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
116. A shrinking pie isn't fixed
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 01:14 AM
Feb 2015

All those lovely billionaire bucks will go bye bye if the Democrats move significantly to the left on economic policy. All the board memberships, the think tank positions, the consulting gigs and so on..

merrily

(45,251 posts)
129. IMO, staying home is the second most self-defeating thing a liberal can do, the
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 04:44 AM
Feb 2015

first being to vote Republican or "Libertarian," which liberals would never do.

At the very least, go and write in the most liberal public person you can think of. That way, no one can spin your statistic as apathy or as wanting a candidate even more right than any who ran.

Vincardog

(20,234 posts)
92. You do the math if we put up candidates to compete for Conservative votes who the F will
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 10:31 PM
Feb 2015

Promote and advance LIBERAL policies?


Your math is backward as voodoo economics and I want no part of it.

You state " The further to the right the Democrats go, the bigger //percentage// of the vote they get and that's all that really matters"

This is absolutely categorically untrue. Look at the last election.

You get a big batch of the STFU you are trying to feed liberals.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
93. Do the math. Half the electorate doesn't bother to vote because with two Republican parties ...
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 10:35 PM
Feb 2015

... no one is offering them squat.

You want to win elections, go where the available votes are. Trying to peel off the mythical moderate Republican is a fool's errand.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
95. The Democratic party does what it needs to do to survive
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 10:45 PM
Feb 2015

Recall that Clausewitz said politics was just a continuation of war by other means or something like that.

I think you and I want probably nearly the same things, you know I'm an outspoken loudmouth in some ways and I know full well how I can piss off conservatives to the point they are speechless with rage and lack of talking points. I spent a while on Discussionist and proved to myself that I still have that ability I honed a decade or more ago.

That's counterproductive though if electoral success is your goal, you have to be nice and accommodating and non threatening to voters and particularly potential donors.

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
145. Except that isn't the way it is.
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 09:36 PM
Feb 2015

Obama's first election proved that. He may not be the liberal he portrayed himself as, but that image and hope for something better brought a lot of new people to the polls who would otherwise not have voted at all.

A positive, unapologetically pro-working class/poor agenda will earn the support of a hell of a lot more people than the tired, dwindling audiences our two corporate parties have made a science of fighting over. The US has incredibly low voter turnout, and it's not because the population doesn't want something better. It's because neither of our two main parties' establishments is willing to offer things that might piss off Wall Street and corporate America.

InAbLuEsTaTe

(24,122 posts)
58. Yes & progressives, stop "givin milk 4 free." Make whoever wants our vote EARN it or itll b alot harder 2 influence the candidate on issues.
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 09:24 PM
Feb 2015
 

YOHABLO

(7,358 posts)
23. "..then shut the hell up about all this pinko lefty crud" Just what does that mean?
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 08:46 PM
Feb 2015

I want to hear what you define as 'pinko lefty'? That is jargon we'd here Archie Bunker use. I mean Really? Oh, that's right, you don't know who Archie Bunker was.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
27. So are you saying that everyone that supports Hillary Rodham Clinton is not a Liberal?
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 08:51 PM
Feb 2015

is that your lousy point?

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
35. I'm talking about the Democratic party and what will put it reliably in office
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 08:56 PM
Feb 2015

The closer the Democrats get to the Republicans the larger percentage of the vote they get, it's that simple and in this system as it exists that's what gets them in office, percentage, not absolute numbers.

You really think the politicians don't know this, no one has done the calculation?

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
36. WE... those of us here.... ARE the Democratic Party....WE ARE the Democratic Party...
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 08:57 PM
Feb 2015

who do you think you are? You think insulting just who YOU think is a Democratic Politician doesn't insult actual Democrats on this forum....because YOU say so?

Seems to me....we have been voting majorities....not fewer....but more ....but the redistricting works against us....

Let us know when you find that candidate who polls double digit leads ahead of all Republicans mkay!

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
39. I'm not a politician, far too plainspoken and blunt
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 09:00 PM
Feb 2015

My ability to gladly tolerate fools is fairly limited and my milk of human kindness is a bit rancid.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
42. Believe it or not I've come to appreciate your passon and single mindedness
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 09:06 PM
Feb 2015

Even though we disagree I see your point, you could make it better but you are enthusiastic.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
45. I am not here to be verbose....I am intense, acerbic and to the point!
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 09:09 PM
Feb 2015

ain't nobody got time for all that jibber jabber....we got shit to do! Its not single mindedness...its called FOCUS!

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
52. Not everyone works the same way mentally, emotionally, spiritually
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 09:15 PM
Feb 2015

What will persuade one person will make another even more opposed, people are individuals although there are broad personality types.

The best politicians don't berate people, they exalt them.

Ich bin ein Berliner.

We are what we have been waiting for.

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
46. There's plenty of differing views in the democratic party.
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 09:09 PM
Feb 2015

I think useful criticism can help make you think and perhaps even adjust strategies, if you (I mean anyone) looks at some criticism and tightens their game.

Personally when I think of the mainstream democratic party I think of bland candidates running on some heavily corporate financed agenda, saying 'I'm Coke. Vote for me because I'm not Pepsi.'

Me & my friends are pretty tired of soft drinks pedaling as candidates.

We want to vote for someone who is vocally fighting to increase taxes on the top 2%, support unions, fight for raising the minimum wage, vocally and with votes oppose the wasteful bullshit of endless war.

That's just my opinion and I vote in every election for the most progressive candidate. If they have a D on their name I vote for them. If they have Green Party or Socialist Party, I vote for them.

I think the D party needs far more youth candidates, people of color candidates, truly liberal candidates. Candidates who say 'I'm not listening to big corporate lobbyists who outsource our jobs.' And 'I'm for strengthening regulations against Wall Street.' 'Breaking up the big banks.' Regardless of who most financed their campaigns.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
49. Not to THAT guy apparently....
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 09:11 PM
Feb 2015

He came right here to Democratic Underground to insult the vast majority of the Democratic Party....because MOST of them support the candidate that he doesn't. I am willing to bet.... that he is another one that says he cannot vote for Hillary Clinton if she wins the Primary!

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
53. I didn't read that in the original post
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 09:16 PM
Feb 2015

because that's not what it said.

I think local and state and congressional elections are very important.

Obviously the presidential one is as well, but that's a long way away.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
63. What is the cost going to be of the 2016 election?
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 09:36 PM
Feb 2015

2012 was over $2 billion, I suspect 2016 is closer to $4 billion with a B.

Good luck raising that kind of cash.

I don't like what I'm saying but it is, the more liberals shut up the more Democrats will win.

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
65. A lot.
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 09:41 PM
Feb 2015

I don't think liberals should shut up.

Tighten their game, yes.

Shut up, no.

Understand that I'm to the left of most liberals.

The only cure for democracy is more democracy.

The only cure for problems of free speech is more free speech.

If you could perhaps be a little more specific though, about what you want anyone to shut up about, that would be helpful.

I just consider posting here as talking. I'm all for conversation.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
67. Pretty much anything that a disaffected Republican might not like
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 09:49 PM
Feb 2015

It's going to have to be pretty bland to appeal to the widest possible voting demographic, platitudes are good and word salad is not usually too hurtful, beyond a couple of sentences most people can't follow much anyway.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
44. I think I was eight or nine when I read Jonathan Swift
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 09:08 PM
Feb 2015

One of the snarkier humans ever to live in my opinion.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
30. pardon me, but
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 08:52 PM
Feb 2015

Are you following the Third-Way Manny school of satire?, because if you are, this gets an A+

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
76. Dead serious
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 10:07 PM
Feb 2015

Percentage of the vote is what counts as far as getting in office, 50% + 1 and you are golden..

It sucks but that's the calculation a professional politician has to make.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
103. ok, back when this was a manny knock off
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 11:20 PM
Feb 2015

this was funny, but if you are serious, and please, I hope you are not, this data would work if anybody besides Debbie Wasserman Schultz does not recognize we had an ass whopping the last two mid terms because of going right.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
107. What I would like is for someone to show me I'm wrong..
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 11:54 PM
Feb 2015

I'm not very good at losing arguments but this is one I wouldn't mind losing.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
128. best argument
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 03:11 AM
Feb 2015

the last mid term where the Democrats tried their hardest to slam Obama and run to the right, ad were MOWED DOWN. Alison grimes ring a bell? She would not even admit she voted for the person most people voted for, and she STILL goy beat, Horribly!

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
130. I just don't see liberals having a good enough ground game for it to happen long term
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 02:31 PM
Feb 2015

Herding cats unfortunately, conservatives tend to be much more organized because despite their rugged individualism rhetoric they are more herd creatures than liberals are on the average.

Politics is a long term game for the professional politician, they have to go with the numbers.

Response to Fumesucker (Original post)

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
102. When in doubt, umlaut.
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 11:20 PM
Feb 2015

Still, I never could figure out the umlaut in the Brown Cult of Long Island pronounciation. Urrayster. Oorstayer. Urlyaster...



Young Guy Motor Detective was the Yojimbo for the atomic age of radio.

malokvale77

(4,879 posts)
55. Yah, I've been told, in so many words, to shut up
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 09:17 PM
Feb 2015

You would have thought the "shellacking" Dems suffered in the midterms would have given the Party a clue about how unimpressed so many of us are.

But nooo, they are going to double down on lame.

With respect to Lesley Gore (may she rest in pesce): It's My Party And I'll Cry If I Want To.



Martin Eden

(12,873 posts)
56. Too close to the truth to be funny ...
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 09:19 PM
Feb 2015

... which is a bit of a paradox, since the ingredient that often makes humor funny is a kernel of truth.
Oh wait, I think I figured it out. You offered up the whole cob.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
68. Whew! I was getting ready to say, ''Let's all become Repuglians.''
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 09:50 PM
Feb 2015

That's where the real money's at. So, for the future of the Party: Je suis Wall Street.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
70. Well you could try not to be actively offensive to conservatives by disagreeing with them
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 09:53 PM
Feb 2015

We all know how much they hate that.

Response to Fumesucker (Original post)

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
87. I can tell if this is sincere or not.
Mon Feb 23, 2015, 10:23 PM
Feb 2015

You got Fumesucker and you got Manny. Both completely talented and unique.

TheKentuckian

(25,027 posts)
119. I find inmoral more trustworthy than the amoral. At least you know what the sinner is up to and
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 01:21 AM
Feb 2015

often even why.

mikehiggins

(5,614 posts)
122. Only a Sith
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 01:59 AM
Feb 2015

would believe a real right winger would EVER vote Democratic, even if the Democratic candidate was Adolf Hitler.

icymist

(15,888 posts)
141. L L Liberal
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 08:45 PM
Feb 2015

I love this country 'cause I can say it sucks
I wouldn't burn the flag 'cause it cost me forty bucks
I vote from my pocket but I dress on the right
I quit hard drugs 'cause they keep me up at night
I'm a L L L L L LA LA LA LA LA LA Liberal

https://myspace.com/theoriginalpheromones/music/song/l-l-liberal-21936734-21737919?play=1

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Democratic party *sho...