General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Democratic party *should* marginalize and ignore liberals
Let's face it, liberals are going to vote Democratic because the Republicans are so horrible, liberals are a totally owned vote by the Democratic party.
To the Democratic party every conservative vote they can pull away from the Republicans is as good as two liberal votes, they would be fools not to pander to disaffected Republican voters and ignore liberals because paying attention to liberals means driving away those double plus valuable conservative votes. Nobody likes someone who is right about things and points out that they are right, it's a huge turnoff. The amiable fool is far easier to get along with than the prickly egghead who is always talking about how they got so many things right, look at how popular Ronald Reagan is and was.
So get with the program fellow liberals, if you want the Democrats to win big then shut the hell up about all this pinko lefty crud, all you are doing is helping the Republicans and hurting the Democrats.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)It reminds me too much of the Chicago Cubs' "Circle C" logo.
wyldwolf
(43,868 posts)This was better:
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Glossy pictures with circles and arrows and a paragraph on the back of each one.
The best market research money can buy.
Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)cyberswede
(26,117 posts)Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)that it was a typical case of American blind justice, and there wasn't nothin' he could do about it, and the judge
wasn't gonna look at the twenty-seven 8 by 10 colored glossy pictures with the circles and arrows and a paragraph
on the back of each one explainin' what each one was, to be used as evidence against us.
on point
(2,506 posts)LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)Vote for us, we're going places!
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)a ranch's brand, and the Down button of an elevator. Now it's all starting to make sense.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Every time that logo is displayed, it's putting a bullseye on the Democratic Party for Republicans to take potshots at.
dissentient
(861 posts)They desperately need to change it, ASAP.
And yup, we liberals just need to sit our asses down and shut up, we are all loony moon-bat dreamers who don't understand politics.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)TheKentuckian
(25,027 posts)Further, in many cases I believe this to be phony because some people that are pretty satisfied have not actually been tested, it is easy as can be to be Gung Ho when it is all going your way.
Seems to me the centrists and conservative Democrats actually go Republican in significant numbers when they get ready. Reagan is an orphan now but numerically speaking a bunch had to have voted for him and an equal number that have the same politics that weren't in position to sure as hell would have to but get to pretend otherwise.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)LuvNewcastle
(16,847 posts)ignore them and still get you want out of them? People don't usually have the incentive to fix their machine until it breaks down. We won't be able to fix our barely functioning political system until there is a breakdown, sadly, which means that we're going to see even worse times ahead.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)Coz where else you gonna go hippies? Eat your peas!
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)Such a dumb ass thing to say.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)in fact, know what that means. It's just a derogatory catch-all; you can almost hear the "dirty" prefix every time it is used.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)The Green Manalishi
(1,054 posts)Who is the Tea Party going to vote for if the nominee is a centrist Republican.
Same arguments and language on both sides. Principle has been in play for many many years.
The difference is that their "base" (actually whacko nutcase fanatics) seem more energized than the farthest left elements of the Democratic Party. I think that is often the case and more depends on the President than anyone else; it's easier to get the 'true believers' active when they hate the POTUS. Worked for us in 2006.
JI7
(89,258 posts)Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)I am now all for just crashing the system.
Renew Deal
(81,866 posts)Crashing what system?
JI7
(89,258 posts)Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)many come on here thinking they are being rebelious or some shit by posting some of the crap they do.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)JI7
(89,258 posts)Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)I am not so sure.
JI7
(89,258 posts)Last time around Obama had a lot also.
Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)All I am saying is that it is far too soon to know what will happen. All the presupposed inevitability of any candidate could vanish in an instant.
There are those of us who see the holdback by voters in the 2014 elections as something like the tide withdrawal before a tsunami. Rather than hold a victory parade on the beach right now, it would do us well to keep an eye out to sea. If the wave comes, it will come hard. It will be difficult to channel its energy in a direction we want, if we start to act too late.
appalachiablue
(41,156 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Is this really what you want to say about other Democrats on Democratic Underground?
By the way....that person that must be supported by people on Crack.....polls double digits ahead of EVERY Republican.....Who does your "drug free ass" have that can say that?
lild
(18 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)Phlem
(6,323 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Did you even read my OP?
Or did you hit a macro key by mistake?
neverforget
(9,436 posts)JI7
(89,258 posts)or else she wouldn't have much support .
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)American politics is wired for conservatism, anyone to the left of Ann Coulter looks like a screaming liberal.
It's like Mach Bands, each of the bars is a uniform tone but they look shaded because of the contrast with the next band over.
JI7
(89,258 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Because that was exactly what I was trying to do.
JI7
(89,258 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)JI7
(89,258 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)From my OP.
JI7
(89,258 posts)it just seems like internet stuff to me. people in the real world who campaign don't really care about all of this.
the hillary people have been out campaigning for women's rights, gay rights , environment etc. this is the reality .
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)What did it do for children and gays in the Middle East?
Or do those people not count?
JI7
(89,258 posts)But what would you have done there for the women and children ?
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Likewise not voting for doing that.
JI7
(89,258 posts)I wouldn't if i thought that.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)JI7
(89,258 posts)What Bush did
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)There were very few Iraq war apologists on DU back then.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)I can't get past it and it's hard to understand how others do.
Evidently Obama was right about looking forward, I just wish that applied to when the little people screw up, then it's different. If the ones following orders were convicted of being bad why is it those who had a free choice are not held responsible for what they do?
An absolutely classic scapegoat.
JI7
(89,258 posts)Scapegoat ? There are pics with her in it
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)JI7
(89,258 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)One of the thing that amuses me no end about American culture is that authority does not imply responsibility, just the opposite in fact, authority implies immunity. The closer you get to the top of our social pyramid the less responsibility you have to take for your bad decisions and the more reward you will get for any decision, good or bad.
If you are Joe Coprolite the rag man and step one nanometer over the line you are going to get nailed with the full force of the law, on the other hand the Thurston Howell III's of the world swan dive into the irresponsible idiot pool and get a promotion and a bonus for it.
JI7
(89,258 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)I'm talking about order givers, not followers.
JI7
(89,258 posts)krawhitham
(4,645 posts)If Warren runs she will get my time, money, and vote
If Hillary is on the general ballot she will get my vote and nothing else and I will still need a scolding hot shower after
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)iandhr
(6,852 posts)lovemydog
(11,833 posts)isn't persuasive.
I think the democratic party should first articulate its positions.
Locally, strongly support living wage ordinances that keep pace with inflation. To the tune of double the federal minimum wage.
Nationally, double the capital gains tax. It benefits the super rich at the expense of the poor. The billions and trillions of dollars do not trickle down.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)olddots
(10,237 posts)I have no clue what that meant but it sounded good for a second .
I love your sense of humor.
I think there's a real element of truth in it somewhere as well.
Like, people want more homeless shelters. But too often, not in their neighborhood.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)lovemydog
(11,833 posts)I'm not too sure about the right wing.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)one's comfortable with mass homelessness.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)produced cognitive dissonance in people who think this is the best country in the world etc.
I don't think all right-wingers are fascists. I actually know many who are pretty nice.
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)Democratic candidates returned to and supported LIBERAL values.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)For each conservative they get the Democrats gain a vote and the Republicans lose it, two votes differential.
For each liberal vote they can somehow entice to bother to come to the polls they get one vote. One vote.
Nope, cold hard calculation says liberals should shut up if they want Democrats to win.
The further to the right the Democrats go, the bigger //percentage// of the vote they get and that's all that really matters, absolute numbers are meaningless in a winner-take-all scenario.
I don't like it but that's the way it is.
Joe Turner
(930 posts)if the Democratic party tries too hard to woo disenfranchised republicans. I have to ask though because labels can be confusing. Just what do you mean by liberal. Is it from a social perspective or economic because the latter is probably a lot more compelling than the hand-wringing on controversial wedge issues which does indeed turn a lot of people off...
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Percentage rules and the two parties will never let a third party get to a serious challenge, if nothing else they just ease back to the left a bit as a pair and choke off the third party move.
Overton Window, it is to the electoral advantage of the Democrats to follow it to to the right as the Republicans charge over the cliff.
The Republicans basically have the media sown up, there isn't a serious leftist presence despite the Oscars last night, they keep moving to the right as the billionaires wish, the billionaires also keep funding the Democrats who follow the Republicans to the right and get enough percentage to stay viable and win some.
Joe Turner
(930 posts)A lot of democrats stayed home (I didn't) because they were not motivated by what they heard from most Democratic candidates. The democratic party has to start embracing what really gets people to the polls and it isn't issues like gay marriage. It's meat and potato issues like jobs and keeping the jobs here. Public works projects on rebuilding our run down infrastructure. Reining in the excesses of Wall Street. None of these are Republican issues but they will sell readily to the flyover country and make the difference in elections.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)That's the professional politician perspective.. I was related by marriage to a local political family for a decade and some, it was interesting in the Chinese curse way.
Joe Turner
(930 posts)during Clinton's reign. That they had to move left to pick up democratic votes to counter Clinton's "left-wing agenda". Still, I just don't know what you are referring to by moving to the right. In this upside world right can be left and visa versa. I'm not a political operative yet I think I have a good understanding what moves people to the polls. The democratic party has to start listening to peoples' everyday concerns and translate that into winning positions on the issues. And so-far they have been tone-deaf on that. They are good at alienating a lot a folks though. Needlessly I might add.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Numbers are immaterial, what counts is which candidate gets 50% + 1.
Long term success in politics is about percentages..
Joe Turner
(930 posts)There are new votes out there for democrats to take if they have a winning message. Again, both parties are trying to do the same thing. Lately the republicans have been more successful.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)All those lovely billionaire bucks will go bye bye if the Democrats move significantly to the left on economic policy. All the board memberships, the think tank positions, the consulting gigs and so on..
merrily
(45,251 posts)first being to vote Republican or "Libertarian," which liberals would never do.
At the very least, go and write in the most liberal public person you can think of. That way, no one can spin your statistic as apathy or as wanting a candidate even more right than any who ran.
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)Promote and advance LIBERAL policies?
Your math is backward as voodoo economics and I want no part of it.
You state " The further to the right the Democrats go, the bigger //percentage// of the vote they get and that's all that really matters"
This is absolutely categorically untrue. Look at the last election.
You get a big batch of the STFU you are trying to feed liberals.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)... no one is offering them squat.
You want to win elections, go where the available votes are. Trying to peel off the mythical moderate Republican is a fool's errand.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Recall that Clausewitz said politics was just a continuation of war by other means or something like that.
I think you and I want probably nearly the same things, you know I'm an outspoken loudmouth in some ways and I know full well how I can piss off conservatives to the point they are speechless with rage and lack of talking points. I spent a while on Discussionist and proved to myself that I still have that ability I honed a decade or more ago.
That's counterproductive though if electoral success is your goal, you have to be nice and accommodating and non threatening to voters and particularly potential donors.
appalachiablue
(41,156 posts)Marr
(20,317 posts)Obama's first election proved that. He may not be the liberal he portrayed himself as, but that image and hope for something better brought a lot of new people to the polls who would otherwise not have voted at all.
A positive, unapologetically pro-working class/poor agenda will earn the support of a hell of a lot more people than the tired, dwindling audiences our two corporate parties have made a science of fighting over. The US has incredibly low voter turnout, and it's not because the population doesn't want something better. It's because neither of our two main parties' establishments is willing to offer things that might piss off Wall Street and corporate America.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)I want to hear what you define as 'pinko lefty'? That is jargon we'd here Archie Bunker use. I mean Really? Oh, that's right, you don't know who Archie Bunker was.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)is that your lousy point?
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)The closer the Democrats get to the Republicans the larger percentage of the vote they get, it's that simple and in this system as it exists that's what gets them in office, percentage, not absolute numbers.
You really think the politicians don't know this, no one has done the calculation?
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)who do you think you are? You think insulting just who YOU think is a Democratic Politician doesn't insult actual Democrats on this forum....because YOU say so?
Seems to me....we have been voting majorities....not fewer....but more ....but the redistricting works against us....
Let us know when you find that candidate who polls double digit leads ahead of all Republicans mkay!
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)My ability to gladly tolerate fools is fairly limited and my milk of human kindness is a bit rancid.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)its called being curmudgeon....
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Even though we disagree I see your point, you could make it better but you are enthusiastic.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)ain't nobody got time for all that jibber jabber....we got shit to do! Its not single mindedness...its called FOCUS!
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)What will persuade one person will make another even more opposed, people are individuals although there are broad personality types.
The best politicians don't berate people, they exalt them.
Ich bin ein Berliner.
We are what we have been waiting for.
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)I think useful criticism can help make you think and perhaps even adjust strategies, if you (I mean anyone) looks at some criticism and tightens their game.
Personally when I think of the mainstream democratic party I think of bland candidates running on some heavily corporate financed agenda, saying 'I'm Coke. Vote for me because I'm not Pepsi.'
Me & my friends are pretty tired of soft drinks pedaling as candidates.
We want to vote for someone who is vocally fighting to increase taxes on the top 2%, support unions, fight for raising the minimum wage, vocally and with votes oppose the wasteful bullshit of endless war.
That's just my opinion and I vote in every election for the most progressive candidate. If they have a D on their name I vote for them. If they have Green Party or Socialist Party, I vote for them.
I think the D party needs far more youth candidates, people of color candidates, truly liberal candidates. Candidates who say 'I'm not listening to big corporate lobbyists who outsource our jobs.' And 'I'm for strengthening regulations against Wall Street.' 'Breaking up the big banks.' Regardless of who most financed their campaigns.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)He came right here to Democratic Underground to insult the vast majority of the Democratic Party....because MOST of them support the candidate that he doesn't. I am willing to bet.... that he is another one that says he cannot vote for Hillary Clinton if she wins the Primary!
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)because that's not what it said.
I think local and state and congressional elections are very important.
Obviously the presidential one is as well, but that's a long way away.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)2012 was over $2 billion, I suspect 2016 is closer to $4 billion with a B.
Good luck raising that kind of cash.
I don't like what I'm saying but it is, the more liberals shut up the more Democrats will win.
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)I don't think liberals should shut up.
Tighten their game, yes.
Shut up, no.
Understand that I'm to the left of most liberals.
The only cure for democracy is more democracy.
The only cure for problems of free speech is more free speech.
If you could perhaps be a little more specific though, about what you want anyone to shut up about, that would be helpful.
I just consider posting here as talking. I'm all for conversation.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)It's going to have to be pretty bland to appeal to the widest possible voting demographic, platitudes are good and word salad is not usually too hurtful, beyond a couple of sentences most people can't follow much anyway.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)One of the snarkier humans ever to live in my opinion.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)Are you following the Third-Way Manny school of satire?, because if you are, this gets an A+
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)But wouldn't give it the same grade.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Percentage of the vote is what counts as far as getting in office, 50% + 1 and you are golden..
It sucks but that's the calculation a professional politician has to make.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)this was funny, but if you are serious, and please, I hope you are not, this data would work if anybody besides Debbie Wasserman Schultz does not recognize we had an ass whopping the last two mid terms because of going right.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)I'm not very good at losing arguments but this is one I wouldn't mind losing.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)the last mid term where the Democrats tried their hardest to slam Obama and run to the right, ad were MOWED DOWN. Alison grimes ring a bell? She would not even admit she voted for the person most people voted for, and she STILL goy beat, Horribly!
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Herding cats unfortunately, conservatives tend to be much more organized because despite their rugged individualism rhetoric they are more herd creatures than liberals are on the average.
Politics is a long term game for the professional politician, they have to go with the numbers.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)I'll kick this upstairs, some "people" will be "interested".
Regards,
TWM
Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)You certainly know how to piss off the masses.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)We all have a purpose in life, mine is being a bad example.
Response to Fumesucker (Original post)
1000words This message was self-deleted by its author.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Once you have that the world is your Öyster.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Still, I never could figure out the umlaut in the Brown Cult of Long Island pronounciation. Urrayster. Oorstayer. Urlyaster...
Young Guy Motor Detective was the Yojimbo for the atomic age of radio.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)You would have thought the "shellacking" Dems suffered in the midterms would have given the Party a clue about how unimpressed so many of us are.
But nooo, they are going to double down on lame.
With respect to Lesley Gore (may she rest in pesce): It's My Party And I'll Cry If I Want To.
Martin Eden
(12,873 posts)... which is a bit of a paradox, since the ingredient that often makes humor funny is a kernel of truth.
Oh wait, I think I figured it out. You offered up the whole cob.
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)Seems to have worked for a certain Mayor.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Although where there's smoke there is often fire.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)That's where the real money's at. So, for the future of the Party: Je suis Wall Street.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)We all know how much they hate that.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)A sign of respect in France where we come from.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)Response to Fumesucker (Original post)
Post removed
peacebird
(14,195 posts)Phlem
(6,323 posts)You got Fumesucker and you got Manny. Both completely talented and unique.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)rainbobryte
(43 posts)TheKentuckian
(25,027 posts)often even why.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)mikehiggins
(5,614 posts)would believe a real right winger would EVER vote Democratic, even if the Democratic candidate was Adolf Hitler.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)icymist
(15,888 posts)I love this country 'cause I can say it sucks
I wouldn't burn the flag 'cause it cost me forty bucks
I vote from my pocket but I dress on the right
I quit hard drugs 'cause they keep me up at night
I'm a L L L L L LA LA LA LA LA LA Liberal
https://myspace.com/theoriginalpheromones/music/song/l-l-liberal-21936734-21737919?play=1