Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Massacure

(7,525 posts)
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 10:21 PM Feb 2015

If the government invested $100 a month

If the government were to set aside for someone $100 a month beginning at birth, and that money grew at a rate 5% above inflation, $605,000 would have been set aside by the time that person turned 66 years old. They government could keep collecting 5%, and provide the person with $30,000 a year, the equivalent of a job paying $15 an hour. When the person dies, the $605,000 could be returned to the tax payers.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If the government invested $100 a month (Original Post) Massacure Feb 2015 OP
If you could tell me how to get edhopper Feb 2015 #1
You probably weren't in a position to contribute $100 a month over the first 18 years of your life. Massacure Feb 2015 #2
I have a problem with that much edhopper Feb 2015 #3
+1 (nt) NYC_SKP Feb 2015 #4
Psst... over here RobertEarl Feb 2015 #7
only if we can monetize them edhopper Feb 2015 #8
I think everyone should be considered shareholders in overall economy. hunter Feb 2015 #5
You are arguing for "dump social security in the stock market" metalbot Feb 2015 #6

Massacure

(7,525 posts)
2. You probably weren't in a position to contribute $100 a month over the first 18 years of your life.
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 10:30 PM
Feb 2015

I challenge you to find a a 65 year period where the S&P 500 has a CAGR lower than 5.5%.
http://www.moneychimp.com/features/market_cagr.htm

edhopper

(33,606 posts)
3. I have a problem with that much
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 10:35 PM
Feb 2015

Public money going into the stock market.
It will skew the market and enrich the 1%.

How can the market reflect buy/sell when there is so much continuous buying.

How about just raising the cap and raising the monthly.

hunter

(38,325 posts)
5. I think everyone should be considered shareholders in overall economy.
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 10:58 PM
Feb 2015

We all ought to be "trust fund" kids, even if it's just a small safe studio apartment, good food, free education, appropriate medical care, and a few generous mugs of beer or glasses of wine with dinner, or cannabis deserts.

Build mindless robots to do the crappiest most dangerous jobs, and make certain every human job pays beyond any "living wage" and is a satisfying job worth doing.

metalbot

(1,058 posts)
6. You are arguing for "dump social security in the stock market"
Wed Feb 25, 2015, 12:30 AM
Feb 2015

Because that's almost exactly what you are arguing, except based on who contributes. If you run your numbers based on 50 years of SS contributions, you may be surprised that you get to about the same amount (on the order of $600k for average salary earners if you could somehow get 5% over inflation).

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If the government investe...