Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Texas Cities Are Worried Republicans Pushed Tax Cuts Too Far (Original Post) daredtowork Mar 2015 OP
Try this on for size. Wellstone ruled Mar 2015 #1
Property taxes are why so many lost everything in the Great Depression. ieoeja Mar 2015 #3
And the the creep affect is Wellstone ruled Mar 2015 #4
An interesting point was how daredtowork Mar 2015 #5
“It scares the fool out of me” Matariki Mar 2015 #2
lol XD nt daredtowork Mar 2015 #8
I live in TX... sendero Mar 2015 #6
How will the cities pay the bonds? daredtowork Mar 2015 #7
 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
1. Try this on for size.
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 03:35 PM
Mar 2015

At some point your Taxing Authority hit the wall when their levying ability reaches 100% and they are not able to collect Taxes because the ability to pay goes away. Texas has to be getting close to this,Real Estate Taxes are just plain Stupid,the wage base sucks,and just how in the hell can they maintain this. Something has to give and it is not going to be pretty when it goes south.

 

ieoeja

(9,748 posts)
3. Property taxes are why so many lost everything in the Great Depression.
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 04:08 PM
Mar 2015

Most people did not carry debt. But they still had to pay their property tax. And most states relied primarily on property taxes. This proved to be a problem for both the people and the states. The people lost their homes. While the states' revenue stream dried up.

So states shifted to an income tax. This, of course, worked perfectly well, even in the Great Depression, because it meant the state was now collecting money from people who were making money and therefore able to actually pay the tax.

I will never, never, never, ever understand rank-and-file Conservative opposition to taxing people on their ability to actually pay the fucking tax. How is that not a slam dunk?

I get the rich fucker who wants to bankrupt people by relying on property tax. He can then pick up the property for pennies on the dollar. He may be evil. But he at least makes sense. But the rank-and-file? "I think we should tax property instead of income. Cause if I lose my job and can no longer afford the property tax, well, it's just my own darn fault, ain't it?"

Is the entire Conservative movement composed of masochists led by sadists?
 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
4. And the the creep affect is
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 04:29 PM
Mar 2015

so pervasive. If you have the so called Media in your corner,bingo,you have a winner. Hear in Nevada we do not have a Income Tax,so every thing is either Property Tax or Sales Tax and some Mining and Casino taxes. In saying that,the Media is already brain washing the populace as to small increases in Property Taxes is so necessary to build a couple of Stadiums,hire more Police,and by the way,the Mining Companies as well as the Casino's need a break. Bullshit,Adelson and Wynn are sucking the County dry. The land that the Casino's set on does not pay Taxes and is not subject to City of Las Vegas Taxing. It's called Las Vegas Township which prevents the City from Real Estate Tax's. It is called Tax Exempt and the Buildings along the Strip are on leased land.

daredtowork

(3,732 posts)
5. An interesting point was how
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 04:43 PM
Mar 2015

the property tax was going up to the State but not coming back down to the local level.

I suppose all the big corporations that moved there (from California) are practically tax-exempt, too. That's what attracted them, after all. That, and the lack of labor protections.

Matariki

(18,775 posts)
2. “It scares the fool out of me”
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 03:51 PM
Mar 2015

That should be the new Republican motto. But I suppose that's wishful thinking.

sendero

(28,552 posts)
6. I live in TX...
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 04:53 PM
Mar 2015

..... if the major gist of this law is to cap property tax increases at 4% per annum, I don't see how that is unreasonable. The only exception I could see would be if inflation in wages and construction (main expenditures of cities) took off and obviously if you have 8% inflation in those costs a 4% cap would be unworkable. Perhaps the cap should be indexed. Also, the law provides for allowing the residents of the city vote on whether or not to enforce the cap. Again, seems not that absurd.

Cities that are growing fast and need to build infrastructure will have to issue bonds. Or manage their growth in some way. Neither seems like a deal killer to me.

Compared to some of the idiocy in our state's gov't, this seems relatively tame to me.

daredtowork

(3,732 posts)
7. How will the cities pay the bonds?
Wed Mar 4, 2015, 11:18 PM
Mar 2015

The article seems to indicate cities are sinking into debt as the property taxes go to the State, and not enough gets sent back to the cities.

Which city do you live in?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Texas Cities Are Worried ...