Lawyer Arguing Against Obamacare: Statute Written By 'White Women And Minorities'

[Triana]

Michael Carvin, the attorney arguing on behalf of the plaintiffs in the King v. Burwell case, said this challenge is different because the argument against the law centers on a statute that was "written by white women and minorities."

Carvin's comments were published in a Wall Street Journal profile of him on Tuesday, a day before oral arguments began in the King v. Burwell lawsuit.

Carvin argued that the difference between this lawsuit and the one in 2012 is that unlike the 2012 challenge, the argument on Wednesday is on "a statute that was written three years ago, not by dead white men but by living white women and minorities."

"It hasn't had time to 'grow' or 'evolve,'" Carvin added, a jab that mocks terms liberals have used for constitutional doctrines that conservatives have argued aren't supported by the Constitution

THE REST OF THE STORY:

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/michael-carvin-obamacare-statutes-white-women-minorities

[rock]

1. His mother was a white women

Ouch!

[pampango]

2. The biggest insult a republican can utter - "written by women and minorities".

Hey, how good can it be if it was not written by white men?