Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 04:51 PM Mar 2015

Why we should not support Hillary

Hope and Change defeated her in 2008.

Nothing has changed that fact.

People on the streets in 2008 told me Hillary
would be the Democratic Party nominee.

But from my reading of DU and all the serious
activists there was painted a different picture.

A story that came true due to Hope and Change.

Hillary is not bringing Hope and Change. She brings more of the same, and that is why we must work hard to find a new and better candidate or we shall suffer under another republican president.

54 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why we should not support Hillary (Original Post) RobertEarl Mar 2015 OP
Your "we" is not me. nt DURHAM D Mar 2015 #1
I will support HRC...especially if she is the DEM nominee for POTUS Sheepshank Mar 2015 #2
I'd be quite happy, if ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #3
I would be happy, also RobertEarl Mar 2015 #4
Don't support her all you want UNLESS and until she becomes the candidate for the Dem party NoJusticeNoPeace Mar 2015 #6
See my avatar? RobertEarl Mar 2015 #8
I wasnt lectuing you at all, I was just pointing out the peril we are all in if she is the NoJusticeNoPeace Mar 2015 #9
So RobertEarl Mar 2015 #18
Isnt what I said, your OP reads as follows "Why we should not support Hillary" NoJusticeNoPeace Mar 2015 #21
looks like a yellow dog to me guillaumeb Mar 2015 #36
Exactly. Thank you. n/t RobertEarl Mar 2015 #39
It wasn't the "real serious activists" that gave us "Hope and Change" ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #7
Not where I live RobertEarl Mar 2015 #12
No shit...I remember it well. NoJusticeNoPeace Mar 2015 #13
Obama has simply worked "fucking miracles" given a. what he was left and b. obstruction NoJusticeNoPeace Mar 2015 #5
And ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #11
And apologizes for the race baiting from back then, so folks like bravenak and others NoJusticeNoPeace Mar 2015 #14
Obama was anti-war RobertEarl Mar 2015 #15
No Candidate Obama was anti-Stupid War. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #23
She has claimed she was wrong to vote that way RobertEarl Mar 2015 #28
Doesn't this ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #29
No RobertEarl Mar 2015 #35
Okay. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #40
Reverse psychology CreekDog Mar 2015 #10
Makes me like her even more too.../NT DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #17
Another Clinton-bashing thread. NaturalHigh Mar 2015 #16
I'm more than fine with President Obama. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #19
Not bashing RobertEarl Mar 2015 #22
Cool story bro. NaturalHigh Mar 2015 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Mar 2015 #44
Thank you for your kind permission. NaturalHigh Mar 2015 #45
ABSOLUTELY, RobertE... MrMickeysMom Mar 2015 #47
That's the question RobertEarl Mar 2015 #49
Here are my thoughts on that... MrMickeysMom Mar 2015 #50
That is a REALLY good point RobertEarl Mar 2015 #52
They'll never admit they they vote for war... MrMickeysMom Mar 2015 #54
I think you make some good points dissentient Mar 2015 #20
This is not being flippant RobertEarl Mar 2015 #25
Seriously? You don't think Hillary Clinton can beat Bush or Walker? NaturalHigh Mar 2015 #27
The election will come down to this RobertEarl Mar 2015 #34
I have a bit of trepidation when it comes to the "smart" Bush, DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #37
The doctors wouldn't let a fat guy like me donate a kidney... NaturalHigh Mar 2015 #46
This isn't a horse race... MrMickeysMom Mar 2015 #48
Not to mention - four more years of James Carville. hedgehog Mar 2015 #24
Another Hillary bashing thread. Aren't ya'll tired? leftofcool Mar 2015 #30
No bashing RobertEarl Mar 2015 #33
she just might bring hope and change guillaumeb Mar 2015 #38
She has baggage RobertEarl Mar 2015 #41
how so? guillaumeb Mar 2015 #42
I agree, but how do you suggest we find the right person fadedrose Mar 2015 #31
WEE WEE WEE all the way home. WAAAAAAA we can do it Mar 2015 #32
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Mar 2015 #43
Yes No Thanks, I'll Support Whomever Our Candidate Is Though... Corey_Baker08 Mar 2015 #51
Good luck with your candidate. So far, she's mine. n/t Adrahil Mar 2015 #53
 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
2. I will support HRC...especially if she is the DEM nominee for POTUS
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 05:08 PM
Mar 2015

please take me off your mailing list too.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
4. I would be happy, also
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 05:11 PM
Mar 2015

But she seems too set in her ways and she just isn't doing what it will take to energize the real serious activists who came out of the woodwork to support Hope and Change.

NoJusticeNoPeace

(5,018 posts)
6. Don't support her all you want UNLESS and until she becomes the candidate for the Dem party
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 05:14 PM
Mar 2015

Then don't support her at your and our peril.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
8. See my avatar?
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 05:19 PM
Mar 2015

Do you understand what that means?

I don't need lectures from anyone on how I should vote.

Thank you and have a nice day.

NoJusticeNoPeace

(5,018 posts)
9. I wasnt lectuing you at all, I was just pointing out the peril we are all in if she is the
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 05:21 PM
Mar 2015

nominee and is not elected, or for that matter the peril we are in if any republican is elected

and my eyesight is bad so I can barely make out what your avie is

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
18. So
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 05:27 PM
Mar 2015

You have this idea that I don't know how bad a republican is? Is this really the level of your understanding and respect for fellow long time DUers?

NoJusticeNoPeace

(5,018 posts)
21. Isnt what I said, your OP reads as follows "Why we should not support Hillary"
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 05:28 PM
Mar 2015

now if you had added "in the primaries" i would have had nothing to add

I myself may not if Bernie is running - in the primaries, that is

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
7. It wasn't the "real serious activists" that gave us "Hope and Change" ...
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 05:19 PM
Mar 2015

In fact, the "real serious activists" were the ones that formed PUMA.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
12. Not where I live
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 05:22 PM
Mar 2015

The PUMA were the single issue, to hell with any equality but their own, narrow-minded blowhards.

The serious activists got out the vote for Obama against all odds and carried the victory for Hope and Change. The Clintons were just more of the same and they lost.

NoJusticeNoPeace

(5,018 posts)
13. No shit...I remember it well.
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 05:22 PM
Mar 2015

I remember a very liberal woman administrator on a board I was active on, all of a sudden when it was Obama vs Clinton, you would not believe the racist crap that came out of her keyboard.

NoJusticeNoPeace

(5,018 posts)
5. Obama has simply worked "fucking miracles" given a. what he was left and b. obstruction
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 05:13 PM
Mar 2015

If HIllary accomplished half of what he has, we would be fine.

She still has a long ways to go putting Wall Street in their place, but to be fair so does Obama.

But Obama literally saved America.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
11. And ...
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 05:22 PM
Mar 2015

Shhh ... the wasn't much policy day light between 2008 Candidate Obama and 2008 Candidate HRC. So ... I'd be fine with a HRC Presidency (should she be the Democratic nominee).

I just hope she retains some of President Obama's planning team ... and keeps President Obama's telephone number.

NoJusticeNoPeace

(5,018 posts)
14. And apologizes for the race baiting from back then, so folks like bravenak and others
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 05:23 PM
Mar 2015

can be relatively comfortable with her.

She owes them, and you

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
28. She has claimed she was wrong to vote that way
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 05:38 PM
Mar 2015

I knew it was wrong then; half the democrats voting knew it was wrong then and the other half were just scared that their precious political lives would be damaged if they voted TO NOT GO TO WAR IN IRAQ.

Please, make no more excuses to me about voting for that war.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
35. No
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 06:17 PM
Mar 2015

I seriously doubt Obama would have voted for the bush invasion of Iraq.

I think Hillary knows her war mongering cost her that election.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
16. Another Clinton-bashing thread.
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 05:24 PM
Mar 2015

How refreshing.

I'm supporting Secretary Clinton. Frankly I think we would have been better off if she had been President for the last eight years.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
22. Not bashing
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 05:31 PM
Mar 2015

Just history and real life politics.

Hillary would probably have been elected if she hadn't voted for bushes war. The Hope of no more war, and a Change from war mongering is what inspired the serious activists to get out the vote in 2008 and get Obama elected.

The Clintons are just more of the same old politics that the young and the old-wisers reject, and will not work for.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
26. Cool story bro.
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 05:34 PM
Mar 2015

If Secretary Clinton decides to run, I will work harder for her than I ever have for a candidate in hopes that she can at least win our primary votes. Unfortunately, I know she's not going to get Oklahoma's electoral votes in the general election, but a change will come sooner or later I hope.

Response to NaturalHigh (Reply #26)

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
47. ABSOLUTELY, RobertE...
Tue Mar 10, 2015, 12:37 AM
Mar 2015

This is what I've kept telling everyone here over and over. And, this is the REAL pity of it…

Had she come out when she had the chance to really speak of what a disaster Bush was getting us ing (which a person of her intellect was SO capable of understanding), she would have had the ENTIRE BASE in her court.

I would have walked into hell for her, but she BLEW it. She FUCKING BLEW it,and THAT is the truth, Ruth.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
49. That's the question
Tue Mar 10, 2015, 01:44 PM
Mar 2015

Did she blow it, or was she really for the war?

Her stances on Syria and Libya make one wonder if she is a closeted war monger.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
50. Here are my thoughts on that...
Tue Mar 10, 2015, 03:13 PM
Mar 2015

Hillary Clinton historically has shown some kind of passion for the women in her own circles and for women of nations without women's rights.

As a woman and an activist of human rights, I believe you cannot have two mind-sets of war and women's rights. Therefore, how can one develop cognitive dissidence of women's rights to change the world by any means necessary, including poisoning those environments through perpetual war?

Of course, I could be kidding myself.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
52. That is a REALLY good point
Tue Mar 10, 2015, 09:36 PM
Mar 2015

How can a person who is strong on women's issues be the same person who is in favor of the worst thing for innocent women and children? I don't like waffles. Or waffling like that. It's just more of the same old bs that got us invading Iraq .

How can all these Hillary supporters ignore that? How can they continue to make excuses for voting for war? Maybe they are not truly for women's rights to a safe environment free from war?

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
25. This is not being flippant
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 05:34 PM
Mar 2015

It comes from over 40 years of active political involvement and wisdom.

I fear that if Hillary is the D party nominee we will lose because she just can't bring what the country needs.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
27. Seriously? You don't think Hillary Clinton can beat Bush or Walker?
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 05:36 PM
Mar 2015

Do you really believe that? I plan to take any odds on that one.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
34. The election will come down to this
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 06:05 PM
Mar 2015

Which candidate can get the most people to work to get out the vote.

I don't think Hillary can inspire the serious liberal left to work hard to get out the vote. She didn't do it in 2008, she shows no sign of being able do it now.

She does have tons of negative inspiration across the political spectrum and that is not good. Obama had even more negatives but he had what it takes to get the liberal left activists to work hard to get out the vote. He won.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,716 posts)
37. I have a bit of trepidation when it comes to the "smart" Bush,
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 06:24 PM
Mar 2015

But I would bet money on HRC against him. Against Scott Walker I am willing to bet a kidney on Hillary. The loser puts his or her name on a kidney donor list.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
46. The doctors wouldn't let a fat guy like me donate a kidney...
Tue Mar 10, 2015, 12:28 AM
Mar 2015

but I'm with you in spirit here. If Walker can beat Secretary Clinton, I'll co-sign an open marker for a casino or something.

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
48. This isn't a horse race...
Tue Mar 10, 2015, 12:41 AM
Mar 2015

We're way past the "our candidate would at least have a better chance than yours".

What it is going to take to turn this whole mess around is real leadership. And, NO. She doesn't portray it.

An Elizabeth Warren might, or Bernie Sanders might, and some unnamed person out there who we see coming out of nowhere might. But, she won't … and WE need one.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
33. No bashing
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 05:58 PM
Mar 2015

History and reality. Sorry if it goes against your emotions. But you are here to become educated, right?

Hillary brings no Hope and Change. She presents just more of the same tired thinking that got us into this mess. If you disagree with those facts, tell us why you think Hillary brings Hope and Change.

Or just keep bashing.....

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
38. she just might bring hope and change
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 06:29 PM
Mar 2015

by inspiring millions of women to work even harder than they did, if that is possible, for President Obama. No Democratic President in my study of history is/was a perfect progressive candidate.

FDR is held up as the epitome of a progressive candidate who accomplished much, but some historians feel that his Secretary of Labor, Frances Perkins, was the real driving force behind FDR. Perkins was the inspiration and driving force behind much if the New Deals' accomplishments, including the National Labor Relations Act and the Social Security Act, to name just two minor things she accomplished.

I feel that HRC has the intelligence and willingness to lead the country in a better direction.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
41. She has baggage
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 06:38 PM
Mar 2015

Obama had none and he was able to circle himself with new thinkers.

I see nothing new coming from candidate Hillary. And I don't cotton to this quote:
"... inspiring millions of women ..." as being a positive for Hillary.

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
42. how so?
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 07:17 PM
Mar 2015

President Obama had no baggage but the GOP convinced a significant portion of the electorate that he did. Convinced them that he was a foreign born Muslim.

I would also not discount the power of inspiration.

fadedrose

(10,044 posts)
31. I agree, but how do you suggest we find the right person
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 05:44 PM
Mar 2015

I suggested polling of every Democrat in any field and narrowing down to who gets the most support...they don't have to be in politics . . .

Response to RobertEarl (Original post)

Corey_Baker08

(2,157 posts)
51. Yes No Thanks, I'll Support Whomever Our Candidate Is Though...
Tue Mar 10, 2015, 03:30 PM
Mar 2015

I would hope you will also support the Democratic Nominee For President, Whomever that may be...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why we should not support...