General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsProbably the dumbest opinion piece WaPo has ever published (Iran)
Last edited Sat Mar 14, 2015, 02:41 AM - Edit history (1)
War with Iran is probably our best optionby Joshua Muravchik, March 13
(fellow at the Foreign Policy Institute of Johns Hopkins Universitys School of Advanced International Studies)
{snip}
___Does this mean that our only option is war? Yes, although an air campaign targeting Irans nuclear infrastructure would entail less need for boots on the ground than the war Obama is waging against the Islamic State, which poses far smaller a threat than Iran does.
Wouldnt an attack cause ordinary Iranians to rally behind the regime? Perhaps, but military losses have also served to undermine regimes, including the Greek and Argentine juntas, the Russian czar and the Russian communists.
Wouldnt destroying much of Irans nuclear infrastructure merely delay its progress? Perhaps, but we can strike as often as necessary. Of course, Iran would try to conceal and defend the elements of its nuclear program, so we might have to find new ways to discover and attack them. Surely the United States could best Iran in such a technological race.
And finally, wouldnt Iran retaliate by using its own forces or proxies to attack Americans as it has done in Lebanon, Iraq and Saudi Arabia with new ferocity? Probably. We could attempt to deter this by warning that we would respond by targeting other military and infrastructure facilities.
Nonetheless, we might absorb some strikes...
steve2470
(37,457 posts)Archae
(46,335 posts)It's the only explanation short of simply being a total asshole I can think of.
onenote
(42,714 posts)starroute
(12,977 posts)He's been a member of every Neocon organization you can imagine.
In 1995, he was a co-founder of the Foundation for Democracy in Iran. And when Michael Ledeen founded the Coalition for Democracy in Iran in 2001, he supported that too.
He was associated with PNAC.
In 1998, he was among the many Neocons who signed an open letter to President Clinton claiming that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and demanding military action.
http://www.juancole.com/2007/06/neocons-to-clinton-launch-war-on-iraq.html
In 2006, he wrote in Foreign Policy, "Make no mistake: President Bush will need to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities before leaving office," and added that his fellow Neocons "need to pave the way intellectually now and be prepared to defend the action when it comes."
http://washingtonnote.com/a_reminder_to_a/
So this is just more of the same.
TheFarseer
(9,323 posts)This was when oil was sky high because they were worried we were going to war with Iran. A Fox news guy said we need to invade Iran to take that uncertainty off the table!
tularetom
(23,664 posts)kwassa
(23,340 posts)The neocons last prediction.
spanone
(135,844 posts)delrem
(9,688 posts)The most disgusting phrase of absolution that such psychopaths employ is "but, no boots on the ground!", showing that they care nothing for 100's of 1000's of Arab, Muslim, lives, and only care about promoting maximum death and destruction.
bigtree
(85,998 posts)...as if that was even a remote possibility, given the limited effectiveness of airstrikes and the sophistry of 'targeted' strikes avoiding casualties of innocents.
The worst for me is his acceptance that 'we might absorb some strikes.' Retaliation likely won't come in the form of mainland US attacks, but open our allies, like Israel, to violence and retribution which would spread like wildfire throughout a region we need to unite, not divide into intensified conflict..
Rex
(65,616 posts)He can even write opinion pieces right in the middle of the warzone. I'm that nice.
cpwm17
(3,829 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)delrem
(9,688 posts)A good man who continues to do good throughout his life.
Bradical79
(4,490 posts)From his wikipedia bibliography:
"Bomb Iran," The Los Angeles Times, November 19, 2006
Yeah... I'm going to ignore this guy.
edhopper
(33,587 posts)Cause the WSJ has published so many dumb shit editorials.
But you might be right.