Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEmployees covered by collectively bargained contracts 68% - 90% in Europe, 12% in the US.
Strong unions, strong productivityUnionization in the United States has declined since the late 1970s, when 27% of U.S. workers were covered by union contracts, to today, when only about 12% are covered. This has had substantial adverse effects on inequality, the wages of typical workers, and pension and health benefit coverage.
By contrast, most of the major continental European countries have maintained strong unions, and most of their employees are covered by collectively bargained contracts, ranging from 68% in Germany to over 90% in Belgium, France, and Sweden (see the first chart below).
There is a common myth that unions hurt productivity, supposedly because they impose work rules that make their employers less efficient. The evidence from industrial relations studies does not support this myth. A broad study of the economics literature found a positive association [of unions on productivity] is established for the United States in general and for U.S. manufacturing in particular (Doucouliagos and Laroche 2003, 1).1 And as the second chart below reveals, international comparisons suggest that high productivity and very high union density are entirely compatible.
If Congress is concerned about protecting middle-class incomes, it should pass measures to facilitate union organizing and collective bargaining coverage. There is no reason to fear that higher rates of unionization will impede efficiency or labor productivity.
http://www.epi.org/publication/webfeatures_snapshots_20070620/
The positive correlation between unions and productivity in the US puts to lie republican contentions that unions inhibit it. The productivity of labor in Europe (which is largely unionized) compares very favorably with the US.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 444 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Employees covered by collectively bargained contracts 68% - 90% in Europe, 12% in the US. (Original Post)
pampango
Mar 2015
OP
part of this is the unions fault rather than fight and educate they chose the go-along-to-get-along
Romeo.lima333
Mar 2015
#1
It's much harder to organize here than than in Europe. Also they have card check only just to
demosincebirth
Mar 2015
#4
I think it is safe to say that they don't have Taft-Hartley style "right-to-work" laws either. n/t
pampango
Mar 2015
#5
This shows the power of lies, lies that led to the ruin of the middle class
AZ Progressive
Mar 2015
#6
Romeo.lima333
(1,127 posts)1. part of this is the unions fault rather than fight and educate they chose the go-along-to-get-along
model that has soured itself to it members
demosincebirth
(12,541 posts)4. It's much harder to organize here than than in Europe. Also they have card check only just to
Organize a union. Here -- it's an election process that may take months and that benifits the employer.
pampango
(24,692 posts)5. I think it is safe to say that they don't have Taft-Hartley style "right-to-work" laws either. n/t
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)6. This shows the power of lies, lies that led to the ruin of the middle class
as well as the consequences when people (union leaders in this case) don't fight back.