Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

antigop

(12,778 posts)
Thu Apr 9, 2015, 09:07 PM Apr 2015

Sen. Elizabeth Warren: Hillary Clinton needs to state her position on Trans-Pacific Partnership

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2015/04/sen-elizabeth-warren-hillary-clinton-needs-to-state-her-position-on-trans-pacific-partnership/

Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren on Thursday said Hillary Clinton should stake out a position on a multi-nation trade deal being finalized by the Obama administration.

Warren, in an interview broadcast Thursday on CBS “This Morning,” said that she will say where she stands on “all of the key issues, it’s up to others to say whether they stand there as well, or if they stand in some different place.”
...
CBS host Charlie Rose asked Warren to name one issue on which she would like to see Clinton delineate a stance. Warren pointed out the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a free trade agreement between the U.S. and 11 other countries being negotiated by the administration, which will need approval from the Republican-controlled U.S. Congress.

“You know we have a big debate going on right now on trade within the Democratic Party,” Warren said, citing her opposition to dispute-resolution language in the trade pact.
48 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sen. Elizabeth Warren: Hillary Clinton needs to state her position on Trans-Pacific Partnership (Original Post) antigop Apr 2015 OP
Hillary's Business Legacy at State Dept (leading part in drafting TPP) antigop Apr 2015 #1
Didn't know it was Commerce Secretary, thought it was Secy. of State appalachiablue Apr 2015 #28
perfect timing DonCoquixote Apr 2015 #2
K & R !!! WillyT Apr 2015 #3
Please cross post this in the Elizabeth Warren group Autumn Apr 2015 #4
go right ahead. nt antigop Apr 2015 #6
MSNBC: Hillary Clinton Stays Silent On TPP (Video) antigop Apr 2015 #5
Well according to a graph put out by people that say to take their methodology with a grain of salt Dragonfli Apr 2015 #7
Graphs are fantastic, Dragonfli! delrem Apr 2015 #14
If you like graphs, you will love this: Dragonfli Apr 2015 #15
I like the bottom one. delrem Apr 2015 #17
Red spot 2012!! Dragonfli Apr 2015 #26
She'll try to say she doesn't support outsourcing the TPP supports but she DOES support "insourcing" cascadiance Apr 2015 #30
HRC has said, "Outsourcing will continue..." antigop Apr 2015 #32
also, the biggest users of h-1b visas are OUTSOURCING COMPANIES antigop Apr 2015 #35
The slang term for these companies for decades has been "body shops"... cascadiance Apr 2015 #37
wow -- even Fox News reports on bipartisan investigation antigop Apr 2015 #38
Yep, the stance against corporatists and for a huge group of voters (MANY independents)... cascadiance Apr 2015 #39
I agree with you 100%. I see a lot of Repubs in the IT field who are fed up with h-1b expansion. antigop Apr 2015 #40
And those still questioning our stances should look at the H-2B visa abuses after Katrina... cascadiance Apr 2015 #41
don't you wonder what Hillary supporters do for a living? antigop Apr 2015 #42
What do they do, probably follow investments some, glance at a statement once a month- appalachiablue Apr 2015 #43
As an IT worker, I despise H1-B's with a passion Smithryee Apr 2015 #45
I suppose since Dems. are part of the H1-B problem, like the Banks (Glass Steagall) they can't appalachiablue Apr 2015 #44
Since Hillary selected Sunday to announce, the very time the TPP is hoped to be passed by appalachiablue Apr 2015 #46
on Yahoo! News antigop Apr 2015 #8
K and R Faryn Balyncd Apr 2015 #9
Keep Kicking. Will Hillary speak about the TPP Monday since she chose to announce the week it's appalachiablue Apr 2015 #47
These don't count? nationalize the fed Apr 2015 #10
thanks. I was looking for those. nt antigop Apr 2015 #11
Nope! delrem Apr 2015 #12
I remember how Hillary Clinton voted in the Senate on the Central American Free Trade Agreement. Bluenorthwest Apr 2015 #36
In that last clip, (will be) Pres Obama is very impressive. delrem Apr 2015 #22
That Warren Lady RobertEarl Apr 2015 #13
Draft her? InAbLuEsTaTe Apr 2015 #16
It could happen RobertEarl Apr 2015 #27
while she does it wont make much difference in the support she gets JI7 Apr 2015 #18
I think everybody supports "free trade". delrem Apr 2015 #19
Free trade for whom? What do the Working Class get out of all these 'free trade giveaways' that sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #20
YES! he said, YES! YES! YES! delrem Apr 2015 #21
+ another Scuba Apr 2015 #23
+1! Enthusiast Apr 2015 #24
she can't say anything because she was a part of it. Warren knows this. That's the beauty of it. antigop Apr 2015 #25
Yes, Warren is very smart. And she's RIGHT. Clinton needs to let the public know, since she's sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #29
sabrina, I think you missed my point. antigop Apr 2015 #31
I agree, I did get your point, but didn't express myself very well. And yes, Warren has sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #33
ok. I agree with you...I think that if HRC responds at all it will be along the lines of what you antigop Apr 2015 #34
You don't need to consult Miss Cleo to know where that compass is going to point.. L0oniX Apr 2015 #48

antigop

(12,778 posts)
1. Hillary's Business Legacy at State Dept (leading part in drafting TPP)
Thu Apr 9, 2015, 09:10 PM
Apr 2015
http://www.democraticunderground.com/101667554

On her 79th and probably last overseas trip as secretary of state, Hillary Clinton made a pit stop in the Czech Republic. One purpose of the 11-hour visit on Dec. 3, squeezed between NATO talks on the future of Afghanistan and the Syrian civil war, was to make a personal appeal to Czech Prime Minister Petr Nečas on behalf of Westinghouse Electric, which is vying for a contract to build a nuclear power plant there. The company is locked in a $10 billion bidding war with a state-owned Russian energy giant, and Clinton pressed the Czech officials about the wisdom of depending on Vladimir Putin’s Russia for something as essential as electricity. Westinghouse Chief Executive Danny Roderick, who’s still awaiting a decision, says Clinton’s intervention made a big impression on the Czechs: “I was proud that she was in the trenches with me.”

In four years as the nation’s top diplomat, Clinton, who is expected to step down this month, has made dozens of similar sales pitches on behalf of U.S. companies. In 2009 she toured a Boeing plant in Moscow and met with Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov to persuade state-owned Russian Technologies to buy 50 Boeing 737s instead of jets made by Airbus. That $3.7 billion deal was one of several large contracts Clinton helped clinch for Boeing (BA). In December 2011, Lockheed Martin (LMT) announced a $7.2 billion deal to upgrade Japan’s aging fighter jet fleet, beating out Eurofighter. Clinton advocated for the contract with her Japanese counterpart at the United Nations General Assembly. In February 2012, Space Systems/Loral, which builds communications satellites in Palo Alto, won a contract for equipment to create a national broadband network in Australia. Clinton met with former Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd several times to press for the deal. Last summer, Clinton’s undersecretary for economic growth, Robert Hormats, a former Goldman Sachs (GS) vice chair, took executives from Google (GOOG), MasterCard (MA), and Dow Chemical (DOW) to Myanmar to network with government officials, the first such meeting since sanctions against the country were lifted in 2012.

...
She’s pressed the case for U.S. business in Cambodia, Singapore, Vietnam, Indonesia, and other countries in China’s shadow. She’s also taken a leading part in drafting the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the free-trade pact that would give U.S. companies a leg up on their Chinese competitors.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
2. perfect timing
Thu Apr 9, 2015, 09:10 PM
Apr 2015

As Hillary will start running officaly on Sunday, she will need to state her positions on issue like the TPP. iF Liz were trying to run against Hillary, this would be a fine way to press Hillary to speak.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
7. Well according to a graph put out by people that say to take their methodology with a grain of salt
Thu Apr 9, 2015, 09:29 PM
Apr 2015

Hillary Clinton is a far left fringe politician, so of course she opposes the TPP.

Only right of center corporatists would approve of something so harmful to working Americans that grants sovereignty to foreign corporations at our expense. Duh.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
14. Graphs are fantastic, Dragonfli!
Thu Apr 9, 2015, 11:23 PM
Apr 2015

They eliminate the need for words, for thoughts, for analysis, and they immediately pinpoint The Truth.
It doesn't matter what graph! But I do recommend choosing graphs that make you feel good. Else where's the point?
I like the graph that pinpoints HRC as exactly, with no deviation even an iota, at the center of the center-left. That graph perfectly matches my mind

I like graphs even more than I like PEW polls.
Tho' I've gotta say, I love me some PEW polls!
I can't remember the exact moment I found out about the wonders of PEW polls, I guess I wasn't paying attention (heh, strike the words "I guess", 'cause when have I ever?), but now that I've discovered PEW polls it's like riding down a slide slicked with mineral oil. Sweet.
And if there's a likeable graph at the end, it's heaven.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
15. If you like graphs, you will love this:
Thu Apr 9, 2015, 11:38 PM
Apr 2015
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12775222

You will have to forget the one at thy top however, it will not reinforce the actual truth you envision that absolutely must be the correct reading. Forgetting is easy, it is also the road to happiness.

I heard there was a war once, but I forget if it really happened, so I know it didn't.

delrem

(9,688 posts)
17. I like the bottom one.
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 01:03 AM
Apr 2015

It has a square inside diamonds inside diamonds, and one non-confusing red spot.
I think the red spot should've been better centered in the "left liberal" diamond, for better impact. But that's just personal opinion, probably the result of my ODD (oppositional defiant disorder), which I'm being treated for but, y'know, it's catch-22 since because of my ODD I won't take the medications!

In any case my vote goes to that red spot!

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
26. Red spot 2012!!
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 11:14 AM
Apr 2015

A candidate for 100% of geometric shapes.

Don't worry, If we run a teal spot from the appropriate square in the primary, that dot can be brought to perfect center of the left liberal diamond, Major graphic artists have already been chosen and hired for staff.

Join the movement, believe in the graphic


 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
30. She'll try to say she doesn't support outsourcing the TPP supports but she DOES support "insourcing"
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 05:22 PM
Apr 2015

... when she has been on the record for supporting H-1B quota expansion...

antigop

(12,778 posts)
32. HRC has said, "Outsourcing will continue..."
Sat Apr 11, 2015, 02:35 PM
Apr 2015
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/07/AR2007090702780.html

When Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton flew to New Delhi to meet with Indian business leaders in 2005, she offered a blunt assessment of the loss of American jobs across the Pacific. "There is no way to legislate against reality," she declared. "Outsourcing will continue. . . . We are not against all outsourcing; we are not in favor of putting up fences."


The Clinton camp STILL doesn't get it that this was one of many reasons she lost in 2008. It ticked off a lot of people.


antigop

(12,778 posts)
35. also, the biggest users of h-1b visas are OUTSOURCING COMPANIES
Sat Apr 11, 2015, 03:18 PM
Apr 2015

Who's Hiring H-1B Visa Workers? It's Not Who You Might Think
http://www.npr.org/blogs/alltechconsidered/2013/04/03/176134694/Whos-Hiring-H1-B-Visa-Workers-Its-Not-Who-You-Might-Think

The tech industry wants more skilled workers — from overseas. Companies are lobbying hard for Congress to raise the limit on H-1B visas — visas for people with specialized skills — researchers, for instance, or software engineers.

Brad Smith, Microsoft's general counsel, recently told NPR that more H-1B visas can't help but be good for the country.

"We need to continue to attract some of the best and brightest people in the world to come and join us in world-leading [research and development] efforts," Smith said.

But that "best-and-brightest" argument doesn't quite match up with reality — especially when you look at which companies are using the most H-1Bs.

Who Is Using the Visas?

If you scroll through the government's visa data, you notice something surprising. The biggest employer of foreign tech workers is not Microsoft — not by a long shot. Nor is it Google, Facebook or any other name-brand tech company. The biggest users of H-1Bs are consulting companies, or as Ron Hira calls them, "offshore-outsourcing firms."
 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
37. The slang term for these companies for decades has been "body shops"...
Sat Apr 11, 2015, 05:23 PM
Apr 2015

Wikipedia's history on them...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_shopping

NBC had investigated this indentured servant practice earlier...

http://www.nbcbayarea.com/investigations/Silicon-Valleys-Body-Shop-Secret-280567322.html

The gentleman interviewed here shows how it is Indian workers that also resent this kind of exploitation as well, and which is why

H-!B SHOULD BE SHUT DOWN!!!!!

... NOT expanded that apparently Hillary Clinton wants to happen likely to satisfy other wealth donors the way she does on so many other issues.

I personally witnessed a "guesthouse" defined here which happened when my neighbor moved out of a 900 SQ foot apartment across the hall from me, not long before I left that place as well, when rents were being jacked up heavily during the dotcom meltdown.

They all arbitrarily got kicked out suddenly when the one guy that hired them wanted to take over that apartment for himself.

antigop

(12,778 posts)
38. wow -- even Fox News reports on bipartisan investigation
Sat Apr 11, 2015, 05:32 PM
Apr 2015
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/04/10/senators-seek-probe-claims-thousands-us-workers-fired-forced-to-train-foreign/

A popular visa program allegedly is being misused by U.S. companies to lay off thousands of American workers and replace them with foreign labor.

And, adding insult to injury, many of the laid-off workers allegedly have been forced to train their replacements, in what one anonymous whistleblower called a “humiliating” experience.

The allegations have caught the attention of a bipartisan group of senators -- including immigration hawk Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., and the No. 2 Senate Democrat, Illinois’ Dick Durbin -- who are calling for a federal probe. A letter sent by 10 senators urging an investigation specifically cited reports of the firing and hiring practices at Southern California Edison, California's second-largest utility. The incidents are concentrated in the IT field, and involve American workers being replaced by H-1B visa holders.

“A number of U.S. employers, including some large, well-known, publicly-traded corporations, have reportedly laid off thousands of American workers and replaced them with H-1B visa holders,” the senators wrote.


 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
39. Yep, the stance against corporatists and for a huge group of voters (MANY independents)...
Sat Apr 11, 2015, 05:42 PM
Apr 2015

... would be AGAINST H-1B expansion.

There are many independent and libertarian voters in the IT field, and many have been bitten by body shops. I think if the Democrats were to really do some hard work in fixing this problem instead of aiding and abetting it, they'd get a lot of votes from not just Democratic Party voters.

What really bugs me is that Schumer, Reid's replacement leading the Democrats in the Senate, has been the biggest "tool" of those passing H-1B expansion from the Democratic Party side over the years. Look at his voting record and how he has always been the "central figure" working with Republicans to hash out the details of these "giveaway" H-1B expansion deals that have hurt us so much over the years.

antigop

(12,778 posts)
40. I agree with you 100%. I see a lot of Repubs in the IT field who are fed up with h-1b expansion.
Sat Apr 11, 2015, 05:45 PM
Apr 2015

The Dems are missing a huge opportunity among those who have been burned (or know someone who has been burned) by h-1b visa expansions.

Also L1's.

eta: And the Clinton camp STILL does not realize how much they ticked off IT/engineers in the 2008 campaign.

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
41. And those still questioning our stances should look at the H-2B visa abuses after Katrina...
Sat Apr 11, 2015, 05:49 PM
Apr 2015

There was some real horrible abuse there, that not only screwed many foreign nationals coming here to help rebuild the south then, but that effort really should have been looking to hire American employees down there that sorely needed jobs, etc. to rebuild their lives and could be something they could have put pride in to in rebuilding what they'd lost then.

http://www.thenation.com/blog/198665/these-workers-came-overseas-help-rebuild-after-hurricane-katrina-and-were-treated-prison

antigop

(12,778 posts)
42. don't you wonder what Hillary supporters do for a living?
Sat Apr 11, 2015, 05:53 PM
Apr 2015

What, exactly, do they do that they don't care about outsourcing or h-1b replacements?

What do their families do?

I guess you know the answer to that.

 

Smithryee

(157 posts)
45. As an IT worker, I despise H1-B's with a passion
Sat Apr 11, 2015, 07:42 PM
Apr 2015

I get job opportunities from out of state, with impossibily long requirements.

Those are from body shops for H1-B's. I want to get them for spamming me unceasingly and I plan to make an example out of them this summer.

Starting with small claims court... (I did issue a warning to the CEO last year that was ignored for each spam that they send me will cost them $500) - I plan to make a claim the maximum allowable by Smalls Claim Court. I think that is $2,500 - twice a year.


appalachiablue

(41,168 posts)
44. I suppose since Dems. are part of the H1-B problem, like the Banks (Glass Steagall) they can't
Sat Apr 11, 2015, 07:36 PM
Apr 2015

really talk about the issue? They'd have to stop H1-B expansion immediately, and there's ongoing buy-partisan work now. How corrupt-

appalachiablue

(41,168 posts)
46. Since Hillary selected Sunday to announce, the very time the TPP is hoped to be passed by
Sat Apr 11, 2015, 10:04 PM
Apr 2015

corporate interests- I think Monday is a perfect time for her to speak about the TPP.

KEEP THIS KICKED!

appalachiablue

(41,168 posts)
47. Keep Kicking. Will Hillary speak about the TPP Monday since she chose to announce the week it's
Sat Apr 11, 2015, 10:07 PM
Apr 2015

planned to pass, unless enough people sign the MoveOn/Bernie petition or call their Senators offices in DC.

nationalize the fed

(2,169 posts)
10. These don't count?
Thu Apr 9, 2015, 10:07 PM
Apr 2015




What did Hillary Rodham Clinton say about NAFTA during the Democratic Debates?

Skip to 4:04

"Nafta did not do what many had hoped"



delrem

(9,688 posts)
12. Nope!
Thu Apr 9, 2015, 10:47 PM
Apr 2015

Nope nope nope!

Nothing counts except what politicians *say* that counts, when campaigning for votes!

People have no memory and that's a good thing.
In fact, I've forgotten those vids already.
I've forgotten the wars already.

Next question??


 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
36. I remember how Hillary Clinton voted in the Senate on the Central American Free Trade Agreement.
Sat Apr 11, 2015, 03:52 PM
Apr 2015

I assume her critics have forgotten that as they never, ever bring it up and it seems like it should be a key point in examining her views on trade agreements. Short memories in service to narratives.

JI7

(89,260 posts)
18. while she does it wont make much difference in the support she gets
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 01:04 AM
Apr 2015

i don't think there is anyone who thinks she is opposed to free trade

delrem

(9,688 posts)
19. I think everybody supports "free trade".
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 03:48 AM
Apr 2015

But issues become complex in international market places, and "fair trade" enters the picture.

Almost nothing is heard about "fair trade",

and furthermore the whole TPP thing is top secret, so people can't even say that they know. Shut out of the process.

Something is fucked up, about that.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
20. Free trade for whom? What do the Working Class get out of all these 'free trade giveaways' that
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 04:03 AM
Apr 2015

are in this secret deal with Foreign Corporations who will have the ability to make the WORKING CLASS pay them when they sue because our Environmental laws prevent them from dumping their garbage in our rivers and lakes?

I wouldn't mind some of that 'free trade' but there isn't a hope in hell the Working Class will get anything but the BILLS for this abomination of a 'deal with the devil'.

Bad enough our own Corporations are controlling everything here, now we'll have thousands of Foreign Corporations joining them.

She needs to say where she stands on this. And why she's taking so long, is telling in itself.

'Silence means consent'.

antigop

(12,778 posts)
25. she can't say anything because she was a part of it. Warren knows this. That's the beauty of it.
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 08:54 AM
Apr 2015

Warren knows Hillary can't really say anything more on it.

If HRC comes out against it, she ticks off her Wall Street donors.

If HRC says she's in favor of it, she ticks off the unions and a lot of Dems.

Smart woman, that Elizabeth Warren.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
29. Yes, Warren is very smart. And she's RIGHT. Clinton needs to let the public know, since she's
Fri Apr 10, 2015, 03:58 PM
Apr 2015

asking for their support, where she stands on many issues, particularly this one which is a direct attack on the very people she is hoping will support her.

antigop

(12,778 posts)
31. sabrina, I think you missed my point.
Sat Apr 11, 2015, 02:31 PM
Apr 2015

Warren boxed Hillary in.

Warren KNOWS Hillary's part in the TPP as SOS.

Warren KNOWS Hillary can't come out against the TPP because she doesn't want to tick off her Wall Street, corporate donors.

Warren KNOWS Hillary can't come out in favor of the TPP because HRC doesn't want to tick off the unions and lots of Dems.

Warren has boxed her in.

Brilliant, brilliant, move.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
33. I agree, I did get your point, but didn't express myself very well. And yes, Warren has
Sat Apr 11, 2015, 02:49 PM
Apr 2015

boxed her in. But this week, we just learned, Congress is going to vote on fast tracking the TPP.

I am guessing that since so many people are deeply concerned about this 'agreement', Hillary will hedge the question by claiming 'I am waiting to see what is in it' and her supporters will, ARE, already saying that.

Which makes them and her, lose so much credibility, because now we DO know SOME of what is in it, and even WORSE than we thought.

I'm sure her handlers have been working hard to try to find a way NOT to let her alienate the voters and/or Wall St, but it's a very tricky situation which is probably why she has not addressed it yet.

My guess is some kind of mealy mouthed 'I don't know what is in it, I hope to be able to comment on the actual content as soon as I see it'.

That should be followed by handing her a few of the leaked Documents and asking her to comment on that part at least.

No candidate, I don't care who it is, should be allowed to avoid answering such important questions directly and clearly.

IF she supports it, which I know she does, and Warren knows she does, then she should just say so and stop trying to find ways to avoid admitting her support.

antigop

(12,778 posts)
34. ok. I agree with you...I think that if HRC responds at all it will be along the lines of what you
Sat Apr 11, 2015, 03:06 PM
Apr 2015

posted: 'I don't know what is in it, I hope to be able to comment on the actual content as soon as I see it'.

It won't be FOR or AGAINST, as you indicated.

I think you are correct.

HRC needs to be held accountable for her part in negotiating the TPP.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sen. Elizabeth Warren: Hi...