Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSan Francisco Opposes TPP Fast Track in New Resolution
San Francisco Opposes TPP Fast Track in New Resolution
The San Francisco Board of Supervisors has unanimously voted in favor of a resolution today urging the district's congressional representatives to oppose Fast Track legislation for the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) agreement. Supervisor John Avalos put forth the resolution, which expresses concerns about the secret trade agreement's provisions that would impact the free and open Internet, among a host of other threats to the public interest.
This comes at a critical time, as lawmakers introduced a new Fast Track (aka trade promotion authority) bill last week to limit Congress' constitutionally-mandated authority over the White House's trade policies. Fast Track would restrict Congress to a yea-or-nay vote to pass the TPP with limited debate, and it would even prevent them from amending the final contents of the deal.
San Francisco is a city that has long been committed to government transparency, and the utter secrecy of deals like the TPP flies in the face of those values. The Board of Supervisors (which also serves as our city council) passed the Sunshine Ordinance almost 15 years ago to protect openness of the government's workings. "Public officials who attempt to conduct the public's business in secret should be held accountable for their actions," the law reads. And of course, the same must also be true of binding international deals, especially those that threaten to constrain federal and state lawmakers from passing rules in the public interest. The back-room meetings that have led to the TPP's harmful provisions should be seen as particularly offensive to a city that itself upholds transparency in government. .............(more)
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/04/san-francisco-passes-resolution-oppose-fast-track-tpp
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 829 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (27)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
San Francisco Opposes TPP Fast Track in New Resolution (Original Post)
marmar
Apr 2015
OP
San Francisco has a long history of taking stands on issues larger than San Francisco....
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2015
#9
moondust
(19,988 posts)1. Unanimously. n/t
merrily
(45,251 posts)2. Obviously, San Fransisco needs to go under the bus.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)5. er...wouldn't that be "under the cable car"?
merrily
(45,251 posts)6. Oh, so now you want to let San Fransisco set the standard?
Hell, no. Let them go under the bus with everyone else. They're not special.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)7. Can it at least be the Green Tortoise bus? n/t.
merrily
(45,251 posts)8. Same bus as everyone else.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)10. And I supposed the "Magic Bus" is also out of the question? n/t.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)3. k&r
Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)4. A city of haterz !!11!11 /nt
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)9. San Francisco has a long history of taking stands on issues larger than San Francisco....
nt