General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSuddenly, Congress is actually working. Why?
No one could have seen this one coming.
Suddenly, Congress is actually doing things. Making compromises. Passing legislation. Confirming people.
The relevant question to ask here is: Why? After all, the past two Congresses were renowned largely for their historic lack of productivity.
With Republicans reclaiming the Senate majority and widening their majority in the House in the 2014 election, there seemed little likelihood that the period between January 2014 and November 2016 would be markedly different from the four years that had preceded it.
And yet, here we are.
Billy Moore, a longtime Democratic congressional staffer and now a lobbyist, sought to explain the detente in a weekly newsletter he sends to Washington types. He wrote:
Congress continued to build bipartisan momentum in the first week of the April session, clearing the permanent Medicare physician pay reform measure for President Barack Obama's signature, confirming a federal judge and beginning a budget resolution conference that could continue the momentum into the summer. . . . The most important factors these initiatives have in common is a consensus on the role of government and committee leadership that want to work together to get things done. Where an issue lacks consensus on government's role, such as immigration, health care or environmental protection, Washington still appears stymied.
...
For the record, not all Democrats -- or even most -- blame Reid. Democrats generally insist that the reason things have begun to work better is because their side isn't willing to block legislation the same way Republicans did when they served in the Senate minority.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2015/04/21/suddenly-congress-is-actually-working-why/?tid=pm_politics_pop_b
bigtree
(85,996 posts)...not working for her.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Eyeing big work ahead, senators cut deal on Loretta Lynch confirmation
bigtree
(85,996 posts)...and now they're playing catch up. I'm still not convinced they're moving in a direction which is in the public interest. Posturing, maybe, after a wave of criticism. Pathetic.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Republicans finally have electoral incentive to do something other than jut say 'no', to show that 'when Republicans have control, Congress isn't gridlocked'. And Dems aren't willing to play the same country-destroying 'No to everything' game that Repubs did for 6 years.
(Edit: Instead, they're (some of them, enough) willing to play the country-destroying game of voting for godawful Republican legislation.)
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Some tiny number of trolls that MIRT sweeps up will say that. A far larger number of people than 'some people' offer up a more nuanced argument about the specific policies in which the parties join together to offer up crappy, country-destroying policies. That's why I edited that comment to point out that many Dems sign on to policies that favour the 1%ers and hurt the rest of us.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)but even on this board, you often hear the lament that 'they're all the same, so why bother.'
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)Kind of hard to keep running on a record of doing nothing, especially when you believe that you can have it all by controlling all three branches of government.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)appear conciliatory.
'Kind of hard to keep running on a record of doing nothing...'
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Amazing how the Beltway Pundits anxiously wring their hands in nervous glee and Republican faux praise when routine matters are not dealt with by the GOP like petulant children.