Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

still_one

(92,209 posts)
1. I expect she will if she hasn't already. The only reason we might not see it is because the media
Wed Apr 22, 2015, 08:34 AM
Apr 2015

may not cover it

daleanime

(17,796 posts)
3. If it was any other issue, a split between a member of the Democratic Congress....
Wed Apr 22, 2015, 08:41 AM
Apr 2015

and the President would be all over the news, but this issue? Not so much.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
2. I'm interested as well.
Wed Apr 22, 2015, 08:34 AM
Apr 2015

She was wrong, according to the White House administration, about the budget at the end of last year too. Now look at what has happened with campaign contributions

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
5. I suspect you really wouldn't want to hear the sincere response from Sen. Warren.
Wed Apr 22, 2015, 09:41 AM
Apr 2015

You may have to wait until the President's tenure is over to hear it.

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
6. Au contraire, I am very interested in hearing it.
Wed Apr 22, 2015, 09:44 AM
Apr 2015

As I assume you are.

Just because I support Hillary doesn't mean I don't respect Elizabeth Warren. And actually agree with her on issues.

So, as the fighter she is I am very interested to hear what she says next in response to Obama.

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
8. Personally, I'd like to see her not all that discreetly tell the President to f!=$ off in response.
Wed Apr 22, 2015, 10:21 AM
Apr 2015

Due to Sen. Warren's popularity, do you think that might be detrimental to Secretary Clinton's campaign if Secretary Clinton does not "evolve" further on this issue?

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
9. I don't know overall... Personally, I hope it is stopped somehow..
Wed Apr 22, 2015, 10:23 AM
Apr 2015

But Clintons position on it is not a make or break for my vote.

 

think

(11,641 posts)
7. She'll say she was wrong & that the secret TPP deal is awesome & a winner for the American worker.
Wed Apr 22, 2015, 09:52 AM
Apr 2015

That's why the American people can't see it. It a surprise!

MerryBlooms

(11,770 posts)
11. Yes, she did today-
Wed Apr 22, 2015, 12:25 PM
Apr 2015

You can't read this

April 22, 2015 | By Elizabeth Warren



The Administration says I’m wrong – that there’s nothing to worry about. They say the deal is nearly done, and they are making a lot of promises about how the deal will affect workers, the environment, and human rights. Promises – but people like you can’t see the actual deal.

For more than two years now, giant corporations have had an enormous amount of access to see the parts of the deal that might affect them and to give their views as negotiations progressed. But the doors stayed locked for the regular people whose jobs are on the line.

If most of the trade deal is good for the American economy, but there’s a provision hidden in the fine print that could help multinational corporations ship American jobs overseas or allow for watering down of environmental or labor rules, fast track would mean that Congress couldn’t write an amendment to fix it. It’s all or nothing.

Before we sign on to rush through a deal like that – no amendments, no delays, no ability to block a bad bill – the American people should get to see what’s in it.


More-
http://elizabethwarren.com/blog/you-cant-read-this
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Has Elizabeth Warren resp...