General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNot another Bush or Clinton: political dynasties reach for 'regular Joe' status
Not another Bush or Clinton: political dynasties reach for 'regular Joe' statusHillary Clinton, Rand Paul, Jeb Bush the US is overflowing with dynastic ambition. Why are Americans still getting the same names on the ballot?
Dan Roberts * Friday 24 April015 * The Guardian
A short stroll from Walkers Point, where the ancestral estate of the Bush dynasty juts out commandingly into the Atlantic ocean, there is a political campaign slogan in urgent need of fresh clarification.
Barbaras husband for president, joked the original badge from George HW Bushs 1992 campaign still proudly on display in the Bush familys local lobster restaurant in Kennebunkport, Maine.
That is, at least, until someone helpfully scrawled over the word husband and added son instead; updating the joke when George W Bush ran for the White House eight years later.
Within days, it will be time to update it again, to Barbaras other son. Jeb Bush is set to announce against his mothers initial advice that he will be joining the family tradition and seeking the Republican party nomination for president.
The Bush predilection for power is nothing new. Jebs grandfather, Prescott, was a US senator. Great-grandfather George Herbert Walker, developer of the Kennebunkport promontory that still bears his name, also founded a Wall Street bank.
But New England is overflowing with enough dynastic ambition right now to make even scions of the gilded age blush. In nearby New Hampshire, Hillary Clinton has been retracing the steps of her husband in the Democratic primary race.
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/apr/24/bush-clinton-dynasties-political-elite?CMP=ema_565
still_one
(92,216 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Oh wait, now I remember. He was elected in large part because he promised to be the "most transparent" POTUS ever.
Oh the irony.
still_one
(92,216 posts)dynasty. Curious why you didn't include Kennedy in that group, they said the same thing about them, and in all cases it doesn't hold water. The populace decides, and in dynasties people are not given the choice
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Choice? Surely you don't mean that Democrats need a robust Primary Election?
still_one
(92,216 posts)Hillary in the primaries
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)Not 2 Clinton's yet. The Clinton's are NOT a dynasty IMO. They're self made people. George Bush never had to worry about ANYTHING his whole life.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)And we can see how that's worked out.
Isn't that enough Bush/Clinton for you?
BreakfastClub
(765 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)He did have some good points for sure, but just sayin'
BreakfastClub
(765 posts)call them a "dynasty." And you know, all dynasties aren't bad. The Kennedy family is loved by many.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)As others have noted, the Kennedy Clan is well liked & even revered by the FDR Left.
And I agree too, that in this case with Hillary, it's the sorry track record on corporatism, militarism and coddling Wall St. that I have issues with.