Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRemember this old story??
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/04/us/politics/04nafta.html?_r=0<snip>
The denials were sweeping when Senator Barack Obamas campaign mobilized last week to refute a report that a senior official had given back-channel reassurances to Canada soft-pedaling Mr. Obamas tough talk on Nafta.
While campaigning in Ohio, Mr. Obama has harshly criticized the North American Free Trade Agreement, which many Ohioans blame for an exodus of jobs. He agreed last week at a debate with Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton that the United States should consider leaving the pact if it could not be renegotiated.
On Monday, a memorandum surfaced, obtained by The Associated Press, showing that Austan D. Goolsbee, a professor of economics at the University of Chicago who is Mr. Obamas senior economic policy adviser, met officials last month at the Canadian consulate in Chicago.
According to the writer of the memorandum, Joseph De Mora, a political and economic affairs consular officer, Professor Goolsbee assured them that Mr. Obamas protectionist stand on the trail was more reflective of political maneuvering than policy.
....more at link
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 923 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (13)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Remember this old story?? (Original Post)
kentuck
Apr 2015
OP
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)1. Now i do. K&R
Thanks for the reminder.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)2. No. I don't remember that old story.
Thank you for bringing it to my attention.
How many banksters are in jail vs. the cabinet?
DURHAM D
(32,610 posts)3. Yep.
Obama's crew used back channels to tell the Canadians he was "Just Kidding". Then they tried to spin it that it was Hillary who did it and that didn't work out for them.
This was the campaign incident that caused Samantha Power (Goolsbee's colleague) to call Hillary "a monster" which resulted in her being fired from the Obama campaign. Not to worry however as Obama gave her a job on his transition team once he was elected and then sent her to the State Department.
Autumn
(45,107 posts)4. I think most of what he has done is “more reflective of political maneuvering than policy.”
Just my opinion.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)5. Keith Olbermann tells a very different story:
The Canadian Government says it was the Clinton campaign who told them not to worry about NAFTA, not Obama's.
steven benen @ http://www.alternet.org/story/78962/nafta-gate_shocker%3A_did_hillary%27s_camp_lie_and_frame_obama
steven benen @ http://www.alternet.org/story/78962/nafta-gate_shocker%3A_did_hillary%27s_camp_lie_and_frame_obama
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)6. Kind of reminds me of this story
Hillary Clintons Wall Street backers: We get it
NEW YORK Hillary Clinton sounded like a woman on a mission after her long drive into the heartland: Theres something wrong, she told Iowans on Tuesday, when hedge fund managers pay lower taxes than nurses or the truckers I saw on I-80 when I was driving here over the last two days.
But back in Manhattan, the hedge fund managers whove long been part of her political and fundraising networks arent sweating the putdown and arent worrying about their take-home pay just yet.
Its just politics, said one major Democratic donor on Wall Street, explaining that some of Clintons Wall Street supporters doubt she would push hard for closing the carried-interest loophole as president, a policy she promoted when she last ran in 2008.
The question is not going to be whether or not hedge fund managers or CEOs make too much money, said a separate Clinton supporter who manages a hedge fund. The question is, how do you solve the problem of inequality. Nobody takes it like she is going after them personally.
...
But back in Manhattan, the hedge fund managers whove long been part of her political and fundraising networks arent sweating the putdown and arent worrying about their take-home pay just yet.
Its just politics, said one major Democratic donor on Wall Street, explaining that some of Clintons Wall Street supporters doubt she would push hard for closing the carried-interest loophole as president, a policy she promoted when she last ran in 2008.
The question is not going to be whether or not hedge fund managers or CEOs make too much money, said a separate Clinton supporter who manages a hedge fund. The question is, how do you solve the problem of inequality. Nobody takes it like she is going after them personally.
...
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/04/hillary-clintons-wall-street-backers-we-get-it-117017.html