Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Sat May 9, 2015, 05:12 AM May 2015

How The Pacific Rim Arbitration Case Is A Preview Of The Trans-Pacific Partnership

El Salvadorian activists traveled to D.C. this week and protested on March 19th against a lawsuit brought against their government by OceanaGold’s mining company Pacific Rim. The lawsuit aims to recoup over $300 million in potential lost revenue after the company failed to obtain a mining permit. The case is being heard at the World Bank’s International Centre for Settlement of investment Disputes (ICSID). NGOs including Oxfam claim that the lawsuit is an undemocratic attempt to force El Salvador to allow unsafe mining conditions which would hurt water quality.

The lawsuit comes as 11 countries, including the U.S., Japan, Peru, Australia and others consider Trans-Pacifica Partnership free trade agreement. The deal is far-reaching and touches on a lot of issues: net neutrality, healthcare costs, environmental degradation, and labor conditions are just a few of the areas of concern. As we wrote in a March 3rd article, the TPP has come under fire in the U.S. for the provisions on Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS), a type of international corporate arbitration similar to the ICSID.

<snip>

"[Oceana Gold subsidiary] Pacific Rim filed a complaint against El Salvador in 2009. In 2012, the ICSID ruled that the case could proceed under El Salvador’s foreign investment laws—laws which have since been amended to prevent international companies from bypassing Salvadoran courts.

“Officials said that Oceana Gold’s subsidiary, Pacific Rim] failed to meet three key legal requirements for a mining permit: It failed to get government approval for its Environmental Impact Study (EIS); It did not submit a required feasibility study; and it was not even close to meeting the requirement that it held titles to (or permission to mine in) all the land for which it requested a concession.

“[OceanaGold] lobbied for a new mining law that it wrote and that would eliminate regulatory requirements it couldn’t meet. Having failed to push the law through, OceanaGold bypassed El Salvador’s democratically-elected government and initiated international arbitration to pressure El Salvador to pay for lost exploration costs and future profits.”

<snip>

http://www.latintimes.com/el-salvadorian-activists-protest-tpp-lawsuit-how-pacific-rim-arbitration-case-preview-303775

Yes indeed, just trust the President... and corporations and republicans.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How The Pacific Rim Arbitration Case Is A Preview Of The Trans-Pacific Partnership (Original Post) cali May 2015 OP
K&R.... daleanime May 2015 #1
Could this be any more obvious? Speak out against the TPP! Enthusiast May 2015 #2
Good example of a vulture salib May 2015 #3
Mineral Extraction is pure Colonialism Octafish May 2015 #4

salib

(2,116 posts)
3. Good example of a vulture
Sat May 9, 2015, 08:17 AM
May 2015

Whether or not they win, this is exactly what many have warned against. A company that really is not even critically interest in conducting business but is happy to simply position itself to potentially conduct business and then sues for potential profits.

What a racket and all because of "free trade".

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How The Pacific Rim Arbit...