Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJuan Cole: Did Jeb Bush Just Commit a War Crime in Justifying the Iraq War?
http://www.commondreams.org/views/2015/05/13/did-jeb-bush-just-commit-war-crime-justifying-iraq-warIt is true that he doesnt seem to have been very clear-headed in his answer. He blamed the intelligence for what he said was a consensus of himself and Hilary Clinton. But the question was not, would you have trusted intelligence agencies all over again, but rather would you still do it knowing what we know now. He said he would, even now.
We know now (actually we knew then) that there was no connection between Iraq and al-Qaeda or the attacks of September 11, 2001, and that Iraq had no nuclear weapons program.
But even before 9/11, in 1998, Jeb Bush signed the letter of the so-called Project for a new American Century trying to pressure Bill Clinton into an attack on Iraq. The signatories mostly came to power under W. and more or less made a coup.
The problem with his blaming the intelligence is that his brother, George W., actively disregarded or even dictated the intelligence. That is why he sourced the phony allegation that Saddam Hussains Iraq received uranium from the central African country of Niger to British intelligence in his 2002 State of the Union address. The CIA saw the same document and thought it was a forgery, and wouldnt sign off on including it in a State of the Union speech. Moreover, the intelligence was being fixed around the policy, as the British head of MI-6, Sir Richard Dearlove, was disturbed to discover on a visit to Washington in summer of 2002.
As Lord Goldsmith tried to tell then British Prime Minister Tony Blair (who hid Goldstones cautions from his own cabinet), there are only three justifications for war in post-1945 international law. The first is self-defense, but Saddam Hussein had not attacked the United States. In fact, in the 1980s Saddam launched an illegal war of aggression on Iran, using chemical weapons, and the Reagan administration actively helped him pursue that war, as well as running interference for his chemical weapons use at the UN Security Council. So not only had Saddam not attacked the US but he had been a de facto US ally.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 853 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Juan Cole: Did Jeb Bush Just Commit a War Crime in Justifying the Iraq War? (Original Post)
eridani
May 2015
OP
brooklynite
(94,655 posts)1. Hyperbolic and over the top...
Whatever you think about Jeb's idiot comment, he's not a Government official, and when he was he had no involvement in the Iraq War, so the answer is obviously no.
Come to think of it, this is what I expect from Common Dreams...
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)3. War crimes for opinions.
Well I thought I saw it all.
BeyondGeography
(39,377 posts)2. Hey
Can I get a job writing the most OTT shit imaginable too?