Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
Thu May 10, 2012, 03:42 PM May 2012

Ed Gillespie: Romney believes in constitutional marriage equality ban (ending states' rights)

http://thinkprogress.org/election/2012/05/10/481772/romney-adviser-gillespie-constitutional-marriage-ba/

Ed Gillespie, senior adviser to Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign, told Chuck Todd on MSNBC’s Daily Rundown that the campaign would make President Obama’s support for marriage equality an issue this November and that Romney will actively push for a constitutional amendment to take away the right of states to voluntarily extend marriage equality to same-sex couples.




Ed is right: this is a bright line between Mitt Romney and Barack Obama.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ed Gillespie: Romney believes in constitutional marriage equality ban (ending states' rights) (Original Post) Bolo Boffin May 2012 OP
Republicans do not truly belive in states rights. Dawson Leery May 2012 #1
I really like how Gillespie has moved his opposition to the right. Bolo Boffin May 2012 #2
If they get two-thirds of the states to approve their ban on marriage equality...? kentuck May 2012 #3
Generally speaking, they would run the amendment through the Congress first Bolo Boffin May 2012 #4

Dawson Leery

(19,348 posts)
1. Republicans do not truly belive in states rights.
Thu May 10, 2012, 03:55 PM
May 2012

Republicans believe in the rights belong to where ever they hold power.
Example: Republicans are the minority in the US Senate. Since they are the minority, they believe they have the right to abuse the rules and block any legislation which they disagree with.

Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
2. I really like how Gillespie has moved his opposition to the right.
Thu May 10, 2012, 04:10 PM
May 2012

While under George W. Bush, they were only about DOMA - keeping all the nasty marriage equality in some states out of the others. Now they're wanting to "drain the swamp" and end marriage equality everywhere.

Looks like President Obama moved the rock yesterday in more ways than one.

kentuck

(111,097 posts)
3. If they get two-thirds of the states to approve their ban on marriage equality...?
Thu May 10, 2012, 04:12 PM
May 2012

Would they then be able to pass a Constitutional Amendment by a vote in the Senate? How would that work?

Bolo Boffin

(23,796 posts)
4. Generally speaking, they would run the amendment through the Congress first
Thu May 10, 2012, 04:18 PM
May 2012

A super-majority (two-thirds) of both the House and Senate must pass it first, and then two-thirds of the states.

Two-thirds of the state legislatures could agree to call a constitutional convention and then propose as many amendments as they like. Those amendments would have to be approved by an "ultra" super-majority of three-fourths of the states. That, of course, has never been done in the history of the republic.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ed Gillespie: Romney beli...