Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
Fri May 22, 2015, 02:52 PM May 2015

Moderate Democrats Get Leadership’s Ear on 2016 Messaging--(New Dems vs. Progressives)

Moderate Democrats Get Leadership’s Ear on 2016 Messaging
By Emma Dumain

There’s some good news for the moderate House Democrats who believe they’ve been marginalized in discussions on party messaging: Leadership might be starting to listen.

On Thursday morning, New Democrat Coalition Chairman Ron Kind of Wisconsin met privately with Democratic Policy and Communications Committee Chairman Steve Israel of New York, both lawmakers confirmed to CQ Roll Call.

Israel, charged with developing a unified narrative to help the minority pick up House seats next year, wanted to talk to Kind about the substance of the New Democrats’ “American Prosperity Agenda,” 23 policy proposals that centrist Democrats contend are keys to winning again in swing districts.

Israel had some news to share with Kind: DPCC-commissioned polling shows the New Democrats are onto something.

“Fundamentally, what we come down to is this: In order to win, you have to get people to vote for you who haven’t voted for you, and the only way to do that is with a message that resonates across a broad swath of voters,” Israel said. “You can’t keep doing the same thing to the same people. You have to resonate with people who may vote for you or may not vote for you. I think Ron was absolutely correct, tactically and strategically, in how you frame that and deliver that.


“Our research and the New Dems’ research agree on the sense that voters have that the economy is changing quickly and [they] want tools to help them stay ahead, so we’re completely aligned on that,” he said. “Making sure we have an economic agenda that supports growth and prosperity for all. … New Dems have a very substantive, positive, solution-oriented agenda, and our data tells us we need to have the same.”

None of those insights seem particularly contentious — and that might be part of the point. One of the things Israel wants to do as he synthesizes the many voices in the House Democratic Caucus is craft a narrative that can speak to as wide a reach of voters as possible and on which a majority of members can agree.

The New Democrats’ “American Prosperity Agenda” also seeks to frame issues using inviting, non-incendiary language — even as many of the agenda’s pro-business policies, such as an overhaul of the tax code, will be harder to sell in the party than the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal.

The agenda also advocates for certain issues — policies to boost scientific and technological innovation to make the United States competitive in the global economy, for example — be brought to the forefront of the Democratic message.

In an interview with CQ Roll Call Thursday, Kind said New Democrats want to impart to colleagues that “there are various ways of saying the same things in a different tone and a different way and that’s what I think is going to be valuable to a lot of our vulnerable, at-risk members, both for recruitment and in districts where we have to be competitive.”

Still, progressive Democrats — those who want to see the party take more aggressive stands on the environment, women’s rights and minority issues — may balk at seeing leadership leading on the New Democrats.

The Congressional Progressive Caucus, now the largest contingent in the House, has been emboldened recently by the emergence of new leaders such as Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and New York Mayor Bill de Blasio.

Progressives contend the key to winning back the House — and keeping the White House — is being unafraid to advocate for policies that fall clearly on the left of the political spectrum. CPC Co-Chairman Keith Ellison, D-Minn., has urged Democrats to embrace the term “liberal,” arguing it’s a designation that needs no apology.


MORE AT:

http://blogs.rollcall.com/218/moderate-democrats-get-leaderships-ear-2016-messaging/?dcz=

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Moderate Democrats Get Leadership’s Ear on 2016 Messaging--(New Dems vs. Progressives) (Original Post) KoKo May 2015 OP
This sort of thing surprises me kenfrequed May 2015 #1
New Democrats are to Progressives what Decaf is to Coffee. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2015 #2
I think they are deluding themselves. The people are sick and tired of business as usual. Rahm's jwirr May 2015 #3
Can we stop calling them "Moderates," please? They are Conservative Democrats. [n/t] Maedhros May 2015 #4
So True...the article is written as if "Liberal/Progressives" had become KoKo May 2015 #5

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
1. This sort of thing surprises me
Fri May 22, 2015, 03:02 PM
May 2015

I am stunned that the New Democrats and the Third Way sorts still think it is the 1990's where they were riding high. The blue dogs were almost wiped out and the DLC no longer technically exists. When are the "New Democrats" going to concede power to the progressives of the party?

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
3. I think they are deluding themselves. The people are sick and tired of business as usual. Rahm's
Fri May 22, 2015, 03:41 PM
May 2015

way is not going to work anymore. Yes I know he just got reelected. But I think that people have changed since 2004 and is not good for the New Democrats who are preaching old safe bipartisan ideas.

We want change and I do not see anything new about the centralists. Been there once.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Moderate Democrats Get Le...