General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOMG. Some tea party types oppose the TPP. What to do?
And, horrors upon horrors, Rush Limbaugh and Senator Sessions oppose it.
Never mind that the Chamber of Commerce and the vast majority of repukes in the Senate and House support it, including such wonderful reps as Ted Cruz and Darryl Issa. Never mind that Wall Street, banks too big too fail, Hedge Fund managers and caring corporations like Monsanto and Nike and Halliburton support it. Never mind that all the labor unions oppose it, that the vast majority of Congressional dems oppose it, All major environmental organizations and most Public Interest groups oppose it. Public Health groups like Doctors Without Borders oppose it. Liberal economists oppose it. Hell the NAACP opposes it.
Anyone with a scrap of intellectual honesty would recognize that opposition to the TPP largely comes from liberals and support for it comes from the right and corporate interests. Trying to make the argument the other way around is bullshit. It's absurd.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)Wot's It, ennywaze?
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)I'll try continuing to think for myself and holding to my principles. Standing by the Constitution often turns out to be the right thing, even in the face of overwhelming public support for war crimes and crimes against humanity.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)Now I just hope Rush doesn't like Doritos because I would hate to give them up.
onecaliberal
(32,863 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)It is just childish divisive crap.
Marr
(20,317 posts)It's pretty pathetic.
treestar
(82,383 posts)to be against it merely because Republicans were for it. Foolish failure to think for oneself. Now they can see how silly it was.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)just so I'm not on the same side as Limbaugh. Pshaw, who cares if millions lose their jobs and workers in other countries are exploited, just so long as ONE man is never criticized, I'm all for it. Priorities people.
erronis
(15,303 posts)"Senator Issa - Are you in favor of ObamaTrade?"
"Only when this snowball melts in hell."
pampango
(24,692 posts)run by the right and full of quotes from right-wing politicians, if anyone is interested in their take.
http://obamatrade.com/
bbgrunt
(5,281 posts)come out against it basically because of ODS. If he has any gas left in the gasbag he inhales, it will help tear the repukes apart.
Kablooie
(18,634 posts)It has nothing to do with the TPP itself.
Blue State Bandit
(2,122 posts)an old white guy in the White House.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)of the corporatists in both parties.
The progressives and unions are against the TPP and Obama, Clinton and the conservatives favor the TPP.
Response to cali (Original post)
lobodons This message was self-deleted by its author.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Binkie The Clown
(7,911 posts)Guess we should hit the gutters and start slurping.
It is, possible, apparently, for people who disagree vehemently about some things to agree completely on other things. Wonder of wonders. The world is not quite as polarized as cable news would like to have us believe it is.
deutsey
(20,166 posts)However, if I felt Common Core actually improved the education of my children, I'd support it.
The Tea Party would oppose it no matter what because it's "Big Government".
That's a significant difference, imo.
I'm anti-war and oppose the Patriot Act, so does Rand Paul, supposedly.
Doesn't mean I'd vote for him or support the larger platform he advocates.
Just because someone I dislike supports or opposes something doesn't necessarily negate my support or opposition.
I'm kind of baffled by the "Rush-opposes-TPP!" argument. Rush has a brand of opposing anything Obama says he supports. That's what keeps his knuckle-draggers tuning in.
I have my reasons for questioning and opposing TPP and none of them involve what that fathead says.
7962
(11,841 posts)Sometimes i think a lot of people WANT everyone to be polarized
QC
(26,371 posts)K&R
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)questionseverything
(9,656 posts)is a pretty big deal
whereisjustice
(2,941 posts)EEO
(1,620 posts)Obama and Mitch McConnell and John Boehner are all in the same boat.
And if that doesn't scare you I don't know what will.
jmowreader
(50,559 posts)This is how the Teabaggers view Obama's positions...
If Obama likes TPP, it obviously MUST be horrific...even though if a Republican president had proposed the same treaty those same people would be accusing all of us of treason for not being in favor of this.
colsohlibgal
(5,275 posts)Most of their beliefs are seriously bat you know what loony. But on a couple of things we do agree. Runaway defense spending, the out of hand surveillance state, Pot, and now apparently also that the TPP is largely ceding our rights.
I welcome them, all hands on deck. This deal needs to be derailed. Enough has leaked out that you might assume the HRC/Obama can do no wrong crowd might give up the ghost but I highly doubt it.
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)BOTH statistically in terms of who literally does not support it and figuratively that other "99% vs. 1%" issues have been discussed as well.
The French learned from the guillotines of the past that when the PTB try to push issues too hard when pretty much everyone hates them except the elites, that ultimately if they don't give in to real democratic principles in how they rule, these things happen.
annabanana
(52,791 posts)On this one issue, the populist streak that runs through the TP is exactly what we need. I wish we could get them past their social issues... OWS and the TP together would be unstoppable.
7962
(11,841 posts)Other tha that, the TP opposes Obama, so it shouldnt be a stretch for them to oppose the TPP either!
phiddle
(789 posts)The issue of the TPP seems to be not left/right so much as corporatists vs populists in both parties. A similar Tea Party-Left alliance can be found on the Patriot Act/NSA/Domestic Surveillance complex of issues. On the one side, (mostly) liberal Dems such as Mark Udall, Sanders, et al plus the more rabid Tea Partiers like Justin Amash, Mike Lee, etc. On the other, the corporatists in both parties---Obama, McConnell, Boehner, etc.
Instructive is that Tea Partiers and LibDems come to the NSA issue with different concerns---for the libs it's grounded in civil liberties, whereas for the TPers it's more an issue of big (and by definition, intrusive) government. For my own part, I don't care where the votes come from to drastically limit the domestic surveillance, nor why a particular vote is cast; I just want it done.
Similarly, regarding the TPP, the LibDems' concerns are due process, corporatism, protection of the American worker, and harmonizing labor/environmental/currency practices upward. For the TP it's more about one world government and hatred of Obama. I think that we should do everything we can to harvest their votes against the TPP. If this alliance were to succeed in stopping the TPP, it would have some nice spinoffs: reducing McConnell's sway, heightening frictions in the Republican party, weakening Boehner, and strengthening he progressives in the Democratic camp. That sounds like win-win-win-win to me.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)So I was going to switch over to supporting it but then I found out that would put me on the same side as Newt Gingrich.
I decided to watch golf on television instead.
kentuck
(111,103 posts)You need all the help you can get. If the Tea Party and the liberals oppose it, then we should celebrate the one area on which we agree, in my opinion.
hunter
(38,317 posts)I boycott everything, except when I don't.
My mid 'eighties salvage title car has lichen growing on it, I only wash the windows, and the resident spiders simply hunker down whenever I drive, like it's a very windy day.
I'm posting this from a $35 computer and a bunch of junk.
"Economic Productivity" as it is now defined is a direct measure of the damage we do to our earth's natural environment and our human spirit.
90% of all "work" is crap.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturgeon%27s_law