Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Exilednight

(9,359 posts)
Mon May 25, 2015, 08:29 PM May 2015

My thoughts on Bernie for President

For the first time in my 40 plus years of life there is a true liberal running for office.

For the first time in my life we have a chance to do something truly brave.

This is our chance; but are we brave enough to take it?

75 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
My thoughts on Bernie for President (Original Post) Exilednight May 2015 OP
Agreed cantbeserious May 2015 #1
If we can get half of the 60% of non-voters to GET UP AND VOTE, it's as good as won. arcane1 May 2015 #2
The operative word being "if" brooklynite May 2015 #72
I voted for George McGovern. immoderate May 2015 #3
+1 CharlotteVale May 2015 #7
I did too. How'd that work out for us? leftofcool May 2015 #17
No one to McGovern's right would have done any better. Nixon had '72 rigged. Ken Burch May 2015 #28
me too, and bingo! You nailed again Ken. 2banon May 2015 #31
McGovern would have done better had he emphasized his military service. He had a WAY better resume MADem May 2015 #50
That's a good point. n/t. Ken Burch May 2015 #51
I only learned of his heroism in "the final days," as it were. MADem May 2015 #53
Left us at the mercy of over simplification of complex systems. immoderate May 2015 #29
And he was the last true liberal. Paka May 2015 #32
I turned 21 the end of November, 1967. mountain grammy May 2015 #33
You are a month my senior. immoderate May 2015 #38
We will do it by sheer will of force, if we so choose. Like making a free throw, you have to believe NYC_SKP May 2015 #4
John Kerry wasn't a Liberal? onehandle May 2015 #5
Pat Buchanan ran editorials supporting Kerry over Bush. n/t Exilednight May 2015 #9
WOW! You are Actually arguing that John Kerry is not a Liberal!!! onehandle May 2015 #11
lol. hrmjustin May 2015 #13
Here's an honest assesment. Exilednight May 2015 #14
Here's a more honest assessment... onehandle May 2015 #22
The National Journal? Spitfire of ATJ May 2015 #55
Did I fail the liberal purity test with a random link too? onehandle May 2015 #61
No. Bonesers. Spitfire of ATJ May 2015 #64
The National Journal likes to claim whoever is running for the Democratic LondonReign2 May 2015 #74
He refused to run an antiwar campaign on Iraq and Afghanistan. Ken Burch May 2015 #34
He's basically Dick Cheney. onehandle May 2015 #42
Indeed. He was Cheney with hair and "nuance". Ken Burch May 2015 #47
No doubt, people believe abortion rights and affirmative action are trivial and meaningless side iss LanternWaste May 2015 #73
Kerry wasn't even strong on THOSE issues. Ken Burch May 2015 #75
Bernie is to DU in 2016 what Kucinich was in 2004/2008. PeaceNikki May 2015 #6
Yes, and he's also been called the Ron Paul of reddit BrotherIvan May 2015 #10
Different types, though. immoderate May 2015 #12
No doubt. I like Sanders immensely more. PeaceNikki May 2015 #16
Kucinich was anti-war RobertEarl May 2015 #18
That, and Bernie knows enough not to answer stupid questions about UFO's Ken Burch May 2015 #30
Bernie makes me *want* to vote! TheNutcracker May 2015 #8
Thread Winner !!! WillyT May 2015 #15
Me too, that's it! appalachiablue May 2015 #40
Me too. Enthusiast May 2015 #23
Oh I so much relate to that! L0oniX May 2015 #41
Me2 840high May 2015 #63
Bernie is- ruffburr May 2015 #19
Me too! peacebird May 2015 #24
I only speak for me. 99Forever May 2015 #20
Good words for me too. Enthusiast May 2015 #25
Survival against the Reign of Terror is right! appalachiablue May 2015 #43
There are enough reasons to give listening people, those who orpupilofnature57 May 2015 #21
Kicked and recommended a whole bunch! Enthusiast May 2015 #26
Bernie is showing tremendous courage in doing this. woo me with science May 2015 #27
Bravo, well said! appalachiablue May 2015 #44
Can you define "true liberal"? George II May 2015 #35
If you need to ask... 99Forever May 2015 #37
It means ... PosterChild May 2015 #39
A "true liberal" sides with the poor and the powerless senz May 2015 #49
Yes I can. n/t Exilednight May 2015 #66
"Some men see things as they are and say why? RufusTFirefly May 2015 #36
We indeed are. But expect an uphill battle with the establishment. nt silvershadow May 2015 #45
We have a chance to have another FDR with Senator Sanders. TheProgressive May 2015 #46
But I see him more as a Huey Long. YOHABLO May 2015 #48
What exactly is your point... TheProgressive May 2015 #58
Odds are, our chance to support him is from now until the Dem primary senz May 2015 #52
Opinions vary, KMOD May 2015 #54
She is Liberal on the issues all Democrats are liberal on. She is not liberal on sabrina 1 May 2015 #60
I respect your opinion, but it's not backed by facts. Exilednight May 2015 #65
You are not alone. And talking to people who do not vote, what I hear from most of the time is: sabrina 1 May 2015 #56
Nothing gets out the vote like JEB May 2015 #59
Absoultely davidpdx May 2015 #68
This is my experience, too. woo me with science May 2015 #67
It wont be the last. People are getting fed up with Conservatives. Spitfire of ATJ May 2015 #57
Yes we are. 840high May 2015 #62
I am brave enough. LWolf May 2015 #69
I'm supporting him & donating to him - TBF May 2015 #70
Hope so... yuiyoshida May 2015 #71
 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
2. If we can get half of the 60% of non-voters to GET UP AND VOTE, it's as good as won.
Mon May 25, 2015, 08:34 PM
May 2015

And we'll win every time.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
28. No one to McGovern's right would have done any better. Nixon had '72 rigged.
Mon May 25, 2015, 09:36 PM
May 2015

Muskie would have lost 49 states. So would Humphrey. So would Scoop Jackson(and if Scoop had won, we couldn't have told his administration was Democratic anyway, since Scoop didn't disagree with Nixon on anything important at all).

A Democrat running on an antiabortion-fuck the hippies-we could still win in Vietnam platform would have been just as doomed to a landslide defeat as the McGovern-Shriver ticket was-and HRC, teleporting back to run in '72 on her current anti-progressive platform, would also have gone down in flames. CREEP and the "dirty tricks" squad would have made sure of it.

It's been shown over and over again that McGovern's stands on the issues weren't the problem.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
50. McGovern would have done better had he emphasized his military service. He had a WAY better resume
Mon May 25, 2015, 11:12 PM
May 2015

than Nixon did. He, for whatever reason, didn't do that. I think a war hero with dozens of bomber missions, speaking out against war, is a brilliant sell. Most of his supporters, though, were barely aware of his service or his heroism.

http://www.seattlepi.com/local/connelly/article/George-McGovern-Appreciating-a-war-hero-turned-3957900.php

Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John Stennis talked of sending U.S. troops back into Cambodia. McGovern shot back: "I'm tired of old men dreaming up wars for young men to fight. If he wants to use American ground troops in Cambodia, let him lead the charge himself."

McGovern experienced war, under fire over Nazi-occupied Europe in World War II. He earned a Distinguished Flying Cross for crash-landing his damaged Liberator, the Dakota Queen II, on an island in the Adriatic.

He went back to teaching after World War II, flirted with the radical-left Henry Wallace campaign in 1948, then built the Democratic Party in South Dakota. He served two terms in Congress and was President Kennedy's inaugural Food for Peace director in the early 1960s.

McGovern started speaking against the Vietnam involvement in 1963 and opposed the war from the start.

He was to incur the wrath of Washington, D.C., warriors who never went near a battlefield. Ex-House Speaker Newt Gingrich, he of multiple deferments, labeled Bill and Hillary Clinton as "McGoverniks" because they worked for McGovern in 1972. In his 80s, he became a whipping boy for the "neo-cons," right-wing intellectuals who championed the U.S. pre-emptive war in Iraq.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
53. I only learned of his heroism in "the final days," as it were.
Mon May 25, 2015, 11:22 PM
May 2015

And that was because I was highly interested in the political process. I thought it was a plus, and when I told others who were right leaners, they didn't believe me. I do think it might have helped him.

 

immoderate

(20,885 posts)
38. You are a month my senior.
Mon May 25, 2015, 10:12 PM
May 2015

I did vote for HHH, but not happily.

My read on games theory says I always vote.

--imm

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
4. We will do it by sheer will of force, if we so choose. Like making a free throw, you have to believe
Mon May 25, 2015, 08:37 PM
May 2015

Nobody who doesn't think they can make it makes the shot very often.

That just doesn't lead to success.

I KNOW we can do it because Sanders or Warren is so strong, and the opposition very weak and worn.

We will succeed, we will win.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
5. John Kerry wasn't a Liberal?
Mon May 25, 2015, 08:41 PM
May 2015

Really?

Setting all others aside, even Kucinich, even... Nader, please explain how John Kerry wasn't a Liberal.

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
22. Here's a more honest assessment...
Mon May 25, 2015, 09:27 PM
May 2015
According to the National Journal scorecard of key votes, Kerry went from being the ninth-most liberal senator in 2002 to the most liberal in 2003 (i.e. the year leading up to the primary).

So he went from the nearly most liberal to literally the most liberal.

Your standards shame me. Shame me!

http://www.nationaljournal.com/congress/past-years-national-journal-vote-ratings-20130213

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
61. Did I fail the liberal purity test with a random link too?
Mon May 25, 2015, 11:44 PM
May 2015

High standards around here.

John Kerry and are I basically Birchers!

LondonReign2

(5,213 posts)
74. The National Journal likes to claim whoever is running for the Democratic
Tue May 26, 2015, 02:43 PM
May 2015

nomination is suddenly the most liberal person, ever, every time.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
34. He refused to run an antiwar campaign on Iraq and Afghanistan.
Mon May 25, 2015, 09:59 PM
May 2015

He wouldn't even defend his own courageous opposition to our involvement in Vietnam (even though no one who still supported that war thirty-two years later was ever going to vote Democratic again).

He proposed no significant reductions in the Pentagon death budget.

He made no proposals to reform labor law or address poverty or unemployment.

He backed trade globalization with no questions asked.

His"safe, legal and rare" line on reproductive rights accepted the right-wing assumption that women should be shamed for having abortions.

He blocked any and all progressive platform language and barred peace posters at the convention, while keeping protesters miles away in a Bush-style "free speech zone".

He was only "liberal" on a tiny handful of trivial, meaningless side issues, nothing that would actually mattered to anone but a few Beltway elitists.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
47. Indeed. He was Cheney with hair and "nuance".
Mon May 25, 2015, 10:46 PM
May 2015

There was no liberalism in his campaign at all, and nothing would have been different if he'd won.

It's not possible to end a war if you've been elected as the "we can do it better" candidate. There are no positions on war other than hawk or dove, slaughter or not slaughter.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
73. No doubt, people believe abortion rights and affirmative action are trivial and meaningless side iss
Tue May 26, 2015, 02:38 PM
May 2015

"He was only "liberal" on a tiny handful of trivial, meaningless side issues, nothing that would actually mattered to anone (sic) but a few Beltway elitists..."

No doubt, many people believe abortion rights and affirmative action are trivial and meaningless side-issues except to Bletway Elitists. I call those people 'under-educated;' but no doubt, they'll rationalize it as something entirely different. Bless their little hearts...

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
75. Kerry wasn't even strong on THOSE issues.
Tue May 26, 2015, 03:07 PM
May 2015

Kerry bought into the "safe, legal, and RARE" canard on choice...meaning he accepted the idea that women who got abortions should be ashamed of themselves.

And he'd been calling on the party to move away from affirmative action(he gave a commencement address at Harvard in which he basically denounced the idea AND denounced most of the party's progressive wing).

Nice try.

Kerry ran in 2004 a bland centrist. He never proposed anything that challenged Bush's ideas in any meaningful way. You can't be timid on the stump and a hero after getting sworn in. Never happens.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
10. Yes, and he's also been called the Ron Paul of reddit
Mon May 25, 2015, 08:54 PM
May 2015

Put that all together, and disgruntled people might add up.

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
16. No doubt. I like Sanders immensely more.
Mon May 25, 2015, 09:08 PM
May 2015

I find Sanders far more qualified and trustworthy. I would not be a bit disappointed if he were elected the nominee and would strongly support him in the GE.

My comparison is to the way DU is reacting to his candidacy and the other Democratic candidates.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
18. Kucinich was anti-war
Mon May 25, 2015, 09:14 PM
May 2015

The only true anti-war candidate back then. Now we have another.

Anti-war is a big deal for some of us. Er, most.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
30. That, and Bernie knows enough not to answer stupid questions about UFO's
Mon May 25, 2015, 09:39 PM
May 2015

(not that that was justification for Dennis being forced out in '08, but still).

ruffburr

(1,190 posts)
19. Bernie is-
Mon May 25, 2015, 09:15 PM
May 2015

The only hope for America to get out from under the corporatist/oligarchy that crooked politicians have let America become. I intend to do everything I can to get Sen. Sanders elected to POTUS.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
20. I only speak for me.
Mon May 25, 2015, 09:20 PM
May 2015

I consider supporting and voting for Senator Sanders, not so much a matter of bravery, but more a matter of survival.

We will not make it thru another neoliberal's or neocon's reign of terror. We MUST stop them, now.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
27. Bernie is showing tremendous courage in doing this.
Mon May 25, 2015, 09:36 PM
May 2015

He is taking on the corrupt, secret government and the MIC. He is taking on the oligarchs. He is taking on the deep state that has already demonstrated its willingness to use any means available to eliminate threats to its power.

Voting requires no bravery compared to that. I agree with 99Forever above that we are talking about survival at this point. Democracy itself and the future of humanity are being systematically murdered by these corporate criminals who have taken control of our government. The consequences of their looting and warmongering and replacement of democracy with corporate exploitation are global.

Courage is contagious. Bernie said he'd do this only if he believed that enough of us were ready to take on this fight with him to make it a real force, this political revolution against corruption. We owe this effort to restore democracy to ourselves, we owe it to our children, we owe it to future generations, we owe it to the world.


 

senz

(11,945 posts)
49. A "true liberal" sides with the poor and the powerless
Mon May 25, 2015, 11:06 PM
May 2015

against the rich and powerful.

Bernie is a true liberal.

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
36. "Some men see things as they are and say why?
Mon May 25, 2015, 10:02 PM
May 2015

I dream things that never were and say why not?"

That's Ted Kennedy's paraphrase of brother Bobby's paraphrase of George Bernard Shaw. Be that as it may, it's still an incredibly inspiring quotation.

 

TheProgressive

(1,656 posts)
46. We have a chance to have another FDR with Senator Sanders.
Mon May 25, 2015, 10:45 PM
May 2015

Senator Sanders has the honest potential to be even more than FDR.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
52. Odds are, our chance to support him is from now until the Dem primary
Mon May 25, 2015, 11:14 PM
May 2015

...and even if Hillary beats him, our efforts will not have been wasted. The media, the public, and the powers-that-be need to know that Bernie's goals and values are passionately held by many, many (maybe most?) Americans. This is how we let them know. We must come out in numbers for Bernie.

And if Bernie beats Hillary, then we go ALL OUT to support and defend him, because the powers that be will try to destroy him. (And they are NOT "nice people.&quot

I hate to say it, but this might be our last chance.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
60. She is Liberal on the issues all Democrats are liberal on. She is not liberal on
Mon May 25, 2015, 11:43 PM
May 2015

many other issues.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
56. You are not alone. And talking to people who do not vote, what I hear from most of the time is:
Mon May 25, 2015, 11:28 PM
May 2015

'We are not represented, they don't care about us' meaning politicians.

Now, I can say to them 'there is one candidate you might find interesting, because he DOES care about you'. So far, once they learn about him, they are willing to admit that his record does show that this is someone who actually cares about people.

So this time I am going to be trying to find as many non-voters as I can because already I am seeing comments all over the internet from people who say they had given up on politics, but are now going to register to vote in order to vote for Bernie.

If everyone who supports him can get at least one non-voter to register to vote for him, he will win.

 

JEB

(4,748 posts)
59. Nothing gets out the vote like
Mon May 25, 2015, 11:38 PM
May 2015

having a candidate you want to vote for. Let us seize the day.

LWolf

(46,179 posts)
69. I am brave enough.
Tue May 26, 2015, 08:56 AM
May 2015

I hope there are enough of us out there to help bring foundational change to our country and our lives.

TBF

(32,084 posts)
70. I'm supporting him & donating to him -
Tue May 26, 2015, 02:24 PM
May 2015

all we need is anyone else who is not a billionaire to do the same. There are many more of us than them.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»My thoughts on Bernie for...