Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo...? the whole New York Times is considered a rightwing rag, now ?
Rather than just some contributors?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 680 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So...? the whole New York Times is considered a rightwing rag, now ? (Original Post)
HereSince1628
May 2015
OP
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)1. Context? nt
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)2. That would require opening a meta-discussion, which is banned.
I just want to know if NYT is now considered a source too polluted to cite on DU.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)3. OK.
Isn't that also meta?
Bryant
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)4. No.
Next.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)5. They are when they don't check facts and resources.
Which apparently they have forgotten how to do considering their latest hit pieces on the Clintons.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)6. Well, thanks.
It seems like an overgeneralization, but now I understand where that opinion comes from....