Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
Sun May 31, 2015, 09:50 AM May 2015

Clinton, as FLOTUS, argues for longer prison sentences in 1994. Sanders, as Rep, votes "Yes"

The bill in question is commonly known as the "Assault Weapons Ban".

Sanders actually stuck his neck out a lot, because Vermont is very 2nd-Amendment-friendly. I don't like the AWB (I think it made the 2000 election close enough that Rove could steal it). Sanders voted for the AWB, and its increased prison sentences.

In retrospect, all of us here agree that the mass incarceration of the past 20 years was a cure worse than the disease. That's why both Clinton and Sanders and O'Malley (can I say "both" for three?) are saying we need to reform incarceration and sentencing.

Honestly I have no idea for whom I'm going to vote, but incarceration is a subject I'm glad the party as a whole, Clinton, Sanders, and O'Malley, seems to have evolved on.

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clinton, as FLOTUS, argues for longer prison sentences in 1994. Sanders, as Rep, votes "Yes" (Original Post) Recursion May 2015 OP
Nothing? Nobody wants to defend this now? (nt) Recursion May 2015 #1
What is there to defend? Wilms May 2015 #2
That bill included longer sentences for petty crime Recursion May 2015 #3
What petty crimes? Please be specific. Wilms May 2015 #8
"Petty" was not my word, but yours. I just ran with it. Recursion May 2015 #9
Oh. OK. Wilms May 2015 #10
There's a very popular OP right now attacking Clinton for supporting that same bill Recursion May 2015 #11
Then drop it. Wilms May 2015 #13
The 90s seem to have been an era when treestar May 2015 #4
True. The murder rate was like 4 times what it is now Recursion May 2015 #5
This is a great response. Raine1967 May 2015 #12
Taking issues from one era and placing them in another is always fraught with problems. DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #6
I agree. I'm glad that Clinton, Sanders, and O'Malley all seem to have "evolved" on this Recursion May 2015 #7
 

Wilms

(26,795 posts)
2. What is there to defend?
Sun May 31, 2015, 11:32 AM
May 2015

You are misleading with the subject line. You seem to want to get me to think Sanders voted for longer sentences for petty crime when all he did was go along with an assault weapons ban...is that right?

Your bias is obvious. And you are, of course, entitled to it. But you're not being straight.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
3. That bill included longer sentences for petty crime
Sun May 31, 2015, 11:33 AM
May 2015

Sanders voted for it. Clinton advocated for it as first lady. O'Malley enforced it as mayor and governor.

All three of them seem to have evolved their views since that time, which is a good thing.

 

Wilms

(26,795 posts)
8. What petty crimes? Please be specific.
Sun May 31, 2015, 12:03 PM
May 2015

I scanned over the 300 some odd page bill. I didn't notice petty crimes. Violence against women is not petty. What did I miss?

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
9. "Petty" was not my word, but yours. I just ran with it.
Sun May 31, 2015, 12:05 PM
May 2015

I wasn't sure why you went to "petty", but I just let you have that. If you don't find the offenses outlined in the 1994 crime bill "petty", I largely agree, so we don't need to argue about it. But those were your words.

 

Wilms

(26,795 posts)
10. Oh. OK.
Sun May 31, 2015, 12:10 PM
May 2015

So he voted to throw people in jail for a long time if they beat up a woman.

And the issue with that is... ?

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
11. There's a very popular OP right now attacking Clinton for supporting that same bill
Sun May 31, 2015, 12:12 PM
May 2015
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6750883

There we go.

This is the bill she was promoting in that quote.

Sanders voted for it.

Clinton advocated for it.

O'Malley enforced it.

All three of them seem to have changed their minds about it since then.
 

Wilms

(26,795 posts)
13. Then drop it.
Sun May 31, 2015, 12:42 PM
May 2015

You're getting noticed.

Unless you have a video of Bernie advocating along with FLOTUS...whyever FLOTUS needed to weigh-in.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
4. The 90s seem to have been an era when
Sun May 31, 2015, 11:39 AM
May 2015

America was nuts about crime. Totally afraid of it and sure it was everywhere. The many laws passed to make things more difficult on criminals show that.

The economy was good enough that everyone had the time to worry about this. And it was before terrorism became a big thing, in spite of OKC and the WTC attacks.

They were both voting as their constituents wanted.

Raine1967

(11,589 posts)
12. This is a great response.
Sun May 31, 2015, 12:19 PM
May 2015

It is very good, and very important that all three candidates seem to have changed their minds about crime. I don;t know if anyone really was a aware of how big and terrible the prison industrial complex would become.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,711 posts)
6. Taking issues from one era and placing them in another is always fraught with problems.
Sun May 31, 2015, 11:43 AM
May 2015

As to law and order the goal should be to find a sweet spot where good people are protected, bad people are punished according to the effect their crimes have on others, and the rights of innocent folks don't get trampled in the process.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
7. I agree. I'm glad that Clinton, Sanders, and O'Malley all seem to have "evolved" on this
Sun May 31, 2015, 11:57 AM
May 2015

and now share our position, compared to their positions in the 1990s.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Clinton, as FLOTUS, argue...