General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsClinton, as FLOTUS, argues for longer prison sentences in 1994. Sanders, as Rep, votes "Yes"
The bill in question is commonly known as the "Assault Weapons Ban".
Sanders actually stuck his neck out a lot, because Vermont is very 2nd-Amendment-friendly. I don't like the AWB (I think it made the 2000 election close enough that Rove could steal it). Sanders voted for the AWB, and its increased prison sentences.
In retrospect, all of us here agree that the mass incarceration of the past 20 years was a cure worse than the disease. That's why both Clinton and Sanders and O'Malley (can I say "both" for three?) are saying we need to reform incarceration and sentencing.
Honestly I have no idea for whom I'm going to vote, but incarceration is a subject I'm glad the party as a whole, Clinton, Sanders, and O'Malley, seems to have evolved on.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Wilms
(26,795 posts)You are misleading with the subject line. You seem to want to get me to think Sanders voted for longer sentences for petty crime when all he did was go along with an assault weapons ban...is that right?
Your bias is obvious. And you are, of course, entitled to it. But you're not being straight.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Sanders voted for it. Clinton advocated for it as first lady. O'Malley enforced it as mayor and governor.
All three of them seem to have evolved their views since that time, which is a good thing.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)I scanned over the 300 some odd page bill. I didn't notice petty crimes. Violence against women is not petty. What did I miss?
Recursion
(56,582 posts)I wasn't sure why you went to "petty", but I just let you have that. If you don't find the offenses outlined in the 1994 crime bill "petty", I largely agree, so we don't need to argue about it. But those were your words.
So he voted to throw people in jail for a long time if they beat up a woman.
And the issue with that is... ?
Recursion
(56,582 posts)There we go.
This is the bill she was promoting in that quote.
Sanders voted for it.
Clinton advocated for it.
O'Malley enforced it.
All three of them seem to have changed their minds about it since then.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)You're getting noticed.
Unless you have a video of Bernie advocating along with FLOTUS...whyever FLOTUS needed to weigh-in.
treestar
(82,383 posts)America was nuts about crime. Totally afraid of it and sure it was everywhere. The many laws passed to make things more difficult on criminals show that.
The economy was good enough that everyone had the time to worry about this. And it was before terrorism became a big thing, in spite of OKC and the WTC attacks.
They were both voting as their constituents wanted.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Politicians gotta politicize
Raine1967
(11,589 posts)It is very good, and very important that all three candidates seem to have changed their minds about crime. I don;t know if anyone really was a aware of how big and terrible the prison industrial complex would become.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)As to law and order the goal should be to find a sweet spot where good people are protected, bad people are punished according to the effect their crimes have on others, and the rights of innocent folks don't get trampled in the process.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)and now share our position, compared to their positions in the 1990s.