Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI Fooled Millions Into Thinking Chocolate Helps Weight Loss. Here's How.
I Fooled Millions Into Thinking Chocolate Helps Weight Loss. Here's How.
I am Johannes Bohannon, Ph.D. Well, actually my name is John, and Im a journalist. I do have a Ph.D., but its in the molecular biology of bacteria, not humans. The Institute of Diet and Health? Thats nothing more than a website.
Other than those fibs, the study was 100 percent authentic. My colleagues and I recruited actual human subjects in Germany. We ran an actual clinical trial, with subjects randomly assigned to different diet regimes. And the statistically significant benefits of chocolate that we reported are based on the actual data. It was, in fact, a fairly typical study for the field of diet research. Which is to say: It was terrible science. The results are meaningless, and the health claims that the media blasted out to millions of people around the world are utterly unfounded.
Heres how we did it.
The Setup
I got a call in December last year from a German television reporter named Peter Onneken. He and his collaborator Diana Löbl were working on a documentary film about the junk-science diet industry. They wanted me to help demonstrate just how easy it is to turn bad science into the big headlines behind diet fads. And Onneken wanted to do it gonzo style: Reveal the corruption of the diet research-media complex by taking part.
...snip...http://io9.com/i-fooled-millions-into-thinking-chocolate-helps-weight-1707251800
The Hook
I know what youre thinking. The study did show accelerated weight loss in the chocolate groupshouldnt we trust it? Isnt that how science works?
Heres a dirty little science secret: If you measure a large number of things about a small number of people, you are almost guaranteed to get a statistically significant result. Our study included 18 different measurementsweight, cholesterol, sodium, blood protein levels, sleep quality, well-being, etc.from 15 people. ... We didnt know exactly what would pan outthe headline could have been that chocolate improves sleep or lowers blood pressurebut we knew our chances of getting at least one statistically significant result were pretty good.
Lots more here: http://io9.com/i-fooled-millions-into-thinking-chocolate-helps-weight-1707251800
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1476 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I Fooled Millions Into Thinking Chocolate Helps Weight Loss. Here's How. (Original Post)
progressoid
May 2015
OP
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)1. Good thing I ate my dark chocolate peanut butter cups before I read this.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)2. "Let’s see how far we can take this"
Could we get something published? Probably. But beyond that? I thought it was sure to fizzle. We science journalists like to think of ourselves as more clever than the average hack. After all, we have to understand arcane scientific research well enough to explain it. And for reporters who dont have science chops, as soon as they tapped outside sources for their storiesreally anyone with a science degree, let alone an actual nutrition scientistthey would discover that the study was laughably flimsy. Not to mention that a Google search yielded no trace of Johannes Bohannon or his alleged institute. Reporters on the health science beat were going to smell this a mile away. But I didnt want to sound pessimistic. Lets see how far we can take this, I said.
...
It was time to share our scientific breakthrough with the world. We needed to get our study published pronto, but since it was such bad science, we needed to skip peer review altogether. Conveniently, there are lists of fake journal publishers. (This is my list, and heres another.) Since time was tight, I simultaneously submitted our paperChocolate with high cocoa content as a weight-loss acceleratorto 20 journals. Then we crossed our fingers and waited.
Our paper was accepted for publication by multiple journals within 24 hours. Needless to say, we faced no peer review at all. The eager suitor we ultimately chose was the the International Archives of Medicine. It used to be run by the giant publisher BioMedCentral, but recently changed hands. The new publishers CEO, Carlos Vasquez, emailed Johannes to let him know that we had produced an outstanding manuscript, and that for just 600 Euros it could be accepted directly in our premier journal.
Although the Archives editor claims that all articles submitted to the journal are reviewed in a rigorous way, our paper was published less than 2 weeks after Onnekens credit card was charged. Not a single word was changed.
...
It was time to share our scientific breakthrough with the world. We needed to get our study published pronto, but since it was such bad science, we needed to skip peer review altogether. Conveniently, there are lists of fake journal publishers. (This is my list, and heres another.) Since time was tight, I simultaneously submitted our paperChocolate with high cocoa content as a weight-loss acceleratorto 20 journals. Then we crossed our fingers and waited.
Our paper was accepted for publication by multiple journals within 24 hours. Needless to say, we faced no peer review at all. The eager suitor we ultimately chose was the the International Archives of Medicine. It used to be run by the giant publisher BioMedCentral, but recently changed hands. The new publishers CEO, Carlos Vasquez, emailed Johannes to let him know that we had produced an outstanding manuscript, and that for just 600 Euros it could be accepted directly in our premier journal.
Although the Archives editor claims that all articles submitted to the journal are reviewed in a rigorous way, our paper was published less than 2 weeks after Onnekens credit card was charged. Not a single word was changed.
No one ever went broke underestimating Barnum's children.
progressoid
(49,998 posts)4. CBS and NPR ran a story about this fake.
But I wonder how many of the news outlets that originally touted this story ran a correction. Not many I would guess.
malaise
(269,157 posts)3. It wouldn't matter to me
I never ever go to bed at night without eating a piece of chocolate. And the first thing we do in the morning is drink coffee.