Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Tue Jun 2, 2015, 08:43 AM Jun 2015

The ridiculous non-candidate charade

t might look like a duck and quack like a duck. But until it formally announces that it is a duck, don’t even think about calling it a duck, let alone holding it to any duck-related rules and regulations.

Such is the ridiculous state of our presidential non-campaign campaigns.

Take, for instance, Jeb Bush’s non-candidacy candidacy. Bush hasn’t held public office in more than eight years, but for some mysterious reason he recently hired a team of public policy advisers. He has delivered speeches and met with voters in key early primary and caucus states such as New Hampshire, Iowa and Nevada. He’s given interviews about everything from Social Security to gay marriage to National Security Agency surveillance. He has also reportedly raised something like $100 million for Right to Rise, the super PAC he founded.

Right to Rise is expected to politic in support of a to-be-determined presidential candidate whose name is widely rumored to rhyme with Shmeb Shmush. But alas, even as the money spigot gushes, no such candidate has materialized. Apparently Silicon Valley isn’t the only place where you can raise millions of dollars without actually having a product.

Right to Rise has no candidate to promote because Bush maintains that he can’t decide whether he wants to become the next Decider. Honest to goodness!

more
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-hypothetical-un-candidates-for-president/2015/06/01/da06bd58-0892-11e5-a7ad-b430fc1d3f5c_story.html

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The ridiculous non-candidate charade (Original Post) n2doc Jun 2015 OP
The Supreme Court decided Citizens United in 2010, so you know what that means? gratuitous Jun 2015 #1
scummy scotty is the same dembotoz Jun 2015 #2
Too dumb to fail. GeorgeGist Jun 2015 #3
Other reasons for charading fadedrose Jun 2015 #4

fadedrose

(10,044 posts)
4. Other reasons for charading
Tue Jun 2, 2015, 10:18 AM
Jun 2015

Writing books, wanting to run in next election, wanting name recognition, wanting to be named Sec. of State, etc.

They mainly want name recognition so they can jump in if there's a hitch somewhere and another sex offender is knocked out of the race...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The ridiculous non-candid...