General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPlease DU this poll: Should Virginia governor phase out the Confederate flag from license plates
Poll: Do you agree with Governor Terry McAuliffe's plan to phase out the Confederate battle flag from Virginia-issued license plates?
[link:http://www.richmond.com/news/national-world/government-politics/poll_717ead14-19b2-11e5-923e-533c9d167bd4.html|
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)They are going to send new license plates to the approx 1,800 plate holders
Gothmog
(145,340 posts)HassleCat
(6,409 posts)The license plate is an individual statement, not an official endorsement. Virginia allows all sorts of special plates, including a "Parrothead" design for Jimmy Buffett fans. If people want to roll down the highway with a license plate that says, "Hi y'all! I'm an ignorant bigot!" that's their right under the 1st Amendment.
FSogol
(45,491 posts)No need for the state to lend legitimacy to crappy causes. The Supreme Court recently agreed.
JustinL
(722 posts)Held: Texass specialty license plate designs constitute government speech, and thus Texas was entitled to refuse to issue plates featuring SCVs proposed design. Pp. 518.
...
This final approval authority allows Texas to choose how to present itself and its constituency. Thus, Texas offers plates celebrating the many educational institutions attended by its citizens. See Tex. Transp. Code Ann. §504.615. But it need not issue plates deriding schooling. Texas offers plates that pay tribute to the Texas citrus industry. See §504.626. But it need not issue plates praising Floridas oranges as far better. And Texas offers plates that say Fight Terrorism. See §504.647. But it need not issue plates promoting al Qaeda.
If someone wants to display a Confederate flag or a pro-al Qaeda statement on their vehicle, they can get a bumper sticker.
I think all states should discontinue everything but vanity plates, where it's clear no state endorsement or support is implied. In the case of Virginia, they have about a million different designs, but they're still in the business of deciding what is "worthy" and what is not. As long as they do that, the design represents an official endorsement, so they need to quit doing that. It's too bad, since some perfectly good things would be thrown out along with the rebel flag.
JustinL
(722 posts)For example, the state can certainly endorse constitutional democracy over dictatorship, or tolerance over bigotry. From the Supreme Court's decision in the Texas case:
We have therefore refused (t)o hold that the Government unconstitutionally discriminates on the basis of viewpoint when it chooses to fund a program dedicated to advance certain permissible goals, because the program in advancing those goals necessarily discourages alternative goals. Rust v. Sullivan, 500 U. S. 173, 194 (1991). We have pointed out that a contrary holding would render numerous Government programs constitutionally suspect. Ibid. Cf. Keller v. State Bar of Cal., 496 U. S. 1, 12 13 (1990) (If every citizen were to have a right to insist that no one paid by public funds express a view with which he disagreed, debate over issues of great concern to the public would be limited to those in the private sector, and the process of government as we know it radically transformed). And we have made clear that the government can speak for itself. Southworth, supra, at 229.
That is not to say that a governments ability to express itself is without restriction. Constitutional and statutory provisions outside of the Free Speech Clause may limit government speech. Summum, supra, at 468. And the Free Speech Clause itself may constrain the governments speech if, for example, the government seeks to compel private persons to convey the governments speech. But, as a general matter, when the government speaks it is entitled to promote a program, to espouse a policy, or to take a position. In doing so, it represents its citizens and it carries out its duties on their behalf.
herding cats
(19,565 posts)choie
(4,111 posts)to the poll? Jeezus Christ it's not 2015, it's 1815
femmocrat
(28,394 posts)Done.