Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMaybe a tinfoil hat theory. BUT if that TPP part about privitized sections being stuck privatitzed.
Remember a few years back some counties privatized their fire department?
Some counties and towns have talked about privatizing police departments/sheriff departments because taxes aren't able to pay for these services.
IF this part of the TPP is true and says once you privatize a public service you can't change it back to a public service you would basically have a legal thug gang that could be worse than the police abuse issues now.
Imagine your city privatizing your police department and now instead of Taxes you have to pay a monthly service charge. Imagine if that service charge is broken into our regular service, our gold service ( for a little more money) and Platium service (more money) now imagine you have regular service and your neighbor who has a grudge against you has the best service and decides you are making too much noise or doesn't like you are having a birthday party in your back yard and they basically call this privatize police department. ....
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1054 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Maybe a tinfoil hat theory. BUT if that TPP part about privitized sections being stuck privatitzed. (Original Post)
diabeticman
Jun 2015
OP
OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)1. Bechtel's coming for our water. nt
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)2. So now the TPP is going to cause cities to privatize police, fire departments, etc.
Last edited Thu Jun 25, 2015, 01:57 AM - Edit history (1)
Nor does it say you can't change it back. I suppose if some yahoo town turned the police department over to a Somalian security company, and then got tired of Sharia law, and booted them out. The Somalian company might he entitled to some damages if they had a long term contract. But who the heck thinks that is going to happen?
starroute
(12,977 posts)3. It's TISA that does this, not the TPP, but it's totally real
http://teamster.org/magazine/2015/winter/tisa-newest-bad-trade-deal
Many states and municipalities burned by high costs and poor performance of private service providers are bringing those services back under the governments control. Last year, Maryland passed a law banning private contractors from contracting with the state if they broke the law.
In Oregon, Nebraska and Connecticut, legislatures passed laws requiring more supervision of private contracts. Nineteen states had legislation introduced that would let taxpayers reclaim control of public services.
But TISA negotiators have a trick up their sleeves. The TISA would limit and possibly ban the return of privatized services to governments. According to PSI, TISA would prevent governments from creating or reestablishing public monopolies or similar uncompetitive forms of service delivery.
It would also lock in any privatization of government services. PSI explains that if a government did decide to privatize a public service, that government would be unable to return to a public model at a later date.
Many states and municipalities burned by high costs and poor performance of private service providers are bringing those services back under the governments control. Last year, Maryland passed a law banning private contractors from contracting with the state if they broke the law.
In Oregon, Nebraska and Connecticut, legislatures passed laws requiring more supervision of private contracts. Nineteen states had legislation introduced that would let taxpayers reclaim control of public services.
But TISA negotiators have a trick up their sleeves. The TISA would limit and possibly ban the return of privatized services to governments. According to PSI, TISA would prevent governments from creating or reestablishing public monopolies or similar uncompetitive forms of service delivery.
It would also lock in any privatization of government services. PSI explains that if a government did decide to privatize a public service, that government would be unable to return to a public model at a later date.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)4. Sorry, sounds like fear mongering to me. No agreement is going to do that.
tridim
(45,358 posts)5. Yay. More insane FUD! nt