General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA Lot of My Gay Friends Think SCOTUS Decision Was Bad
Made you look but a GOP senator did say this
guess who?
I'll wait while the ice caps all melt and this snowball
OK....... clue over
GOP Sen. Inhofe: A Lot of My Gay Friends Think SCOTUS Decision Was Bad
In reaction to the Supreme Court decision legalizing same-sex marriages across all 50 states, Sen. James Inhofe (R-OK) pulled the some of my friends are gay card, but not in the way youd normally expect.
Ive been disappointed, and I was not surprised. I thought they would rule the way they did, Inhofe told Tulsas CBS-affiliated KOTV. I know a lot of people, actually a lot of people who are friends of mine in the gay community, who also think it was a bad decision, he added in the clip first spotted by BuzzFeed News reporter Andrew Kaczynski
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/gop-sen-inhofe-a-lot-of-my-gay-friends-think-scotus-decision-was-bad/
?crop=0.9766081871345029xw:1xh;0.011695906432748537xw,0xh&resize=700 &output-format=image/jpeg&output-quality=75
MADem
(135,425 posts).... a snowball's chance in hell!!!
3catwoman3
(24,006 posts)...to it.
Inhofe is an "in"-becile.
A Simple Game
(9,214 posts)That man doesn't have friends, he has people he uses and people that use him, but no friends.
Cha
(297,275 posts)gollygee
(22,336 posts)as saying "a lot of women I know think . . ." and having those women be Ann Coulter and Michelle Malkin.
Volaris
(10,271 posts)I know, I know, I'm not supposed to do that to Lindsey, I said I would stop.
But it's such low-hanging fruit that it
dammit I did it again!!!
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)Hayduke Bomgarte
(1,965 posts)Yeah, what you said, plus I question him knowing what the word "friends" means.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)to staying in the closet.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Inhofe is yet another of Yesterday's Men inhabiting the failed GOP.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)tanyev
(42,564 posts)spanone
(135,843 posts)Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)[img][/img]
ctsnowman
(1,903 posts)Quackers
(2,256 posts)On an unrelated note, one couple I'm friends with are absolutely ecstatic and can't wait to get married, but another couple I'm friends with just split after the SCOTUS ruling. It turns out one wanted more than anything to be married and the other just played along with the idea. Now that it's possible, he told him no. My friend who wanted to get married now feels his ex was using the law as an excuse. Anyways, I hope he finds someone who can appreciate him and respect him enough to be honest and open. I know it had to be horrible waiting for this ruling with so much anticipation and excitement, then to have your world crushed by the one you love the same day.
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)But I'm sorry he's in pain. Marriage isn't for everyone, straight or gay.
I just feel so bad for him. A day that should have been filled with nothing but happiness and celebration is now marred for him.
Response to Quackers (Reply #13)
Ilsa This message was self-deleted by its author.
IronLionZion
(45,447 posts)There are plenty of straight people who don't like marriage, but that's no reason to outlaw straight marriage. Don't like it, don't have one.
Indydem
(2,642 posts)In another 10 years, this would have happened on its own. There are already more millennials than baby boomers, and they are more open to freedom.
But, by this ruling "forcing" this on everyone it's going to whip up anti-gay sentiment and make some people less likely to accept the idea.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)The subject of "judicial restraint" represents a long-standing debate in American jurisprudence. Justices of the Supreme Court have differed in how willing they are to overturn democratically enacted legislation on Constitutional grounds. There are probably at least some LGBT people who welcome the practical effects of the decision but who believe, as a matter of legal principle, that the Fourteenth Amendment did not enact same-sex marriage.
Of course, such a principled believer in judicial restraint would apply it across the board. The Obergefell dissenters, by contrast, are the same Justices who merrily overturned democratically enacted legislation about voting rights, campaign finance, gun control, affirmative action, etc. There's a good post about a well-known law professor pointing out their hypocrisy here.
As for Inhofe, I'm sure he does have some friends -- but I join in the general skepticism about his assertion that he has openly gay friends, let alone any who deplore the ruling.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)And he has done more good than any other president- Military gays, immigrant gays, and Americans... no need to wait 10 years more for something that is hundreds of years overdue in America.
TBF
(32,062 posts)That should be tatooed on many right-winger heads. Seriously, the party of "government shouldn't intrude" sure gets in a frenzy when people aren't doing what THEY want them to do. What a bunch of hypocrites.
rurallib
(62,420 posts)That would be Lyndsey.
Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)40RatRod
(532 posts)marble falls
(57,099 posts)Omaha Steve
(99,655 posts)Is that conservative speak for I'm gay? His parents having kids was a bad idea too.
Sorry for offending anyone in advance.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)madville
(7,410 posts)There probably are some that had found it convenient to say to a partner "I'd love to marry you but the law just won't allow it". Now they're probably like "uh-oh".
That's the only scenario I could imagine where someone the ruling applies to would not be excited about it, due to their personal relationship situation.
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)Are those promising to marry their lovers "when its a legal" when they don't really mean it.
Probably some breakups going on right now.
He's a shit.
madamesilverspurs
(15,805 posts)is probably equal to the number of his friends who are climate scientists.
Thespian2
(2,741 posts)Very clever post, thanks...
I still have trouble understanding why anyone with a working brain cell would believe a word that comes from the mouth of James Inhofe...for years, he has proven that he doesn't give a shit about people other than the Filthy Rich who keep the cash flowing into his accounts...
A gay friend? Perhaps one of his owners?
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)suilebhan
(12 posts)I knew Inhofe was losing it when he threw a snowball in the Senate chambers. Now there's more proof: he admits to having imaginary friends.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)at least GOP Sen. Inhofe uses the word 'gay', instead of the, republican-conservative 1950s word, homosexual.
Gothmog
(145,291 posts)His gay friends are imaginary just like the scientists who support his claims on global climate change
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)translates as "some gay guy I met more than once through friends of mine who for some reason have relations with homosexuals".
How did Inhofe even have a phone number of that guy, to ask for his opinion?
SwankyXomb
(2,030 posts)or just "temporary employees"?
Skittles
(153,164 posts)redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Think Larry Craig, Lindsey Graham
Solly Mack
(90,769 posts)Initech
(100,079 posts)catrose
(5,068 posts)Figures.
I missed the one where he put all those friends on camera so that they could speak for themselves.
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)joeybee12
(56,177 posts)yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)I am guessing that no gay person will confirm the friendship.