Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MADem

(135,425 posts)
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 08:07 AM Jun 2015

Washington National Cathedral's Dean Wants to Remove Stained Glass Windows Showing Confederate Flag

http://abcnews.go.com/US/washington-national-cathedrals-dean-remove-stained-glass-windows/story?id=32072532


Each window has an engraved inscription, Eckstrom said -- the inscription on Lee's window describes Lee as a man "without fear and without reproach."

"We're not so sure that in 2015 we can say that Robert E. Lee and the cause that he fought for was without reproach," Eckstrom said.

"Stained glass windows exist to tell a story," Eckstrom said. They are "intended to let the light of God into the assembled worshipers. And right now, with these windows, that light is being filtered through a symbol that we all know is associated with racial supremacy, violence and racism. And the dean doesn't feel like at this point ... that those windows should continue to be a part of the Cathedral's life."





9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

MADem

(135,425 posts)
2. The whole article is instructive. The "reproach" comment, particularly.
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 08:43 AM
Jun 2015

They could probably design a more appropriate window to commemorate that period in our history.

"There's a difference between observing history and celebrating it," Eckstrom added. "And the dean does not feel this is a part of our history that's worth celebrating."

According to the dean's statement, a group will meet to discuss the future of the Jackson and Lee windows. For now, the Cathedral will put up a display next to the windows to explain their historical context.

The dean also plans to address the windows in his sermon Sunday.

Spazito

(50,339 posts)
5. I really like that they are going to explain the historical context...
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 09:32 AM
Jun 2015

of the racist flag and it's sordid history, a teachable moment, while they decide what to do about it.

Nay

(12,051 posts)
3. I don't think that artifacts like this need to be removed because of the
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 09:05 AM
Jun 2015

flag; it's a fair representation of the Civil War and doesn't do anything but depict the actual history of the country. A Confederate flag flying on government property sends a racist message, but this sort of stuff does no such thing.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
4. I think some kind of "reproach" is in order, though. Lee was a traitor.
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 09:16 AM
Jun 2015

I see nothing wrong with a Civil War window, I just think we might do better at creating one that doesn't lionize the guy that was a traitor and tried to break the country apart...or lionize his lousy flag of hate, either.

They'll talk it out, and figure it out, I'm sure.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,340 posts)
6. Do we need a "National Cathedral"?
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 02:03 PM
Jun 2015

We don't have a "National Religion", right?

Anyway, thanks to General Lee for providing us with that nice National Cemetery at Arlington.

 

Arugula Latte

(50,566 posts)
7. Yeah, I always thought that was weird.
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 02:06 PM
Jun 2015

Let's propose a "National Mosque" and see how that goes over.

Also, I'd like to see a "National Olive Garden" so those of us who are Pastafarians will have a place to come together and worship. And be family. And eat unlimited breadsticks in fellowship.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Washington National Cathe...