Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sunday's Doonesbury-Sacrifices (Original Post) n2doc Jun 2015 OP
The best way to look after your brother soldiers is to keep them out of wars. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2015 #1
And the congregation says "Amen!" Ilsa Jun 2015 #2
Soldiers may have to follow orders, but citizens have a duty to question on point Jun 2015 #4
This is exactly how warmongers get their wars fought ... eppur_se_muova Jun 2015 #3
Very powerful cartoon Gothmog Jun 2015 #5
And Doonesbury gets it. tazkcmo Jun 2015 #6

on point

(2,506 posts)
4. Soldiers may have to follow orders, but citizens have a duty to question
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 10:20 AM
Jun 2015

In order to protect those soldiers

eppur_se_muova

(36,263 posts)
3. This is exactly how warmongers get their wars fought ...
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 09:58 AM
Jun 2015

throw trained soldiers into harm's way, and leave them to defend their buddies. If they have to kill some of the "enemy" (together with some collateral damage) in the process, so be it. It's the most viciously inhumane exploitation imaginable.

Years ago, I read a book about the French in Vietnam, before the Americans got involved. Soldiers there told the same story. They were sent out on patrols which made no sense, and sent directly into areas where the VC had all the advantages. They took enormous casualties, as the VC could pick them off a few at a time and disappear into the jungle. But they kept fighting because they were "protecting their buddies". And they went back out on the next patrol because soldiers follow orders.

It had nothing to do with politics, like BD said. But it got the war on.

tazkcmo

(7,300 posts)
6. And Doonesbury gets it.
Sun Jun 28, 2015, 12:12 PM
Jun 2015

Veteran my self (1985-1990, re-called for Oil War I) and this cartoon hits it on the nail. The military is a small family, you meet new brothers and sisters with every new post and reacquaint with others from previous posts. While our reasons for enlisting are numerous and vary from member to member, once in we look out for each other in peace and in combat.

As an example:

I work with an Oil War II vet (sniper, name of Ron) and we've known each other for about a month. Last night he was asked to come in and help out due to a dishwasher no-showing and he did. When I arrived I went by the dish pit to say hello to both men as I usually do. He left around 9ish while the remainder of us remained to finish the shift and close the restaurant. When I finished my duties I helped the other dishwasher that had shown (Nu, pronounced "new&quot finish up his duties as he was doing a two person job by himself. Nu told me that Ron had not cared for the way Nu had greeted me (we joke and rib each other for being "old&quot and Ron had make very clear to Nu that he did not care for the way Nu had interacted with me. In Nu's words, Ron had "stuck up" for me. Nu had to explain to Ron that he meant no disrespect, that he and I rib each other like this all the time.

As I said, I've known Ron for a month. We don't hang out off work. We are not "friends". We are brothers. We have each other's backs. This is why I'm a proud veteran even while being completely disgusted by our leader's use of our forces. Doonsebury gets it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sunday's Doonesbury-Sacri...