Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums19 Hysterical Passages From Supreme Court Same-Sex Marriage Dissenters
The opinions are rife with criticism for the majority, including claims that they have upended the reputation of the Court, paranoia about the consequences for religious objectors, and a rejection of the idea that the benefits of marriage even constitute a liberty. Heres a look at some of the most hysterical reactions from the dissenting justices.
Roberts: No court should ever care about this issue.
Whether same-sex marriage is a good idea should be of no concern to us. Under the Constitution, judges have power to say what the law is, not what it should be. The people who ratified the Constitution authorized courts to exercise neither force nor will but merely judgment.
Roberts: What about the Aztecs?
As a result, the Court invalidates the marriage laws of more than half the States and orders the transformation of a social institution that has formed the basis of human society for millennia, for the Kalahari Bushmen and the Han Chinese, the Carthaginians and the Aztecs. Just who do we think we are?
Scalia: The majority is trying to overthrow the government, similar to the Nazis in Germany.
But what really astounds is the hubris reflected in todays judicial Putsch. The five Justices who compose todays majority are entirely comfortable concluding that every State violated the Constitution for all of the 135 years between the Fourteenth Amendments ratification and Massachusetts permitting of same-sex marriages in 2003.
Thomas: Gay people are fine without government recognition, just like slaves.
The corollary of that principle is that human dignity cannot be taken away by the government. Slaves did not lose their dignity (any more than they lost their humanity)
because the government allowed them to be enslaved. Those held in internment camps did not lose their dignity because the government confined them. And those denied
governmental benefits certainly do not lose their dignity because the government denies them those benefits. The government cannot bestow dignity, and it cannot take it away.
because the government allowed them to be enslaved. Those held in internment camps did not lose their dignity because the government confined them. And those denied
governmental benefits certainly do not lose their dignity because the government denies them those benefits. The government cannot bestow dignity, and it cannot take it away.
More hilarity here:
http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2015/06/26/3674385/dissent-marriage-equality/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
24 replies, 2169 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
24 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
19 Hysterical Passages From Supreme Court Same-Sex Marriage Dissenters (Original Post)
Surya Gayatri
Jun 2015
OP
They should be ashamed of themselves...is this SUPREME COURT-quality arguing?
Surya Gayatri
Jun 2015
#7
'N the hip bone connected to the thigh bone, now hear the word of the Lord. LOL!
Surya Gayatri
Jun 2015
#11
This great song makes more sense than their meandering, contorted writing.
Surya Gayatri
Jun 2015
#13
They too would be utterly, side-splittingly hilarous, IF they didn't wield so much nefarious power.
Surya Gayatri
Jun 2015
#17
Didnt the aztecs also ritualistically chop off heads and use them as soccer balls?
Warren DeMontague
Jun 2015
#19
I believe so. In fact, they've been credited with inventing football, IIRC.
Surya Gayatri
Jun 2015
#21
shenmue
(38,506 posts)1. Was it open mic night?
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)2. They got caught with their collective partisan pants down...
But, seriesly!!1!11!!
Is this kind of drivel worthy of the highest court in the land?
FOR SHAME...
luvspeas
(1,883 posts)3. REALLY?
This was not a ruling on human dignity. It's simply that it's unconstitutional to discriminate against two people who wish to exercise their right to marry in this country because of their gender. period. end of sentence. peace out.
Solly Mack
(90,780 posts)4. They are twisted thinkers.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)6. Some serious judicial contortion work on display here...
marym625
(17,997 posts)5. hard to justify the unjustifiable
So they all decided to spew insanity. What choice did they have?
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)7. They should be ashamed of themselves...is this SUPREME COURT-quality arguing?
marym625
(17,997 posts)8. If it is. ..
Then I'm a cardiovascular surgeon
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)9. Who knows? Maybe you have some SKILLZ you never imagined.
You'd probably do as well in the operating theater as they do in the Halls of Justice.
marym625
(17,997 posts)10. LOL!
No doubt. I know the head bones connected to the neck bone.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)11. 'N the hip bone connected to the thigh bone, now hear the word of the Lord. LOL!
marym625
(17,997 posts)12. dem bones
"Delta Rhythm Boys - Dry Bones"
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)13. This great song makes more sense than their meandering, contorted writing.
marym625
(17,997 posts)15. absolutely cracking me up!
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)17. They too would be utterly, side-splittingly hilarous, IF they didn't wield so much nefarious power.
marym625
(17,997 posts)22. Yes. It's truly scary that they do. eom
Hepburn
(21,054 posts)14. Scalia makes my skin crawl
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)16. The most odious of subhumans. Truly repugnant. His person and his ideas.
Hepburn
(21,054 posts)18. IMO, there truly is something wrong with that man.
He is one sick SOB...and mean, vulgar and evil on top of it. I detest him.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)20. Complete contempt here, too. What a parody of justice...
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)19. Didnt the aztecs also ritualistically chop off heads and use them as soccer balls?
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)21. I believe so. In fact, they've been credited with inventing football, IIRC.
GeorgeGist
(25,322 posts)23. What would Clarence know of dignity?
KG
(28,752 posts)24. Thomas' is frighteningly dellusional