Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCounty DA in Texas pens amazing letter on clerks' issuing SSM marriage licenses.
https://www.victoriaadvocate.com/news/2015/jul/07/das-letter-about-gay-marriage-widely-distributed/Snip
It (the letter) answered burning questions Easley and others across the state had about the implications of the ruling and how to proceed, questions they felt hadn't been answered by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton.
Snip
Tyler pointed out that refusing to perform job duties would open county clerks up to a lawsuit, and Paxton had not promised to foot their legal bills.
Rushing posted Tyler's letter on a county clerk listserv, and it has been widely distributed since. It deciphers the legalese and cuts out the politics, elected officials said.
Snip
Good article. The letter is two pages and lays it out for clerks and precinct commissioners and j.p.s. Tyler really took apart Tx Atty Gen Paxton's idiotic comments on the SCOTUS ruling. The letter is in pdf form on the page at the above link.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 874 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
County DA in Texas pens amazing letter on clerks' issuing SSM marriage licenses. (Original Post)
Ilsa
Jul 2015
OP
One of the Bush lawyers for the 2000 election argued in favor of marriage in California
arcane1
Jul 2015
#6
Important to point out that AG Paxton's grandstanding will not protect the clerks.
yellowcanine
Jul 2015
#3
arcane1
(38,613 posts)1. There were two great paragraphs in there but I can't copy them
And I'm too lazy to type it up
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)5. Tyler is a Republican, but he cares more about the law
versus Paxton's political career. I believe he's had to handle some ugly cases involving local officials in the past.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)6. One of the Bush lawyers for the 2000 election argued in favor of marriage in California
Ted Olson. It was a surprise, but it was nice to see some objectivity in unexpected places.
Gothmog
(145,321 posts)2. This is a great letter
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)3. Important to point out that AG Paxton's grandstanding will not protect the clerks.
He has noting to lose with his stance, the county clerks have everything to lose. He should be publicly smacked down for the weasel that he is.
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)4. The closing of Tyler's letter was a wonderfully scary metaphor:
He (Paxton) is not the lifeguard at this pool, and (3)The water is deep and dark, so all swimmers WILL swim at their own risk.
Paxton is throwing the clerks to the wolves with his bad legal advice based on politics.
I wish the letter wasn't a pdf.
Paxton is throwing the clerks to the wolves with his bad legal advice based on politics.
I wish the letter wasn't a pdf.
petronius
(26,602 posts)7. It's a bit clunky in terms of line breaks and highlighting, but think you can cut and paste
if you press the 'fullscreen' button then switch to 'text' view for the page you want to copy from. E.g.:
While the State of Texas and Victoria County make reasonable accommodations for the
religious beliefs of all persons, the public cannot be required to accommodate the religious
beliefs of a government office holder if those beliefs preclude the office holder from fulfilling
their oath to faithfully execute the legal duties of their office. Please recall, the duty in question
is the issuance of a government document in accordance with government law.
Individual religious freedom is a fundamental right set forth in both the U.S. and Texas
constitutions, and last week the Supreme Court ruled that same-sex couples now have a
fundamental right to civil marriage. However, neither the U.S. nor Texas Constitutions regard a
County Clerk holding office nor a Deputy Clerk continued employment as a fundamental right. If and when core beliefs conflict with the duties of office one has sworn to uphold, a dilemma
emerges and a choice must be made. In the military there exists an honored tradition, whereby
instead of refusing an order perceived immoral or imprudent, an officer makes his dissent known
and resigns his commission. I empathize with your dilemma and will respect your decision.
religious beliefs of all persons, the public cannot be required to accommodate the religious
beliefs of a government office holder if those beliefs preclude the office holder from fulfilling
their oath to faithfully execute the legal duties of their office. Please recall, the duty in question
is the issuance of a government document in accordance with government law.
Individual religious freedom is a fundamental right set forth in both the U.S. and Texas
constitutions, and last week the Supreme Court ruled that same-sex couples now have a
fundamental right to civil marriage. However, neither the U.S. nor Texas Constitutions regard a
County Clerk holding office nor a Deputy Clerk continued employment as a fundamental right. If and when core beliefs conflict with the duties of office one has sworn to uphold, a dilemma
emerges and a choice must be made. In the military there exists an honored tradition, whereby
instead of refusing an order perceived immoral or imprudent, an officer makes his dissent known
and resigns his commission. I empathize with your dilemma and will respect your decision.
Not that it really matters though; the letter deserves to be read in its entirety...
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)8. I thought it was marvelous that he told them that
Their jobs would not be protected as a "fundamental right". He suggested they do their jobs or resign.
Thanks for the copy and paste. I don't have my desktop PC available, so I'm not certain I can do the functions from my phone.